

Many people will swear by their opinions on anabolic related subjects on various forums making people confused on which theories are correct or practical rather.
I was speaking with gym rat earlier in a friendly dispute about increasing test dosages mid cycle by another 200mgs on top of the 600 that this one guy was asking about doing in a 14 week cycle.
People on here will agree that results will cease after 9 weeks on cycle, while other people will agree on other forums like steroidology that cycles without the addition or eq or deca can last to 12 weeks still yielding results.
The reason I am writing this article is because this is an important subject that deserves an accurate answer.
Another example, people on here will agree that you should taper off your cycle while other forums swear that it should be stopped cold turkey.
So who is right and who is wrong. What makes one forum more credible than the next forum?
There are many, many theories out there but whose are more correct?
See what I am saying? Believe me, I am not trying to shit where I eat but lately this is all I do when I am not working or working out so you can see how this can be a pain to the researcher.
Gym rat, no offense intended but I wanted to use you as an example because it is most recent dispute.
Any thoughts? Non biased one hopefully!
Km

Feudal post in my opinion.
DISCLAIMER: