IronMagLabs Osta Rx


21 airlines fined for fixing passenger, cargo fees

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    LAM
    LAM is offline
    Is Doin It 4 Da Shorteez

    LAM's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    12,500
    Rep Points
    349917665


    21 airlines fined for fixing passenger, cargo fees

    21 airlines fined for fixing passenger, cargo fees
    By ALICIA A. CALDWELL, Associated Press Alicia A. Caldwell, Associated Press Sat Mar 5, 11:18 pm ET

    WASHINGTON – When the airline industry took a nose dive a decade ago, executives at global carriers scrambled to find a quick fix to avoid financial ruin.

    What they came up with, according to federal prosecutors, was a massive price-fixing scheme among airlines that artificially inflated passenger and cargo fuel surcharges between 2000 and 2006 to make up for lost profits.

    The airlines' crimes cost U.S. consumers and businesses — mostly international passengers and cargo shippers — hundreds of millions of dollars, prosecutors say.

    But the airlines caught by the Justice Department have paid a hefty price in the five years since the government's widespread investigation became public.

    To date, 19 executives have been charged with wrongdoing — four have gone to prison — and 21 airlines have coughed up more than $1.7 billion in fines in one of the largest criminal antitrust investigations in U.S. history.

    The court cases reveal a complex web of schemes between mostly international carriers willing to fix fees in lockstep with competitors for flights to and from the United States.

    Convicted airlines include British Airways, Korean Air, and Air France-KLM. No major U.S. carriers have been charged.

    The price-fixing unraveled largely because two airlines decided to come clean and turn in their co-conspirators.

    In late 2005, officials with German-based Lufthansa notified the Justice Department that the airline had been conspiring to set cargo surcharges. By Valentine's Day 2006, FBI agents and their counterparts in Europe made the investigation public by raiding airline offices. After those raids, British-based Virgin Atlantic came forward about its role in a similar scheme to set fuel surcharges for passengers.

    Investigators eventually found a detailed paper trail laying out agreements, stretching back to 2000, to set passenger and cargo fuel surcharges The probe expanded to airlines doing business between the U.S. and Europe, Asia, South America, and Australia.

    The Lufthansa and Virgin Atlantic mea culpas allowed them to take advantage of a Justice Department leniency program because they helped crack the conspiracies.

    Former Associate Attorney General Kevin J. O'Connor, who oversaw Justice's antitrust division in the late 2000s, said he doesn't know why they confessed, but the result "demonstrates the effectiveness of that amnesty program."

    Now in private practice, O'Connor said companies that confess for amnesty may be wisely trying to limit liabilities from illegal conduct.

    "Generally speaking, if they have an inkling they might get caught, they come in," O'Connor said. "The theory might be that eventually these things will be exposed and why risk continuing."

    Federal prosecutors and investigators declined to discuss details of the cases because they are still investigating.

    "Lufthansa Cargo fully cooperated with the investigation launched by DOJ," Martin Riecken, Lufthansa's director of corporate communications for the Americas said. Virgin Atlantic referred all questions to the Justice Department.

    Airlines and executives who didn't come forward were charged with violating the Sherman Antitrust Act.

    Two former airline executives were sentenced to six months in prison; two others were ordered to prison for eight months. Charges are pending against 15 executives, nine of whom are considered fugitives.

    Bruce McCaffrey, one-time vice president of freight for the Americas at the Australian carrier Qantas, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to restrain trade. He was sentenced to six months in prison in 2008. He admitted working with other airlines to fix cargo fuel surcharges between 2000 and 2006.

    Keith H. Packer, a former senior manager of sales and marketing for British Airways, pleaded to conspiracy to restrain trade and was sentenced to eight months in prison in 2008. He admitted joining the cargo conspiracy in 2002 and participating until February 2006.

    British Airways and Korean Air pleaded guilty to violating the Sherman act; each was fined $300 million in August 2007.

    British Airways admitted fixing cargo surcharges from 2002 to 2006 and passenger fuel surcharges from 2004 to 2006. Korean Air admitted fixing cargo and passenger surcharges from 2000 to 2006.

    Announcing four guilty pleas in June 2008, O'Connor said the case "conservatively, has affected billions of dollars of shipments. Estimates suggest that the harm to American consumers and businesses from this conspiracy is in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

    "As an example of the impact of the conspiracy, fuel surcharges imposed by some of the conspirators rose by as much as 1,000 percent during the conspiracy, far outpacing any percentage increases in fuel costs that existed during the same time period," O'Connor said.

    In one of several lawsuits by passengers and cargo shippers now being heard in a California federal court, San Francisco-based lawyer Christopher Lebsock and others allege airline officials routinely gathered at industry meetings to discuss fuel costs and how to make up losses.

    Lebsock said they agreed to add or increase the fuel surcharges that are tacked onto passenger fares and cargo fees.

    "We have seen in public documents that they were concerned and wanted to raise revenue to offset the increasing price in fuel," Lebsock said.

    According to published notes of an October 2005 meeting of airline representatives in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, a host of executives openly spoke about surcharges already in place. One official, identified in meeting minutes only by the initials" GF," suggested the group create "a subcommittee to study this subject and come up with a joint proposal."

