IronMagLabs Osta Rx


More on Flag Burning

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 42 of 42
  1. #31
    Windy City
    ELITE MEMBER

    Big Smoothy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    4,969
    Rep Points
    103066337


    One of the reason the U.S. Contistution and legal system and style of government is the best, or one of the best in the world, is that people have right to burn their nation's flag as a means of political expression.

    If this Amendment passes, it will set a precedent.

    Slippery slope.
    Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first.

    Mark Twain

  2. #32
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    Pepper's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,545
    Rep Points
    3875126

    I agree with you that this amendment is BAD but...
    1) it has NO CHANCE of getting through the Senate and everyone knows that. So it is really just symbollic.
    2) I despise "slipperry slope" as an arguement...it is a coward's arguement (not calling you a coward, mind you.)
    My Carb Cycling Progress - you can't hide from the numbers.

  3. #33
    Windy City
    ELITE MEMBER

    Big Smoothy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    4,969
    Rep Points
    103066337


    Quote Originally Posted by Pepper
    I agree with you that this amendment is BAD but...
    1) it has NO CHANCE of getting through the Senate and everyone knows that. So it is really just symbollic.
    Pepper:

    I doubt it will pass Senate, but it is still going to go to the Senate.

    I do agree that there is a lot of symoblism in the Amendment, and the 9/11 attacks are - again - part of it going to the House in the first place.

    2) I despise "slipperry slope" as an arguement...it is a coward's arguement (not calling you a coward, mind you.)
    I do think it's a slippery slope in two areas:

    1. A Constitutional Amendment, once passed, must then be technically reversed by passing another Amendment to nullify it. Which will never happen if there is a flag burning Amendment at the Consitutional level.

    2. This will be a precedent.



    This does not have to be, and should not be, a federal issue. It's because approximately 46 states or so, had there state laws banning flag burning which originated during Vietnam war protests overturned by the Supreme Court in 1989.


    We are the best....because of the freedom we (used) to have.
    Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first.

    Mark Twain

  4. #34
    %
    ELITE MEMBER

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    2,051
    Rep Points
    114880

    Quote Originally Posted by LAM
    why should the same monies that are passed on from generation to generation be constantly taxed time and time again ?
    I know this is off the topic I started, but inheritance money should be taxed for the ultra-rich b/c it preserves our democracy. It's not all monies--money inherited by a spouse passes tax free and only the sibs of the super rich were subject to the estate tax.

    Just as anti-trust laws function, the estate tax battled the snowballing of ludicrously excessive wealth and power in the hands of a few which inexorably leads to undemocratic/fascist results....unchecked accumulation power/money necessarily interferes w/ the democratic process. Here's why:

    We live in a democratic republic and everything is political. Political power can sometimes be equated w/ money (instead of the strength of ideas) and those with the most money have the loudest political voice to the detriment of others. That is fundamentally anti-democratic and un-american. Not everyone paid the estate tax, only those like the Hiltons, Bushs and Perots--nice to know so many want to preserve their wealth in perpetuity.

    I think I just fell off my soapbox reaching for my whiskey...and it's only 8:30

  5. #35
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    Pepper's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,545
    Rep Points
    3875126

    The comparision to anti-trust laws is, at best, a HUGE stretch.

    The anti-trust laws are their to protect consumers from monopolies NOT to limit the weath of corporations.

    In reality, the estate tax is really a voluntary tax. Those with any resources at all hire accountants and lawyers and spend their middle-age years arranging their affairs so that no estate tax is paid.

    So, I start an accounting practice I pay taxes:
    1. income taxes on my income
    2. self-employment taxes on my income.
    3. sales tax on the the things I buy.
    4. city license fees on my revenue
    5. gas taxes on the fuel in my truck

    and now, when I want to die, the IRS wants ONE MORE BITE at the apple? And this is fair to you? I submit that this is "fair" only because it hits people other than you.
    My Carb Cycling Progress - you can't hide from the numbers.

  6. #36
    Windy City
    ELITE MEMBER

    Big Smoothy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    4,969
    Rep Points
    103066337


    ^ This could be started as another important thread.
    Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first.

    Mark Twain

  7. #37
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    Pepper's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,545
    Rep Points
    3875126

    and...by the way, it does not apply to me either. I am nowhere near the point of having to worry about estate taxes. I hope to be one day though.

    Actually, I hope there is no estate tax to worry about for anyone.

    My best guess is that there will be a $10 million exemption and estate taxes on the excess.
    My Carb Cycling Progress - you can't hide from the numbers.

