Thread: Seeing through walls

Originally Posted by Gissurjon

Citing case law is meaningless? What do you think lawyers do? You have been watching way to much Law and Order dude. The first thing a lawyer does when presented with a legal criminal issue is research case law..... then the lawyer will make an argument based the case law that was research. The fact that you made that statement lets me know you don't have the slightest clue how the actual criminal legal process is, you get your facts from the same source as most Americans, Hollywood.

Arguing with you about a process you have no idea about is about as productive as trying to teach my dead cat tricks, so bye bye.

Do you they do everything about by the book...1 most people can't afford a real lawyer or one that doesn't have 50 cases at once but..how much time do u think they would spend on your case if bustedmost people hang themselfs pretty quick after they are busted.....

Originally Posted by SFW

where, In the united states? I thought you were from norway you said. Well, we have the patriot act. i know that can supersede anyones so called "civil rights"

I don't think the internet lawyer was getting my point.that if they want to get you they will
he show try to teach his dead cat tricks he might be better at it than being a lawyer

Originally Posted by SFW

where, In the united states? I thought you were from norway you said. Well, we have the patriot act. i know that can supersede anyones so called "civil rights"

SFw i think we found our local LEO

Originally Posted by Gissurjon

[B]Held: Where, as here, the Government uses a device that is not in general public use, to explore details of a private home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion, the surveillance is a Fourth Amendment...

FLIR is in general public use, you can rent them at Home Depot to find wasted heat or gaps in your insulation...

Originally Posted by Gissurjon

What does the amount of people that go to jail for weed have to do with the constitutionality of FLIR? Are they all being caught with FLIR? I mean, what's your point by saying that. Show me cases where one has been locked up after the use of FLIR on his home, that would actually serve your point. Not just saying "hey allot of people go to jail for weed"

Internet lawyer? That's what I go to school for...

If you knew about the trash, why even bring it up when discussing illegal discovery of evidence, since going through the trash is defined completely different under the law?

If you didn't know, the U.S. legal system is based on case law.

Because a lot of people are getting caught by the initial use of FLIR flyovers....

http://touch.dailymotion.com/#/video...s-inc-flir_fun

Have you never seen COPs before, the helis switch to ir all the time while tracking criminals at night...

Originally Posted by maniclion

Because a lot of people are getting caught by the initial use of FLIR flyovers....

Dailymotion

Have you never seen COPs before, the helis switch to ir all the time while tracking criminals at night...

He's gun ho in college or he's a cop..