Thread: Michael Jackson

The only reason I hope he's not guilty is because then those kids were never molested. Thats the only reason I hope he's not.



Other than that they could put him in front of a firing squad and I would not bat an eye.

I heard all this yesterday. Doesn't sound good for him at all. But one thing I don't understand is why the prosecution would tell all this. Normally they would not hint at what all they had and give them time to respond to the allegations. I wonder if this is an attempt by kids parents to ruin him by bad publicity?

Theres a very good reason why the prosecution would "tell all this", and no-ones knows who the leak is right? In a Hollywood trial you have to pre-empt the legal dream team the superstar shit-head is inevitably going to assemble to keep his kiddie raping ass out of jail. Besides a certain amount of info about any case is exposed at pre-trial hearings anyway especially the ones that establish probable cause.

Metal V if you think luring little boys with cancer into your house, getting them drunk with booze, and then talking them into jacking you off, jacking themselves off, looking at porn, sleeping and cuddling with them. And then falling head into heels love with them, isnt MOLESTATION? Well then I dont want you babysitting my kid.

My opinion? They will get a few blacks on the jury and theres no way they will convict this little fucking ass maggot. Eventually the parents will sue and make millions, and I can only assume this was their initial goal anyways. Why else would they troll their kids to a known pedophile?........This Micheal Jackson is one strange bird..................Rich

Originally Posted by Rich46yo

Metal V if you think luring little boys with cancer into your house, getting them drunk with booze, and then talking them into jacking you off, jacking themselves off, looking at porn, sleeping and cuddling with them. And then falling head into heels love with them, isnt MOLESTATION? Well then I dont want you babysitting my kid.
Rich

I think what he meant to say that he hopes the boys were never abused.

Originally Posted by min0 lee

I think what he meant to say that he hopes the boys were never abused.

Yeah right.... ..."never abused"

Originally Posted by Rich46yo

Metal V if you think luring little boys with cancer into your house, getting them drunk with booze, and then talking them into jacking you off, jacking themselves off, looking at porn, sleeping and cuddling with them. And then falling head into heels love with them, isnt MOLESTATION? Well then I dont want you babysitting my kid.

Man........why, oh why must you always misinterprate what I say??? Im not going to bother explaining it, believe what you want. Min0 understood. Why cant you? You're still a hero of mine, but.......oh well, believe what you want.

Metal I like you too dude. But you have to be careful what you say. "Not abused"? "Not molested"? C'mon man, what the hell is that supposed to mean? I guess I input things in legal terms. And according to these reports those children were most definitely "molested".

.............Rich

Well yeah, I try to be concise I guess. I just mean that I hope he never did molest those kids. Not for HIS sake, but for theirs. Nothing burns me up more than a pedophile. NOTHING.

I realize that that will mean all the accusations are trumped up, and the kids and their mother are lying..... so I guess there's really no good out for those boys in that sense because then that means the mother is abusing them by making them lie and commit perjury. Damn. Its all a big mess. Those kids suffer either way. Damn.



Irregardless of the fact of whether Michael is or isnt a pedophile, he is most definately sick and he does show all the characteristics of a pedophile. If he hasnt acted on it (which I doubt) then he will soon. If he openly admits to liking to sleep with young boys (like he did on the Brashear film) then he is nothing more than a ticking time bomb and he should be the victim of a very unfortunate natural accident. A bolt of lightining would do fine.

Michael's guilty - that's all I have to say.

Originally Posted by mousie

Michael's guilty - that's all I have to say.

*sigh*......yup. I also believe he is. Im in favor of the death penalty for pedohiles, BTW.

Originally Posted by Rich46yo

My opinion? They will get a few blacks on the jury and theres no way they will convict this little fucking ass maggot. Rich

I'm pretty sure your referring to the OJ trial with this one. If Michael Jackson does get off, it will be for the same reason OJ did; because he is filthy rich, not because of his color. Speaking of color, I think this ghoulish freak stopped being black 2 decades ago.
It's all about money. If two regular dudes, black or white, did what OJ and Jackson have done they'd both be in prison or in the electric chair. If you're looking for a black guy to blame, try Johnny Cochran, who represents the low life lawyers who defend the sloppy rich criminals of all races.

Originally Posted by Mreman

I'm pretty sure your referring to the OJ trial with this one. If Michael Jackson does get off, it will be for the same reason OJ did; because he is filthy rich, not because of his color. Speaking of color, I think this ghoulish freak stopped being black 2 decades ago.
It's all about money. If two regular dudes, black or white, did what OJ and Jackson have done they'd both be in prison or in the electric chair. If you're looking for a black guy to blame, try Johnny Cochran, who represents the low life lawyers who defend the sloppy rich criminals of all races.

I could not have put this better myself. Bravo.

Originally Posted by Mreman

I'm pretty sure your referring to the OJ trial with this one. If Michael Jackson does get off, it will be for the same reason OJ did; because he is filthy rich, not because of his color. Speaking of color, I think this ghoulish freak stopped being black 2 decades ago.
It's all about money. If two regular dudes, black or white, did what OJ and Jackson have done they'd both be in prison or in the electric chair. If you're looking for a black guy to blame, try Johnny Cochran, who represents the low life lawyers who defend the sloppy rich criminals of all races.

Sorry, but its not that easily explained. Of course the thousand or so trials Ive sat in on over the last 20+ years give me no level of expertise to comment with.......................... ...................Rich

Originally Posted by Rich46yo

"Not abused"? "Not molested"? C'mon man, what the hell is that supposed to mean?

He wishes that they were not, how is that difficult to interpret?

Originally Posted by Mreman

If Michael Jackson does get off, it will be for the same reason OJ did; because he is filthy rich, not because of his color.

Not sure that is true anymore, last I heard he was in debt.

Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio

Not sure that is true anymore, last I heard he was in debt.

He is in debt.. he doesnt even have the rights to the beetles songs, the banks do. He is done for.

Originally Posted by PreMier

He is in debt.. he doesnt even have the rights to the beetles songs, the banks do. He is done for.

sad too, the guy had hundreds of millions at one time, maybe Michael can hook up with Tyson, they are both sick and bad with money!