Thread: Newt in 2008

Newt wouldn't stand a chance against Hilary, try again.

Originally Posted by Dale Mabry

Newt wouldn't stand a chance against Hilary, try again.

Billary is never going to be president. S/he is too liberal.

Originally Posted by Dale Mabry

Newt wouldn't stand a chance against Hilary, try again.

I think he would beat her.

I would defenantly vote for hilary...!

Hilary would beat Newt hands down, no one likes him, he is too conservative, and the women could uprise to vote Hilary in. The key for the Repubs is a more moderate conservative since I feel Bush will mess it up the next four years. Not necessarily because conservatism is bad, but because he is incapable. Like I said, John McCain will be the man and if he is, he has my vote, Giuliana I am 50/50 on, I wouldn't vote for Newt.

Ya know, DG, i think you were just missing all the bitterness and arguments we had before the election. I thought we were gonna have some time off from this!

LOL, you just love it, huh.

Newt is okay, McCain is better, Guiliani is best.

We'll see what happens.

Originally Posted by du510

Ya know, DG, i think you were just missing all the bitterness and arguments we had before the election. I thought we were gonna have some time off from this!

LOL, you just love it, huh.

Newt is okay, McCain is better, Guiliani is best.

We'll see what happens.

Yep!
McCain is liberal. He should be a democrat. Guiliani hsan't done much IMO and doesn't deserve to be pres. Although I think the repubs could do better, I would vote Newt over the other two.

I pray for the democratic party to nominate Hillary. The bitch would NEVER win.. no matter who the republican candidate was.

I'd vote for Newt over Guiliani or McCain, too.

Originally Posted by QuestionGuy

I would defenantly vote for hilary...!

Why would you vote for him?

Originally Posted by cfs3

Why would you vote for him?

Originally Posted by dg806

Guiliani hsan't done much IMO and doesn't deserve to be pres.

Finally, someone who makes sense. Somebody tell me what good Giuliani has ever done. I don't think what he did during 9/11 was all that impressive, I think anyone could have done the same, if not a better, job.

Originally Posted by Dale Mabry

Finally, someone who makes sense. Somebody tell me what good Giuliani has ever done. I don't think what he did during 9/11 was all that impressive, I think anyone could have done the same, if not a better, job.

You ever been to NYC? Before and after his reign? Its a different city now.

Yeah I've been to the Apple. It's a pigsty and I count the minutes until I can get the hell out of that mess. Don't get upset you asked.

Originally Posted by jack52

Yeah I've been to the Apple. It's a pigsty and I count the minutes until I can get the hell out of that mess. Don't get upset you asked.

But there is a huge difference between the pre-Guiliani NYC and the post-Guiliani NYC. Perhaps I see more of what he did because Im close and read the NYC papers, but he did do a hell of a lot for his city.

LOL, Im not upset. Why would I be? Because you didnt give the answer I expected? Im a better debater than that.

You may be a cunning linguist, but Im a master debater.

Originally Posted by Dale Mabry

The key for the Repubs is a more moderate conservative.

That is absolutely INcorrect. Every single time the Repubs have leaned toward the left to try to bring in the "swing" voters they've lost their base and hence, the election. What the Repubs need to do is become MORE conservative. Just two short months ago we proved that, given a choice between a hardline Conservative and a hard line Liberal, the Conservative wins. Our nation is being hijacked by people that would turn us into a Socialist society and most of us are damn sick and tired of it. No, we will NOT become more moderate, we are going to WIN.

I agree this guy can certainly do things better than the past fools have. ANd he can lose his ass and grow a new one

Originally Posted by Dale Mabry

Hilary would beat Newt hands down, no one likes him, he is too conservative, and the women could uprise to vote Hilary in. The key for the Repubs is a more moderate conservative since I feel Bush will mess it up the next four years. Not necessarily because conservatism is bad, but because he is incapable. Like I said, John McCain will be the man and if he is, he has my vote, Giuliana I am 50/50 on, I wouldn't vote for Newt.

