IronMagLabs Osta Rx


'Amazing' therapy wipes out leukemia in study

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Elite Member
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Curt James's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    14,170
    Rep Points
    2147483647


    Exclamation 'Amazing' therapy wipes out leukemia in study

    'Amazing' therapy wipes out leukemia in study

    By Stephanie Nano
    August 10, 2011

    NEW YORK (AP) - Scientists are reporting the first clear success with a new approach for treating leukemia - turning the patients' own blood cells into assassins that hunt and destroy their cancer cells.

    They've only done it in three patients so far, but the results were striking: Two appear cancer-free up to a year after treatment, and the third patient is improved but still has some cancer.

    Scientists are already preparing to try the same gene therapy technique for other kinds of cancer.

    "It worked great. We were surprised it worked as well as it did," said Dr. Carl June, a gene therapy expert at the University of Pennsylvania. "We're just a year out now. We need to find out how long these remissions last."

    He led the study, published Wednesday by two journals, New England Journal of Medicine and Science Translational Medicine.

    It involved three men with very advanced cases of chronic* lymphocytic leukemia, or CLL. The only hope for a cure now is bone marrow or stem cell transplants, which don't always work and carry a high risk of death.

    Scientists have been working for years to find ways to boost the immune system's ability to fight cancer. Earlier attempts at genetically modifying bloodstream soldiers called T-cells have had limited success; the modified cells didn't reproduce well and quickly disappeared.

    June and his colleagues made changes to the technique, using a novel carrier to deliver the new genes into the T-cells and a signaling mechanism telling the cells to kill and multiply.

    That resulted in armies of "serial killer" cells that targeted cancer cells, destroyed them, and went on to kill new cancer as it emerged. It was known that T-cells attack viruses that way, but this is the first time it's been done against cancer, June said.

    For the experiment, blood was taken from each patient and T-cells removed. After they were altered in a lab, millions of the cells were returned to the patient in three infusions.

    The researchers described the experience of one 64-year-old patient in detail. There was no change for two weeks, but then he became ill with chills, nausea and fever. He and the other two patients were hit with a condition that occurs when a large number of cancer cells die at the same time - a sign that the gene therapy is working.

    "It was like the worse flu of their life," June said. "But after that, it's over. They're well."

    The main complication seems to be that this technique also destroys some other infection-fighting blood cells; so far the patients have been getting monthly treatments for that.

    Penn researchers want to test the gene therapy technique in leukemia-related cancers, as well as pancreatic and ovarian cancer, he said. Other institutions are looking at prostate and brain cancer.

    Dr. Walter J. Urba of the Providence Cancer Center in Portland, Ore., called the findings "pretty remarkable" but added a note of caution because of the size of the study.

    "It's still just three patients. Three's better than one, but it's not 100," said Urba, one of the authors of an editorial on the research that appears in the New England Journal.

    What happens long-term is key, he said: "What's it like a year from now, two years from now, for these patients."

    But Dr. Kanti Rai, a blood cancer expert at New York's Long Island Jewish Medical Center, could hardly contain his enthusiasm, saying he usually is more reserved in his comments on such reports.

    "It's an amazing, amazing kind of achievement," said Rai, who had no role in the research.

    One of the patients, who did not want to be identified, wrote about his illness, and released a statement through the university. The man, himself a scientist, called himself "very lucky," although he wrote that he didn't feel that way when he was first diagnosed 15 years ago at age 50.

    He was successfully treated over the years with chemotherapy until standard drugs no longer worked.

    Now, almost a year since he entered the study, "I'm healthy and still in remission. I know this may not be a permanent condition, but I decided to declare victory and assume that I had won."

    Online:

    New England Journal: MMS: Error

    Science journal: Science Translational Medicine

    From The Associated Press

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER
    hypno's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,217
    Rep Points
    74731853


    This is amazing. I know what this is like as my mother died from L. Long way to go still but this looks to be a giant step. Lord willing it will progress better than hoped for.

  3. #3
    Registered User


    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Uk
    Posts
    640
    Rep Points
    65375639



  4. #4
    Elite Member
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Curt James's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    14,170
    Rep Points
    2147483647


    Quote Originally Posted by hypno View Post
    This is amazing. I know what this is like as my mother died from L. Long way to go still but this looks to be a giant step. Lord willing it will progress better than hoped for.
    My grandfather died from leukemia back in the '60s.

  5. #5
    Elite Member
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Curt James's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    14,170
    Rep Points
    2147483647


    Quote Originally Posted by AdmiralRichard View Post
    Let me get you a refill there, Admiral.

