Thread: How the Cookie Crumbles

Didn't anyone watch this movie?

That was sad.
I agree, Russia is a great ally, and thank god they sit next to China.
China on the other hand.. Major trading partner.. yeah. They build all of our stuff, earning bazillions a year, and they have a billion people working for breadcrumbs doing it.. Ok, so they spend 5 cookies in forced labor.. Thats the equivalent of a few hundred American cookies. The only REAL cost they face is importing materials, frankly China is a big assed threat and I hope I dont live to see the day they attack, because frankly they would probably win. Russia remains our only real hope in the scenario, and unfortunately they are NOT prepared for a landwar with China- China would undoubtedly keep the majority of their troops in Eurasia, and Russia would be first to fall. Depending on coordination, Europe may have the time to assemble the UN and decide that they will issue an order for China to give Russia back or they(meaning the US) will attack them. About then China would mop the floor with Europe, and wed send our troops overseas.. They'd arrive, get slaughtered over a 6 month period, and meanwhile that remaining few.. oh, 250million troops would sneak in onto American soil, and proceed to kill everything that moves. The only thing that could save us here on the homeland would be a highly populated NRA(LoL). Inevitably we would end up surrendering, or nuclear war would commence.


Also, Its funny how he says theres 12 million children growing up in poverty.. It would only take 2 cookies to save these SIX million starving children! So I guess what he means is- We should spend nearly the equivalent of American dollars feeding the rest of the world, as China spends(Much more effectively) toward their military per year. Also, Theres more than 12 million,"Starving" people(Not just children) in the world, we would not populate an area and say,"Sorry, you cant eat, your over 16!"Thus boosting us to about 10 cookies yearly to feed these people. Honestly? I think thats a great idea.. Imagine the image America would gain; We're looked at as this horrible, corrupt country where all anyone cares about is money.. then we do that? Not to mention wed be alot more liked im these very poor countries, which could/would stop alot of problems.. Yes, shipping out all of that money with no returns would absolutely kill our economy, by fasr more that"10 cookies" but hey..
Of course you know what would happen then.. We would help somebody that someone else didnt like.. theyd kill our aid people; we would send more aid people along with.. SEAL TEAM 5. Kill them/stop their following assault, then America would become their enemy, and they would start suicide bombing us.. And there would be some Jackass in a neutral country somewhere talking about how they dont have problems because they dont stick their noses in other peoples business(Since America polices the world.) Conveniently forgetting that if the US didnt exist, meaning the UN wouldnt exist(And their country probably wouldnt exist.. Heil Hitler) If it werent for these things.. and they didnt have an army(Ergo the neutral thing) Their ass would be invaded before they can say,"Shit, I wish we had someone to save our asses!" That is our corrupt, horrible, evil, world peace-threatening country's job.. Yes, they dont have problems because the selfish fucks dont help anyone but themselves(Sry, I cant help but think of a certain Swedish member's ridiculous posts in North Korea ask for help as I write this)

Nice resource.. lol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_country

The concept of neutrality in war is narrowly defined and puts specific constraints on the neutral party in return for the internationally recognized right to remain neutral.

And how do they remain neutral? Does god protect them?? No, The capitalist dogs do!(yes, I know the UN has actually responded to problems in the past.. usually causing more problems than they solved..)

The concept of neutrality in war is narrowly defined and puts specific constraints on the neutral party in return for the internationally recognized right to remain neutral.

And as we see, the UN is first to act in response to a problem.. they quickly assemble, demand the "bad" party,"Stop it or else" Then slam us when they dont meet the demands of the UN and we follow through.

Guess who was a neutral nation?

United States - its first president, George Washington, warned in his farewell address against permanent foreign alliances. "It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world..."

Then we got bombed, and wised up.. ya'know why? Because there wasnt an America to come save us when we needed it! Although, before that at least we were secure due to a strongly held second amendment.. Of course, when our homeland hasnt seen war on our doorstep for so long, we forgot these things, and moved to become,"Civilized" IE- defenseless. The root of all of this is the,"melting pot" effect; we brought in, and let in trash from all over the world. Want an effective stereo type for someone? Look at the country they come from. Not to mention the following horrible parenting that has occurred, now every other minority individual has acute DAMD, and gets insane with anger(Due to DAMD) and shoots anyone that looks at his,"bitch" wrong. Sadly, "Its popular"

Many countries made such declarations during World War II. Most became, however, occupied, and in the end only Ireland, Sweden and Switzerland remained neutral of the countries closest to the war. Their fulfillment to the letter of the rules of neutrality have been questioned: Ireland supplied some important secret information to the Allies; for instance, the date of D-Day was decided on the basis of incoming Atlantic weather information supplied by Ireland. Sweden and Switzerland, as embedded within Nazi Germany and her associates, similarly made some concessions to Nazi requests.

More proof this is true; and more proof that Sweden is an asshole. They tried to stay on Hitler's good side by not fighting him.(and apparently even,"bent over" to help him) OK! Good call! Guess what would have happened to Sweden if not for the terrorist nation of America??
As for the rest of the neutral nations.. WOW, you mean these invading parties didnt honor your wish to not go to war?? Amazing! Instead of neutral, perhaps we should call them,"welfare nations" Since all they do is drain our economy when the time comes. BETTER YET! We should call them,"Targets" If you dont want to help defend the world from aggressive nations, then the world will not defend you. In fact, the UN wont even frown upon any country that invades you; good luck!
I realize there was no UN around this time, but They could have banded together and had a better chance realizing their situations. Furthermore, these,"Neutral" nations would not have given these countries back after they took the Nazi's out of them; it would have become their territory; unlike evil America's.
So in conclusion, Im horribly off topic

Oh yeah.. Isnt this guy a part of some other dumbass group which among its other incredibly ignorant idealisms, wanted to stop the militarization of space(To stop,"Star Wars" from occurring?) Good idea! Lets avoid that.. That would cause ALL other nations will follow our lead! Why would they militarize space if we didnt?? Granted, The US would undoubtedly fck that up too. We would send ours up.. they would send theirs up 20 years later.. so we would make ours bigger..
It SHOULD be more like this: We send ours up. We tell the world if they try to send any military-related crafts, or anything into space well destroy it, and repave their nation with an orbital ION cannon(Which would be really cool to have..) Plus the control of space would, in fact, actually ensure America's security from other nations. Whether it be a really cool laser cannon, or just Space to Earth missiles(Which would be very hard to stop.. nobody has missile defenses aimed to stop missiles descending completely vertically.) It would certainly be a deterrent. Sadly, also very cost-inneffective right now as well.

While I do agree with some of this organizations ideas, their plan on how to get the money is a bit sketchy, and therefore considered reckless(to me) until I see how, and where they plan to take 400 billion from the pentagon.. Also remember.. The pentagon's 40 cookies.. They dont eat those all themselves; Those 40 cookies a year just pass through the pentagon; they are in charge of alot of things aside from "building new jets, subs, and nukes"(lol)

coooookie monsterrrrrr!!!!!!

He just wants to curb the pork in the military budget and give 50 Billion to solve alot of America's problems.

As far as Star Wars, Hubbel could very well be, ever used a magnifying glass to concentrate the Sun?