Thread: Michele Bachmann for President?

Muttonhead didn't have to venture all the way back to 1911 to compare the devaluation of the dollar. All the numbskull had to do was go back say, 2000-2008, while her male counterpart was in the lands highest office.

It's just okay for the party she represents to be maleficent and lead this once great nation into the depths of destruction.

And people want to place the reigns back into the hands of the party that led us down into this calamity.

Oh lord, just take me now! Cause, I can't bear to live 4-8 yrs. of those frustrating, evil years of the Rep. party fucking over the whole country and lying to the world.

Then steamrolling their agenda down everybodies throats.

Originally Posted by troubador

That should be you're not your; there should be they're. I know it's a forum but your punctuation is also atrocious. I'm not a grammar elitist but you're not exactly putting up tenth grade level work either.

the misuse of pronouns is one of the most common typing mistakes.

unfortunately I'm still in a bad habit of typing too fast and not checking my own work for errors. I used to write professionally for many years for cmp media back in the 90's and that made things worst by having access to proofreaders who checked all my work before being published.

and I stick by my statement. US schools are designed to turn out low quality students, it's how the neo-liberal agenda flourishes in the US. in terms of economic literacy and critical thinking the US ranks at the bottom in the OECD.

Originally Posted by IronAddict

Muttonhead didn't have to venture all the way back to 1911 to compare the devaluation of the dollar. All the numbskull had to do was go back say, 2000-2008, while her male counterpart was in the lands highest office.

It's just okay for the party she represents to be maleficent and lead this once great nation into the depths of destruction.

And people want to place the reigns back into the hands of the party that led us down into this calamity.

Oh lord, just take me now! Cause, I can't bear to live 4-8 yrs. of those frustrating, evil years of the Rep. party fucking over the whole country and lying to the world.

Then steamrolling their agenda down everybodies throats.

and this is different from the democrats how?

Best we can hope for is a white house of one party and a congress of another so they fight and bicker and get nothing accomplished. thereby leaving us alone as much as humanly possible.

I would add that my preference would be to somehow get as many Chief Justice Roberts on the Supreme Court as we could possibly fit on there.

Originally Posted by bio-chem

Best we can hope for is a white house of one party and a congress of another so they fight and bicker and get nothing accomplished. thereby leaving us alone as much as humanly possible.

the laissez faire dream ended when government invented the corporation.

if you truly understood neo-liberal economics and strategies you would focus your energy's on realistic things as that is not one. I'm guessing that you are not aware of the history and function of the Trilateral Commission.

Originally Posted by LAM

the laissez faire dream ended when government invented the corporation.

if you truly understood neo-liberal economics and strategies you would focus your energy's on realistic things as that is not one. I'm guessing that you are not aware of the history and function of the Trilateral Commission.

You might be wasting your time here man. See, it's a comfort thing. Comfort is what this country is known for and to open your mind to the fact that your government might actually not give a damn about you, is real uncomfortable.

You have to first let go of everything you believe in and then look at things from a neutral point of view. If you break it down it's not unlikely at all that there are "villains" playing evil games out there. We all manipulate relationships and our surroundings every day but only within our circle of influence. Why? well that's all we can affect. The difference is that some people in this world have a circle of influence that is limited only by the laws of physics.

Think about it like this, Your were born rich to the extent that nobody in your family, now or ever, will have to worry about anything. Now if you do not have to rely on doing good in school to get a good job, you don't have to do work to live , you don't have to grocery shop, or pay a bill, or stop by the gas station... you get my point? You now have aaaaalot of free time and tremendous power. Now add on top of that that you are just a little bit evil and really really bored.

so my question is, WHY WOULDN'T YOU?

the scenario above obviously does not refer to the common politician but understand, politicians are only pawns and are really nowhere close to the top.

Different face with a same policies. Nothing will change no matter who wins. This country will keep going down the hill.

Originally Posted by LAM

the laissez faire dream ended when government invented the corporation.

if you truly understood neo-liberal economics and strategies you would focus your energy's on realistic things as that is not one. I'm guessing that you are not aware of the history and function of the Trilateral Commission.

do you really believe the bullshit you write? I mean i've heard of people like you, but i've never actually met one.

Originally Posted by Chubby

Different face with a same policies. Nothing will change no matter who wins. This country will keep going down the hill.

Exactly.

Originally Posted by bio-chem

do you really believe the bullshit you write? I mean i've heard of people like you, but i've never actually met one.

yep...see first I didn't have an opinion about politics, shit I never even voted until I got out of the Navy in '94 at 26. then I did a shit load of research for about 14-15 years and spent thousands of hours reading documents from the UN, ILO, OECD, the FRB and from economists all over the world. then after that I formed an educated opinion, what is yours based on?

My guess is you haven't read the transcripts from the UN from '74 that state countries voting on a resolution to allow the forming of a new world economic order, they are on the website.

