IronMagLabs Osta Rx


Supreme Court sides with church on decision to fire employee on religious grounds

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Post Supreme Court sides with church on decision to fire employee on religious grounds

    The Supreme Court has sided unanimously with a church sued for firing an employee on religious grounds, issuing an opinion on Wednesday that religious employers can keep the government out of hiring and firing decisions.
    In the case of Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC, Cheryl Perich, a "called" teacher, argued that the Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School of Redford, Mich., had discriminated against her under the Americans With Disabilities Act by refusing to reinstate her to her job after she took leave for narcolepsy.

    But the high court found that Perich's was properly classified as a "minister," meaning she falls within the "ministerial exemption" from many employment laws.
    "Because Perich was a minister within the meaning of the exception, the First Amendment requires dismissal of this employment discrimination suit against her religious employer," reads the ruling written by Chief Justice John Roberts. "The EEOC and Perich originally sought an order reinstating Perich to her former position as a called teacher. By requiring the Church to accept a minister it did not want, such an order would have plainly violated the Church's freedom under the Religion Clauses to select its own ministers. ...
    "The exception ... ensures that the authority to select and control who will minister to the faithful is the church's alone," the ruling reads.
    Roberts added that this particular case is based on the ministerial exception's use in dismissing the discrimination claim but does not bar other types of suits alleging breach of contract or "tortious conduct" by religious employers. The applicability of the exception to other circumstances would be dealt with separately "if and when they arise," he wrote.
    The high court's decision overturned an earlier decision by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
    Click here to read the ruling.


    Read more: Supreme Court Sides With Church On Decision To Fire Employee On Religious Grounds | Fox News

  2. #2
    RDRSE Ghost Assassin
    ELITE MEMBER

    Dark Geared God's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    9,012
    Rep Points
    425115508


    If you strike me down(ban me)I'll become more powerful than ever.. Don't say i don't warn you.


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 11-18-2011, 12:33 PM
  2. Drug Companies Win Two Supreme Court Decisions
    By Prince in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-24-2011, 01:05 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-20-2011, 09:33 AM
  4. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-26-2008, 01:26 PM
  5. Supreme Court
    By boilermaker in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 02-01-2006, 10:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.