  6. #6
    Registered User


    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Uk
    Posts
    640
    Rep Points
    65375639


    Quote Originally Posted by Curt James View Post
    My grandfather died from leukemia back in the '60s.
    how do you know they didn't invent it until the mid 70's

  7. #7
    Registered User


    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Uk
    Posts
    640
    Rep Points
    65375639


    Quote Originally Posted by Curt James View Post
    Let me get you a refill there, Admiral.
    Its the trendy thing to do

  8. #8
    Elite Member
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Curt James's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    14,170
    Rep Points
    2147483647


    Quote Originally Posted by AdmiralRichard View Post
    how do you know they didn't invent it until the mid 70's
    Interesting.

    History of Leukemia

    Discovery of Leukemia
    Generally, the ancient Greeks are credited with being the first to recognize cancer some time in the 4th or 5th century B.C.E. (Greaves, 2000). In 1932, Louis Leakey discovered a mandible in Kenya of Australopithecus or Homo erectus that George Stathopolous believes was a malignant tumor and may have been Burkitt's lymphoma, a common cancer of the jaw in contemporary east Africa. The bones of a dinosaur that may have had cancer have been found from 150 million years ago (Greaves, 2000).

    Leukemia was not officially diagnosed until 1845, when John Hughes Benett diagnosed it in Edinburgh (Greaves, 2000). Other European physicians in the 19th century observed that their patients had abnormally high levels of white blood cells, and they called the disease “weisses blut,” meaning “white blood.”

    The term “leukemia” that is used now comes from the Greek words “leukos” and “heima,” also meaning “white blood” (Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, 2005). In 1913, four types of leukemia were classified: chronic lymphocytic leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia, and erythroleukemia. In 1970, it was first confirmed that some patients could be cured of leukemia, and by the 1980s and 1990s the cure rates for leukemia were around 70% (Pui, 2003).

    Although cancer was less common before the twentieth century, humans have been getting cancer for a long time. Some explanations for the increase during the twentieth century are that more people are surviving who would have died of infectious disease, and that in the past many times cancer may not have been properly diagnosed (Greaves, 2000).

    William Harvey's recognition of the circulatory system of the blood and Gaspae Aselli's explanation of the lymphatic system were important for the diagnosis and understanding of cancer (Greaves, 2000). In the 19th and 20th centuries, physicians first began recognizing that certain factors could increase the risk of developing cancer. In the 1920s, Hermann Muller recognized that ionizing radiation could cause mutations in DNA that contributed to cancer (Greaves, 2000).

    The increase of childhood leukemia in modern times may be lifestyle-related. In developed countries, families are usually smaller and hygiene has improved. Infants are no longer exposed to infections at an early age (Greaves, 2000). Our immune systems have evolved to respond to infections shortly after birth, usually through the mother's antibodies during breast-feeding. The immune systems of children exposed at later ages, without having confronted microbes at an earlier age, may not respond as well. These children may have increased risk of developing leukemia.

    The incidence of leukemia is higher among more industrialized nations, and in those nations among people of higher socioeconomic status, because these people are living in an environment that is least like the environment humans evolved to fit. People in these privileged positions are exposed to more pesticides and chemicals, and fewer infectious diseases, than other people.

    History of Leukemia Treatment

    Arsenic
    Historically, one of the most common treatments for leukemia was arsenic. This cure is mentioned in the ancient Ramayana of India, and was used by Hippocrates (460-370 BC), who gave cancer its name, from the Greek term "carcinos" or "karkinos" for crab (Waxman and Anderson, 2001).

    In the 18th century, Thomas Fowler created what became known as "Fowler's Solution," a combination of arsenic trioxide and potassium bicarbonate, which "became a standard remedy to treat anemia, Hodgkin's disease, and leukemia"(Waxman and Anderson, 2001). Arsenic became the primary therapy for leukemia, used up to the early 20th century, when it fell out of favor with the advent of radiation therapy (Waxman and Anderson, 2001).

    In 1865, a German physician named Lissauer used Fowler's solution to treat chronic myelocytic leukemia (Burns, 2004). In the 1970s in China, arsenic was revived as a treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia. Today, some researchers continue to investigate arsenic as an effective treatment for leukemia.

    Radiation Therapy
    In the early 20th century, leukemia was considered an incurable, chronic disease. Around 1897, after the discovery of radiation, studies showed that x-rays could reduce the size of tumors: "it was discovered that daily doses of radiation over several weeks would greatly improve therapeutic response" (American Cancer Society).

    After medical investigation, "x-ray radiation for patient therapy moved into the clinical routine in the early 1920s" (Imaginis). Shortly after becoming widely used, radiation was shown to be a cause as well as a cure for leukemia. According to the American Cancer Society, "many early radiologists used the skin of their arms to test the strength of radiation from their radiotherapy machines, looking for a dose that would produce a pink reaction (erythema) that looked like sunburn.”