I'm sure you haven't read the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises where it states that international company's need only abide by the laws, regulations and employment standards and wages equivalent to that of the host countries that they reside in, that came out in '76.

And I'm also guessing that you haven't read the Trilateral Declaration of Principles that was first published in '77 were they mention the UN resolution on page 2 allowing the formation of a new world economic order, because it's right there on the ILO website.

Almost positive you haven't read the Depository Institutions Deregulation And Monetary Control Act of 1980 which gave the FRB new powers. And I'm guessing that you didn't correlate that with the election of a very charismatic governor from california that was elected in '81 and sold the US on supply-side economics and union busting while the PM in the UK was doing the very same thing to the citizens there. See the OECD "Guidelines for more information.

should I continue or do you need a refresher of US and Global economics over the past 30 years?

J.D Rockefeller was a fan of Karl Marx in terms of his views of democracy and capitalism, its limits and limitations as what big business can do as long as it remains faithful to the people and he learned from this, true democracy limits capitalism. But what if a strategy was devised that changed government and made it appear to be democratic to the people but in function only served the benefit of big business. The Trilateral Commission devised a economic plan for this called supply-side economics which through various methods would make democracy appear to be so on the outside but in function only benefit big company's both private and multinational. And what a shocker the 3 most powerful countries were it's first members, the US, UK and Japan.

By the way which country first adopted supply-side economics? and what exactly has it been doing with it's military for the past 30 years? You can't sell goods and services to communists, they don't trade much. Democracy is a pre-cusor to "capitalism" and if you have any problems getting your citizens to agree with this, you can send some people to the school of the americans were they can be trained in "techniques" to re-educate the people like they did in Latin America.

do the research comunisism never works taxing to 80% DOES NOT WORK
free market works yah there are corrupt people out there but the free market has been working for a few centuries just get the government out of our lives and we as americans will fix it ourselves

Originally Posted by LAM

yep...see first I didn't have an opinion about politics, shit I never even voted until I got out of the Navy in '94 at 26. then I did a shit load of research for about 14-15 years and spent thousands of hours reading documents from the UN, ILO, OECD, the FRB and from economists all over the world. then after that I formed an educated opinion, what is yours based on?

My guess is you haven't read the transcripts from the UN from '74 that state countries voting on a resolution to allow the forming of a new world economic order, they are on the website.

I'm sure you haven't read the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises where it states that international company's need only abide by the laws, regulations and employment standards and wages equivalent to that of the host countries that they reside in, that came out in '76.

And I'm also guessing that you haven't read the Trilateral Declaration of Principles that was first published in '77 were they mention the UN resolution on page 2 allowing the formation of a new world economic order, because it's right there on the ILO website.

Almost positive you haven't read the Depository Institutions Deregulation And Monetary Control Act of 1980 which gave the FRB new powers. And I'm guessing that you didn't correlate that with the election of a very charismatic governor from california that was elected in '81 and sold the US on supply-side economics and union busting while the PM in the UK was doing the very same thing to the citizens there. See the OECD "Guidelines for more information.

should I continue or do you need a refresher of US and Global economics over the past 30 years?

J.D Rockefeller was a fan of Karl Marx in terms of his views of democracy and capitalism, its limits and limitations as what big business can do as long as it remains faithful to the people and he learned from this, true democracy limits capitalism. But what if a strategy was devised that changed government and made it appear to be democratic to the people but in function only served the benefit of big business. The Trilateral Commission devised a economic plan for this called supply-side economics which through various methods would make democracy appear to be so on the outside but in function only benefit big company's both private and multinational. And what a shocker the 3 most powerful countries were it's first members, the US, UK and Japan.

By the way which country first adopted supply-side economics? and what exactly has it been doing with it's military for the past 30 years? You can't sell goods and services to communists, they don't trade much. Democracy is a pre-cusor to "capitalism" and if you have any problems getting your citizens to agree with this, you can send some people to the school of the americans were they can be trained in "techniques" to re-educate the people like they did in Latin America.

Please continue. I believe everyone here is enthralled with your economic history lesson. you saying you arent political is awesome.

^ LAM is worth reading when he posts. He's done his homework.

Those who disagree, can disagree based on facts, stats, and numbers. They just use the "jack off" icon.

Originally Posted by bio-chem

Please continue. I believe everyone here is enthralled with your economic history lesson. you saying you arent political is awesome.

like I stated I formed an opinion AFTER doing many years of research. my opinions were formed from analyzing economic data and that from other organizational websites, not from the rhetoric of my parents or the talking heads on tv. I am against neo-liberalism and whatever party or politicians support it the most.

tv is not reality and that is where 85% of the US population gets 100% of their information from regarding economics and the state of the world. this is why it's so easy for politicians to sell the sheep solutions to problems that were not the cause.

Originally Posted by bio-chem

Please continue. I believe everyone here is enthralled with your economic history lesson. you saying you arent political is awesome.

Once you understand the neo-liberal model you'll realize blah blah blah. Years of research, etc. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/41/50/47984536.pdf