  8. #38
    %
    ELITE MEMBER

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    2,051
    Rep Points
    114880

    Quote Originally Posted by Pepper
    The comparision to anti-trust laws is, at best, a HUGE stretch.
    Not the spirit of the anti-trust laws

    Quote Originally Posted by Pepper
    The anti-trust laws are their to protect consumers from monopolies NOT to limit the weath of corporations..
    And just how do you think those corporations have the ability to become monopolies in the first place? Corporations that destroy the free market through unfair business practices are not your local mom 'n pop dry goods store. Just as major corporations can damage the free market, the aristocratic rise in the upper upper class can damage our democracy. The exercise of massive accumulated wealth will have that effect. If you haven't noticed that, then you haven't been paying attention. When's the last time anyone could meet w/ his state congressman w/out a $5,000 check in his hand?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pepper
    In reality, the estate tax is really a voluntary tax. Those with any resources at all hire accountants and lawyers and spend their middle-age years arranging their affairs so that no estate tax is paid...
    You are balls out correct on this one Pepper. As Leona Helmsley sp? said, "Taxes are for the little people." (Incidentally, government subsidized business, a' la Bush et. al., is one of the biggest wealth transfers to the wealthy out there.)


    Quote Originally Posted by Pepper
    and now, when I want to die, the IRS wants ONE MORE BITE at the apple? And this is fair to you? I submit that this is "fair" only because it hits people other than you.
    Pepper, the estate tax applied only to millionaires. Now it doesn't exist. If you're planning on passing on that type of money, well congratulations on your business acumen.

    A democracy is rather fragile--everyone has a voice. The reduction of this country to 3rd world status, meaning only 2 classes--rich and poor--is fast becoming a reality. We left the feudal caste in England many years ago. But it's on the comeback.

  9. #39
    %
    ELITE MEMBER

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    2,051
    Rep Points
    114880

    Quote Originally Posted by Pepper
    I submit that this is "fair" only because it hits people other than you.
    I am a lawyer and the estate tax would surely hit me. Don't assume everyone acts out base self-interest.

  10. #40
    Elite Kiki
    ELITE MEMBER

    BigDyl's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Securityland
    Posts
    15,750
    Rep Points
    9693948

    The problem is that there is only 2 partities... and both are owned by the same group of people................
    Quote Originally Posted by kbm8795 View Post
    Oh, I think Americans understand that the one thing conservatives hate the most is the idea of spending American tax money on Americans. . .in America.


    Your tax money is safe. . .in Iraq.
    Total ownage.

  11. #41
    %
    ELITE MEMBER

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    2,051
    Rep Points
    114880

    "I personally do not believe in burning the flag. It's a personal belief, but I'll tell you something, I think people are overreacting, oh, just a little bit.

    "Hey buddy, my daddy died for that flag." Well, I bought mine. Sorry. You know they sell them at K-Mart for three bucks, you're in, you're out, brand new flag, no violence was necessary.

    "Hey buddy, my daddy died in the Korean war for that flag." What a coincidence - my flag was made in Korea!"

    --Bill Hicks

  12. #42
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Meadville, Pa.
    Posts
    2,786
    Rep Points
    16897631

    Quote Originally Posted by Decker
    WASHINGTON - The House moved Wednesday toward approval of a constitutional amendment that would give Congress the power to ban desecration of the American flag, a measure that for the first time stands a chance of passing the Senate as well. Source: AP

    Good to see Congress take the initiative on something really important.

    When buddhist monks were short of firewood, they burned statues of the Buddha.

    The magic is not in the symbol. Symbol minded.

    Hi Decker,

    I AM a war veteran. And have served my country well alongside many good Men and saw some of my best buddies die. And a lot injured and effected by this for the rest of their lives...

    I feel personally anyone should be able to express themselves as they wish including the burning of the flag. It is their expression of their feelings honestly. To me burning the flag by one does NOT take away the importance and meaning of the flag at all and shows no disrespect to any Man that has served or given his life for his country. We fought for all people's freedoms. Including to express themselves however they feel they can do that.

    Remember no matter how many flags are burned they make new ones every day. And the only way someone can "disrespect" the flag is if you "let" them (that is YOU mentally allow them to do that within yourself and your actions following such incidents)...

    Take Care, John H.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. The Fat-Burning Zone: News On Burning Fat
    By Prince in forum Training
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-25-2011, 01:03 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-27-2011, 01:52 PM
  3. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-04-2007, 12:04 PM
  4. A little flag for ya.........
    By Rusty in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-09-2003, 07:04 AM
  5. Pic of Flag
    By Erilaya in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-13-2002, 04:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.