Thread: LAM, is Morris full of ****?

O'Reilly might have got one in the kisser.

not according to the current electoral vote counts, a landslide would be what Obama did to McCain at 349 to 173. the decision the next couple of days will be that of tens of electoral votes and not hundreds.


Obama vs. Romney Electoral Map


Latest presidential polls: Obama opens up huge lead in projected electoral votes - Orlando News | Examiner.com

most polls over sample democrats

Originally Posted by Swiper

most polls over sample democrats

you would be thinking of the republican polls or anything from that loser Zogby.

ElectoralVote

Obama 281 Romney 206. A lot of batshit crazy in the R party this election.

WASHINGTON?President Barack Obama heads toward Election Day with an apparent lead over Republican Mitt Romney among early voters in key states that could decide the election. Obama's advantage, however, isn't as big as the one he had over John McCain four years ago, giving Romney's campaign hope that the former Massachusetts governor can erase the gap when people vote on Tuesday.
About 25 million people already have voted in 34 states and the District of Columbia. No votes will be counted until Election Day but several battleground states are releasing the party affiliation of people who have voted early.
So far, Democratic voters outnumber Republicans in Florida, Iowa, Nevada, North Carolina and Ohio - five states that could decide the election, if they voted the same way. Republicans have the edge in Colorado, which Obama won in 2008.

RealClearPolitics - 2012 Election Maps - Electoral Map

[QUOTE=LAM;2962237]not according to the current electoral vote counts, a landslide would be what Obama did to McCain at 349 to 173. the decision the next couple of days will be that of tens of electoral votes and not hundreds.

Obama vs. Romney Electoral Map


AND YOU PICK THE MAP FROM HUFFINGTON POST YOU LIBERAL NICE TRY. ROMNEY WILL WIN AND BECOME THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TUESDAY

Also to little dingdong your articles couldnt be from and bloggers or liberal websites could they.

every time you mouth off to me i put another plug in the penis of your voodoo doll

^^^i knew there was something shady about you

LAM/LW are epic liberal doucebags. Romney will wipe Obama out on election night. States that should be a given for Obama, now have them on the defensive. (pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, Minnesota)

It's true, Obamney will win by a landslide.

Originally Posted by secdrl

LAM/LW are epic liberal doucebags. Romney will wipe Obama out on election night. States that should be a given for Obama, now have them on the defensive. (pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, Minnesota)

if Obama wins you have to post a full frontal nude.

Originally Posted by Little Wing

if Obama wins you have to post a full frontal nude.

Nobody wants to see your frontal nudity thats for sure and you just want to see my penis

you're secdrl? trust me, no woman wants a broke dick

Mitt Romney's Delusions of Victory

by Matt Latimer Nov 3, 2012 4:45 AM EDT Sorry Mitt, the electoral map shows it's all over but the shouting. Ex-Bush aide Matt Latimer on what the GOP needs to do to rebuild.


"Years ago I worked on a political campaign in Michigan. We were losing, badly, but our campaign manager didn't believe it. To him, every devastating setback was a secret boost to our efforts, every sign of failure proof of our imminent victory, every poll that hurt us was rigged in favor of the other side. "They aren't going to know what hit them. We're right where we want to be." This was the constant refrain. A number of people on the campaign, especially the young and inexperienced, believed him. The rest of us didn't make many sudden movements when he was around. Still there was something endearing about his total, damn-all-the-evidence conviction. He owned his crazy. "

Originally Posted by Curt James

Dick Morris: Romney will win in a 'landslide' | Fox News Video

Dick Morris: Romney will win in a 'landslide'

Curt....

you can ask me, too. I have followed politics for 25+ years and worked in DC on Capitol Hill for a lobbyist firms. I have some insights (me thinks).

Morris was a pollster.

I read "Behind the Oval Office" about 15 years ago. (1997?)

He was a good pollster and also formulated Clinton's successful Triangulation policy after the 1994 elections.

In recent years, Morris has made his living being one of the blow-hard Fox news folks. He's written some books and they honestly, were awful. Lots of bibiography dedicated for NY Times articles.

I read about Morris's claim on a landslide.

But I did not see the data? I didn't see any polling on this.

I checked the polls today, and - if - they are all being done correctly, then it's a tight race that will be decided by a few battleground states at this point.

Dick Morris told us just the other day that Romney was even headed for a seemingly improbable win in Pennsylvania. The right-leaning RealClearPolitics lists a half-dozen recent polls in the state. Which of them have Romney ahead? Oh, none of them.
On Sean Hannity's program, an ''expert'' on Ohio predicted a Romney win in the state of 5-7 points. What poll shows this? Just one?from a Republican pollster?out of eight taken in the last week.

Karl Rove says Romney has the edge in the overall vote on Election Day and in his hedging way seemed to predict a Romney triumph. What polls show this? Again, almost none of them. Most in fact show a slight edge for Obama. The lone standout is Gallup, which for the past few weeks had shown a single-digit lead for Romney. If Gallup knows something the rest of the polling world doesn't, it will be a major news story and Gallup will cement itself as the pollster of record as it once was in its glory days. If not, what Gallup is doing to Republicans is cruel. Today they cling to those numbers tighter than Katie Holmes to her divorce lawyers.

