Thread: Peanut butter proves Evolution is Fake

Are the people in that video serious or is it a spoof on Kirk Cameron's Banana argument?
I just can't fathom the ignorance that brought about such illogical of an argument, how did we ever evolve to have Einsteins in this world with such idiocy on the other end of the spectrum, I guess if there is one thing we must believe is that there is a balance to the universe....

Talk about your blind faith, I just had to go to the guy who posted that vids profile to see if he is joking but I see he is so jaded into believing this video is a rational argument...Holy Mind Fucked batman....

"Evolutionists propose that over the course of billions of years all life evolved from single cell organisms. They tell us that the whales, elephants, giraffes, hippopotamus, dinosaurs, mammoth elephants, rhinoceros and walrus were at one point little small creatures. They want us to believe their theory that small animals slowly mutated and change many, many times over billions of years. Their theory is that these mutated animals slowly increased in size until huge mammals and reptiles roamed the earth and all sizes of sea creatures developed in the oceans. Just thinking about that is an incredible, mind-boggling thought. There is one problem with which these evolutionists must cope—no evidence. If their theory is true then there ought to be literally millions of fossils that show thousands of transitional forms of all of these animals. (Uh not every thing becomes fossilized when it dies dip shit, if that were the case no new life would come into being since we are efficiently recycled by nature, we are lucky to stumble upon the few fossils we have found)There should be thousands upon thousands of bones that became fossilized during those billions of years which record the necks, legs and bodies of the giraffes slowly getting bigger and longer. There should also be plenty of fossil evidence showing the development of dinosaurs, horses, cows, alligators and all of the other animals known to man. However, there are none.(Obviously never read a book nor gone to a museum, slept through biology)

Absolutely no transitional fossils exists to prove their theory. Postulate all they might, they still have no hard evidence that any animal evolved from another. They rely solely upon similarities. They conjecture that since a man looks similar to a monkey, he must have evolved from one. That is the only proof that they can offer for evolution. That proves nothing. Because football stadiums in America have similarities to the ancient coliseum in Rome does not prove they evolved from one another(it's a perfect example of architectural evolution). Because clouds can have the shape of an elephant does not mean that elephants came from clouds. Anyone can see that. The similarities in animals also proves that the one and same being—God, created them all.

Plus, if bacteria spontaneously arose from nothing billions of years ago, why aren't they arising from nothing today?"