Thread: Ron Paul to oversee Federal Reserve

A step in the right direction! Thank god it's someone with some sense and knows wtf he's talking about, rather than another of Obama's incompetent ultra left cronies.

The only one who might be better would be Barney Fagg, since he has such a good track record overseeing Fannie & Freddie. Just sayin'

He should have been President.

You must really hate poor people and minorities.

He's not your typical politician. He's smart enough to know that if all classes are taken care of all of America will prosper.

yay

unfortunately that won't do a thing

Wow that was unexpected. Awesome though....very welcome.

Originally Posted by LAM

unfortunately that won't do a thing

Like your opinion matters here when you put that dipshit Harry Reid back in office.

Old but still relevant.

Originally Posted by GearsMcGilf

Like your opinion matters here when you put that dipshit Harry Reid back in office.

lol @ Sharon Angle she is the epidemy of hypocrisy...unemployment is equal to welfare! easy to say for someone that never really had to work a full day in her life

what is Ron Paul single handed going to restructure the US economic system?

the US can't go back to gold, we don't have enough...

Originally Posted by LAM

lol @ Sharon Angle she is the epidemy of hypocrisy...unemployment is equal to welfare! easy to say for someone that never really had to work a full day in her life

what is Ron Paul single handed going to restructure the US economic system?

the US can't go back to gold, we don't have enough...

She wasn't the best repub candidate. But, it sure would've been nice to get rid of some more of the old guard, bought and paid for politicians.

No, Ron can't do that, but maybe he can help stop some of the bleeding and offer some insight. Afterall, he predicted the economic collapse long before it happened and was dismissed as a nutjob.

Originally Posted by LAM

lol @ Sharon Angle she is the epidemy of hypocrisy...unemployment is equal to welfare! easy to say for someone that never really had to work a full day in her life

what is Ron Paul single handed going to restructure the US economic system?

the US can't go back to gold, we don't have enough...

You usually make well rounds, and portray yourself as some one who can make an argument...arguments that are usually sound too.

Why are you so partisan hackish?

Originally Posted by GearsMcGilf

She wasn't the best repub candidate. But, it sure would've been nice to get rid of some more of the old guard, bought and paid for politicians.

No, Ron can't do that, but maybe he can help stop some of the bleeding and offer some insight. Afterall, he predicted the economic collapse long before it happened and was dismissed as a nutjob.

He'll bring a degree of visibility to a very cloudy operation....more important than that, he'll bring more awareness to monetary theory/policy, which most people can't even begin to grasp due to a lack of basic knowledge

Originally Posted by lnvanry

You usually make well rounds, and portray yourself as some one who can make an argument...arguments that are usually sound too.

Why are you so partisan hackish?

IMO the Fed is way beyond fixing at least any time soon, and we can't do anything drastic to destabilize the dollar. I wish there was something that could be done in the near future, just don't see anything happening to get us out of the situation that we are in with the dollar and japan and china. the fed can't raise rates any time soon or the few small business that want to expand in the future won't be able to afford funding. either way it's going to cost us in terms of an increased budget deficit for to offset the tax incentives. how exactly do we even stabilize the dollar with no real gdp growth? besides the years of real gdp growth during the 90's due to growth of the Internet our economy during all other "era's" of prosperity from 1970-2000 were created by the opening up of credit markets. so once again back the the real problem with personal consumption in the US generating close to what 65-70% of gdp. but the biggest spenders the middle class are tapped out right now with no possible way for that problem to be fixed by either side. that being the case I see the problem with the fed being of lesser importance right now.

in regards to Sharon Angle I hold none of the same views as her on any subject. anyone that mentions taking away a womans right to choose and/or messes with my VA, well that's an automatic show stopper. I'm from the main line in the philly suburbs and the extreme views of Sharon Angle do not represent me or any of my peers. No one I know is like Sharon Angle nor anyone they know.

thoughts on this:

Yay! Republicans!!


Yea, Angle is thing of the past...not worth spending anymore energy talking about

Originally Posted by LAM

in regards to Sharon Angle I hold none of the same views as her on any subject. anyone that mentions taking away a womans right to choose and/or messes with my VA, well that's an automatic show stopper. I'm from the main line in the philly suburbs and the extreme views of Sharon Angle do not represent me or any of my peers. No one I know is like Sharon Angle nor anyone they know.

I love that phrase "a woman's right to choose." Are we speaking of multiple options (abortion, adoption, contraception, etc.) or would that be the inalienable right to abortion on demand? Anyhoo, that phrase always gives me a chuckle by the way it glosses over the actual procedure itself and reduces it to a an simple choice over what to do with one's body. I'm not 100% against it. It's just ironic the way so many people actually think that anyone should have a constitutional right to a particular medical procedure.

i love it when a plan comes together