    This was considered an accurate measure of the dose, called the "erythema dose." Unfortunately, but unsurprisingly, many of these early radiologists came down with leukemia (American Cancer Society).

    Chemotherapy
    Until after World War II, there were no adequate treatments for leukemia. One of the most important treatments for cancer, chemotherapy, actually developed from an agent of chemical warfare used by the Germans during WWI, mustard gas, which attacks rapidly-dividing white blood cells.

    Scientists discovered the tumor-fighting effects of mustard gas when a group of soldiers during WWII accidentally came in contact with mustard gas and "were later found to have very low white blood cell counts" (American Cancer Society). This led to the invention of chemotherapy, a more targeted approach to nitrogen mustard exposure.

    In the 1940s there were new treatments, such as aminopterin, first used by Sidney Farber of Boston to treat acute childhood leukemia. Aminopterin is a compound related to folic acid that can be found in ALL patients in remission. Aminopterin prevents the DNA replication in tumor cells. After the discovery of aminopterin, "other researchers discovered drugs that blocked different functions involved in cell growth and replication. The era of chemotherapy had begun" (American Cancer Society).

    George Hitchings (1905-1998) and Gertrude Elion (1918-1999) used rational drug design to create 6-mercaptopurin, the first truly effective leukemia drug.

    By 1950, the pair had combined diaminopurine and thioguanine, which disrupted DNA synthesis by replacing adenine and guanine. "Elion later substituted an oxygen atom with a sulfur atom on a purine molecule, thereby creating 6-mercaptopurine (also known as 6-MP)" (Bowden). Despite these new treatments, leukemia was not conquered.

    Many patients entered remission, but they later relapsed and died. Elion researched the drug intensively, with the result that today therapy uses 6-MP in combination with other drugs, and continues during remission.

    DNA
    The greatest advances of the 20th century took place with the advent of the discovery of DNA by James Watson and Francis Crick. This led to a greater understanding of the detailed mechanisms of cancer, answering some questions and leading to a number of others.

    In addition to the environmental risk factors, “as our understanding of DNA and genes increased, [scientists] learned that it was the damage to DNA by chemicals and radiation or introduction of new DNA sequences by viruses that often led to the development of cancer" (American Cancer Society).

    In the future, genetic analysis may prove to uncover new treatments for diseases like leukemia.


    From History of Leukemia

  9. #9
    Elite Member
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Curt James's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    14,170
    Rep Points
    2147483647


    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by AdmiralRichard View Post

    Its the trendy thing to do

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Muscle_Girl's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Gender
    Female
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,335
    Rep Points
    27105442

    This is great news, but I can't help but have flashes of I Am Legend. I have always believed when you fuck with nature, it fucks with you. I would expect longer-term side effects to come from this; but who knows, this could be the one time that it doesn't bite us in the ass.
    Just a girl.... Looking for muscles!!

  11. #11
    Chemically Engineered


    Join Date
    May 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Planet X
    Posts
    2,672
    Rep Points
    202711862


    from what I read is is strand of HIV that is transplanted into the blood, that attacks the cancer. Scary, but that is still very amazing.
    " In my opinion your success is not determined by the scale or the mirror, but by what adversity did you have to overcome to achieve what you have thus far. "
    - OSL

  12. #12
    Elite Member
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Curt James's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    14,170
    Rep Points
    2147483647


    Quote Originally Posted by Muscle_Girl View Post
    This is great news, but I can't help but have flashes of I Am Legend. I have always believed when you fuck with nature, it fucks with you. I would expect longer-term side effects to come from this; but who knows, this could be the one time that it doesn't bite us in the ass.
    Saw this first things this morning and had similar thoughts.

    How do the genetically modified T-cells know which cells to target? They only attack viruses and cancer?

    I hope the tested subjects stay in remission forever.

  13. #13
    Elite Member
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Curt James's Avatar


    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    14,170
    Rep Points
    2147483647


    Quote Originally Posted by OldSchoolLifter View Post
    from what I read is is strand of HIV that is transplanted into the blood, that attacks the cancer. Scary, but that is still very amazing.
    Where'd you see that? I'll have to Google some more. This is definitely interesting news.

    What would something like that cost, I'm wondering, too.

Similar Threads

  1. Baby wipes for swabbing injection site!! wtf
    By PurePersian in forum Anything Goes
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 02-16-2012, 01:35 PM
  2. Baby wipes for swabbing injection site!! wtf
    By PurePersian in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-13-2012, 07:14 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-08-2011, 01:00 PM
  4. Tan wipes
    By dodgethis in forum General Health & Awareness
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-30-2005, 05:57 PM
  5. Replies: 58
    Last Post: 12-31-2004, 07:18 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73