Now in GOP circles there is boastful talk of Romney "expanding the map" into New Jersey and Michigan and Oregon. What polls have him ahead of the president in any of those states? Oh ... well, I think you're seeing my point.

Even looking at the websites that "unskew" the polls in Romney's favor, not a single one has shown the former governor with an electoral college lead over the President. Several sites, however, have Obama clearing 270 electoral votes, often with room to spare. What is propelling Team Romney and their cheerleaders in the media appears to be wishful thinking, not empirical evidence.

Originally Posted by FUZO

Also to little dingdong your articles couldnt be from and bloggers or liberal websites could they.

Conservatives Are Seeing the Beginning of the End for Romney

One of the more popular conservative blogs is redstate.com. It is getting roughly the same traffic as this site (about a quarter of a million hits a day). The founder and chief cook and bottle washer, Erick Erickson, is way to the right of Rick Perry. During the run-up to the primaries he was wildly against Romney. On Nov. 8, 2011, he wrote an editorial that is definitely worth reading if you are interested in knowing what conservatives were thinking a year ago. In part, he wrote:
"Mitt Romney, on the other hand, is a man devoid of any principles other than getting himself elected. As much as the American public does not like Barack Obama, they loath a man so fueled with ambition that he will say or do anything to get himself elected. Mitt Romney is that man.
I've been reading the 200 pages of single spaced opposition research from the John McCain campaign on Mitt Romney. There is no issue I can find on which Mitt Romney has not taken both sides. He is neither liberal nor conservative. He is simply unprincipled."

Not exactly a ringing endorsement. But during the past year, Erickson's hatred of Obama was so great that he yelled himself hoarse against Obama, for example on July 18, 2012: he wrote: "Barack Obama's administration is filled with the ignorance of America you get from liberal academics" It's been like that almost every day all year.
But yesterday something new appeared: "When I wake up on Wednesday morning, I'm still going to have my wife. I'm still going to have my kids. I'm still going to have my family. And I'm still going to have my God. So will you." Later in the piece he said: "I'm not going to think the end of the world is upon us if my side loses." From someone who hates Obama with a passion and has railed against him all year (to great cheering from the comments section), this doesn't seem like an announcement of imminent victory.

Maybe this is what they know.

http://m.washingtonpost.com/politics...a24_story.html

Originally Posted by secdrl

LAM/LW are epic liberal doucebags.

I may be a douche bag but I forget more every day than you will ever know. because you are nothing but a sheep "educated" on most things by media, which means you know next to nothing about everything.

Originally Posted by Curt James

O'Reilly might have got one in the kisser.

He should have, what an ignorant low life, he thinks hes better than every body else. Cant stand ignorance. Rush and O'Reilly should form the master race. It would consist of two people.

Originally Posted by Little Wing

. The right-leaning RealClearPolitics lists a half-dozen recent polls in the state.

When it comes to polling, how does "right leaning" matter.

I check 'real clear politics' daily and they average out all of the polls. They were spot on in 2008.

Are they right leaning? I have not noticed that. But I do not read the articles posted from various publications.

Good OP, Curt.

Because now George Will is saying this. If Morris and Will are correct, it will mean (IMO) that the way polling is done (selection of samples and samples) is being done incorrectly.

I'm a bit bemused by this, though. The polls are that off? But I do remember the exit polling in 2008 making massively wrong predictions.

George Will predicts 321-217 Romney landslide
11/04/2012

Add Washington Post George Will to the landslide column, along with Fox News Channel?s Dick Morris and the Washington Examiner?s Michael Barone.

On this weekend?s broadcast of ?This Week with George Stephanopoulos? on ABC, Will revealed his prediction and added a bonus surprise by saying traditional Democratic state Minnesota would go for Romney, as well.

?I?m projecting Minnesota to go for Romney,? Will said. ?It?s the only state that?s voted Democratic in nine consecutive elections, but this year, there?s the marriage amendment on the ballot that will bring out the evangelicals, and I think could make the difference.?


Read more: George Will predicts 321-217 Romney landslide | The Daily Caller

As a conservative, I hope Morris is 100% accurate.

As someone who's heard his predictions in the past, I wouldn't bet a plug nickle on them.

Originally Posted by ALBOB

As a conservative, I hope Morris is 100% accurate.

As someone who's heard his predictions in the past, I wouldn't bet a plug nickle on them.

By conservative do you mean fiscal conservative and/or social conservative?

I see the fiscal conservatives (myself in general) preferring Romney. Social I am all over the place and have view from both sides of the spectrum.

I prefer change this election. BO has had 4 years (and so has Bernanke).

Romney will not re-appoint Bernanke in 2014.

Well, looks like he is indeed full of crap.