Thread: Everyone needs this book!

Why's it gotta be a white thing?









(OK, I just can't figure out how to emphasize the sarcasm in that statement. You'll just have to trust me, it's there. )

wonder if it's 30% off because nobody buys it

Its people like Michael Moore that lost the election for JK.

You read this DG?

No I found it while looking on Bob Barr's website.

I heard it was a pretty funny book. I think my brother read it and was telling me about it. I would call it "Micheal Moore is a stupid fat piece of shit."

I think everyone should read this book too:

Originally Posted by I Are Baboon

I think everyone should read this book too:

HAHAHA, that is a great book. My brother has it. It is really funny.

This is a more interesting book:- http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS...368517-0523275

I don't think I dislike anyone more than Michael Moore.

Makes me sick that the country made him rich.

He may be white and fat, but he is not stupid.

Originally Posted by redspy

This is a more interesting book:- http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS...368517-0523275

how about this one: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=books

Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio

how about this one: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=books

I love liberal conspiracy theories.

you must also love incompetent presidents.

Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio

you must also love incompetent presidents.

no, never did like clinton.

Originally Posted by busyLivin

no, never did like clinton.

I did, I especially liked how he banged his intern.

Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio

you must also love incompetent presidents.

Nah, not at all. Nice try though, Rob.

Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio

I did, I especially liked how he banged his intern.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=books

Last book I read^

Politics? Phooey!

This was a good book. http://www.davedraper.com/Merchant2/...tegory_Code=BT

Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio

how about this one: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=books

This is my current read - http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS...368517-0523275

Most of you need to put this one down, once in a while:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS...839960-7554234

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/cus...nDate&n=283155

"How can you expect Saddam to accept inspections if the inspectors are CIA agents trying to assasintate him?"

http://oilendgame.org/ExecutiveSummary.html

Two centuries ago, the first industrial revolution made people a hundred times more productive, harnessed fossil energy for transport and production, and nurtured the young U.S. economy. Then, over the past 145 years, the Age of Oil brought unprecedented mobility, globe-spanning military power, and amazing synthetic products.

But at what cost? Oil, which created the sinews of our strength, is now becoming an even greater source of weakness: its volatile price erodes prosperity; its vulnerabilities undermine security; its emissions destabilize climate. Moreover the quest to attain oil creates dangerous new rivalries and tarnishes America's moral standing. All these costs are rising. And their root causes—most of all, inefficient light trucks and cars—also threaten the competitiveness of U.S. automaking and other key industrial sectors.

The cornerstone of the next industrial revolution is therefore winning the Oil Endgame. And surprisingly, it will cost less to displace all of the oil that the United States now uses than it will cost to buy that oil. Oil's current market price leaves out its true costs to the economy, national security, and the environment. But even without including these now "externalized" costs, it would still be profitable to displace oil completely over the next few decades. In fact, by 2025, the annual economic benefit of that displacement would be $130 billion gross (or $70 billion net of the displacement's costs). To achieve this does not require a revolution, but merely consolidating and accelerating trends already in place: the amount of oil the economy uses for each dollar of GDP produced, and the fuel efficiency of light vehicles, would need only to improve about three-fifths as quickly as they did in response to previous oil shocks.