I would bet my house, my car, my office that Newt would beat Hilary.

I am not a Newt fan, but he is much, much more electable.

hilarious

Originally Posted by ALBOB

That is absolutely INcorrect. Every single time the Repubs have leaned toward the left to try to bring in the "swing" voters they've lost their base and hence, the election. What the Repubs need to do is become MORE conservative. Just two short months ago we proved that, given a choice between a hardline Conservative and a hard line Liberal, the Conservative wins. Our nation is being hijacked by people that would turn us into a Socialist society and most of us are damn sick and tired of it. No, we will NOT become more moderate, we are going to WIN.

This laughable. So you are saying that the repub base is going to vote in a deomcrat over a liberal republican? So the church and morals group is going to vote out of spite simply because one of their own went a little more towards teh center? I think not. The reason in past that repubs lost their seat wasn't because they went more towards the center, it was because the hardline conservative before them fucked it up for everyone. Much like I imagine you will be seeing if Bush doesn't get his shit together. Look at Ronald Reagan. He was a great president and that alone got Bush Sr elected. Bush Jr has been anything but a great president.

Originally Posted by Dale Mabry

This laughable. So you are saying that the repub base is going to vote in a deomcrat over a liberal republican? So the church and morals group is going to vote out of spite simply because one of their own went a little more towards teh center? I think not. The reason in past that repubs lost their seat wasn't because they went more towards the center, it was because the hardline conservative before them fucked it up for everyone. Much like I imagine you will be seeing if Bush doesn't get his shit together. Look at Ronald Reagan. He was a great president and that alone got Bush Sr elected. Bush Jr has been anything but a great president.

Nope, that's not at all what I'm saying. Go back and check your history. When the Republican platform moves more toward the center the voting base splits between all the moderate Republican candidates. But when there's ONE, hard right candidate, he gets the full backing of the Republican voters. Bush the elder lost because he wasn't conservative ENOUGH and Ross Perot got enough of what should have been his base for Clinton to win the election. Regan was hardline conservative and won in landslides. Bush the elder won the first time on Regan's coattails but lost re-election because he wasn't conservative enough and let Clinton, a moderate Liberal, and Perot, a conservative, steal some of his base. Dole also lost because he TRIED to be a moderate Republican. The current Bush has won twice because he's a hardline Conservative.

Originally Posted by jack52

Yeah I've been to the Apple. It's a pigsty and I count the minutes until I can get the hell out of that mess.

You don't like the smell of garbage and urine?

Originally Posted by Dale Mabry

This laughable. So you are saying that the repub base is going to vote in a deomcrat over a liberal republican? So the church and morals group is going to vote out of spite simply because one of their own went a little more towards teh center? I think not.

I thought he was saying that a moderate conservative loses the enthusiasm of alot of republicans. They don't give as much, volunteer as much and may even skip voting...these things do more damage than one vote anyways.

Newt will NEVER get my vote - unless the republican party can figure out a way to steal it...

Take Care, John H.

Originally Posted by Pepper

I thought he was saying that a moderate conservative loses the enthusiasm of alot of republicans. They don't give as much, volunteer as much and may even skip voting...these things do more damage than one vote anyways.

Not my FIRST point, but a very good point, none-the-less.

Dont count that wicked Hillary out. Remember 53% of America is woman. I for one would love to see a conservative woman run for Pres on the Republican ticket. I'd vote for that right girl in a heartbeat.

But it aint gonna be that bomb-throwing, flag-burning, baby-killing, commie, liberal, cop & soldier hating, manifesto-reading, malignant mother fucker Hillary!.................................Rich

Originally Posted by Rich46yo

mother fucker Hillary!.................................Rich

Hilary's bi-sexual? Cool she's got my vote, maybe if she's president she'll make it a trend for all women to be bi-sexual