    According to published notes of another meeting of airline representatives in Saudi Arabia in September 2004, "the participants agreed to make uniform policy for such (insurance and fuel) surcharges to be applied."

    Not all airline officials at these meetings agreed to join the conspiracies.

    During a 2004 industry meeting in Thailand, executives from U.S. based-United Airlines and Northwest Airlines left the meeting when others started discussing setting fares and fuel surcharges, according to a court filing by lawyers in one class action suit.

    Warren Gerig, an international manager for United when he walked out of that meeting, declined to discuss the case. The Northwest executive was identified only as Sarathool M. and could not be reached.

    While meeting notes make it appear the discussions were open to anyone who accidently walked into the wrong ballroom, Lebsock and Justice officials believe executives were more careful to hide their activities.

    "My sense is they weren't really open to the public," Lebsock said. "They weren't that stupid."

    Lebsock said documents obtained in pretrial discovery make clear that many surcharge discussions carried over from large group meetings around the world to more private office settings and e-mail discussions

    According to one passenger lawsuit, several Asian airlines — including Cathay Pacific Airways, Japan Airlines, and All Nippon Airways — confined many discussions to phone calls and e-mails. Lebsock said evidence shows some airline executives tried to hide or destroy incriminating documents and e-mails.

    Lebsock believes the conspiracies were so well hidden that it's possible they would have continued undetected had Lufthansa not come forward.

    "In the absence of someone coming forward, and ratting it out, it is very, very difficult to establish that there was a (conspiracy)," Lebsock said.

    ___

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110306/...FpcmxpbmVzZmk-

    Online:

    Justice Department's antitrust division: USDOJ: Antitrust Division Home Page

    * And some people are gullible enough to think that this doesn't happen on Wall Street or in certain financial markets...
    I train differently than most, my beef is with gravity the weights on the bar are just the medium...Thanks to Wall Street your slice of the American Pie has been reduced to a crumb.

  2. #2
    Windy City
    ELITE MEMBER

    Big Smoothy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    4,969
    Rep Points
    102487888


    Sounds like collusion.

    Fined? What about the people who bought the tickets? Including me.
    Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first.

    Mark Twain

  3. #3
    LAM
    LAM is offline
    Is Doin It 4 Da Shorteez

    LAM's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    12,500
    Rep Points
    349917665


    I think the SOP for something like this will eventually lead to a class action
    I train differently than most, my beef is with gravity the weights on the bar are just the medium...Thanks to Wall Street your slice of the American Pie has been reduced to a crumb.

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Phetamine's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    473
    Rep Points
    88784299


    So am I reading that airlines in the US are innocent of this? Or they just knew enough about the law not to be there when talked about openly in such a way.

  5. #5
    I'm CEO, Bitch!
    ADMINISTRATOR

    Prince's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    A Virtual Reality
    Posts
    53,754
    Rep Points
    1600942420


    here is what I want to know, the airlines were bailed out by the government after 9-11, then they all implemented these extra baggage fees, from one report I heard recently they have made billions with all of these baggage fees, so when do they stop this shit and start paying us all back?

  6. #6
    Bohemian Extraordinaire
    ELITE MEMBER

    maniclion's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Mēns Incognita
    Posts
    25,581
    Rep Points
    396362507


    United and Southwest it seems knew about it and said nothing even though they weren't involved that's still wrong....
    Coarse edged youth, the irish pendants string from their smiles
    not yet plucked as to slacken the seams
    and drag down the features of age,
    no folds or creases from unkempt wear
    eyes of tranquilty, crystalline-beads
    no sign of despair in their hair, nor their hearts
    but oh they have yet to be experienced and that makes aging so very worth it...ML circa2012

  7. #7
    LAM
    LAM is offline
    Is Doin It 4 Da Shorteez

    LAM's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    12,500
    Rep Points
    349917665


    Quote Originally Posted by Prince View Post
    here is what I want to know, the airlines were bailed out by the government after 9-11, then they all implemented these extra baggage fees, from one report I heard recently they have made billions with all of these baggage fees, so when do they stop this shit and start paying us all back?
    GWB didn't put any strings on the monies loaned to the airlines...apparently anyone can get an MBA these days and you don't have to know anything about economics or business development.

    remember to the GOP ALL business are good even if they destroy our economy and/or ecosystems...
    I train differently than most, my beef is with gravity the weights on the bar are just the medium...Thanks to Wall Street your slice of the American Pie has been reduced to a crumb.

  8. #8
    .45 ACP rules!

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,395
    Rep Points
    381027210


    Quote Originally Posted by Prince View Post
    here is what I want to know, the airlines were bailed out by the government after 9-11, then they all implemented these extra baggage fees, from one report I heard recently they have made billions with all of these baggage fees, so when do they stop this shit and start paying us all back?
    Never. The best way to stop them is to quit flying.

Similar Threads

  1. The passing of the passenger pigeon
    By min0 lee in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-06-2010, 03:41 PM
  2. Delta Passenger Scrutinized for Tattoo
    By Prince in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 11-26-2010, 07:47 AM
  3. Airlines
    By KentDog in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-21-2008, 02:24 PM
  4. Airlines using Outsourcing?!?!??!
    By Crono1000 in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-10-2005, 09:14 AM
  5. United Airlines - bankrupt?
    By Prince in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-15-2002, 02:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.