Thread: Fat or Skinny?

Skinny. They tend to live longer/healthier lives.

and generally more attractive too

Skinny because I enjoy the pleasure of bulking then cutting up.

In the past I wanted to be an endomorph....As I was the definition of an ectomorph. I realize now that I enjoy food immensely and wouldn't be able to consume the vast amounts that I do if I were an endomorph.

So I vote ectomorph.

it is actually healthier to be slightly overweight than underweight. most people who are underweight have severe nutritional defecencies

I would much rather be naturally skinny... It's a pain in the ass to have to weigh my celery to make sure I don't gain weight

I'd rather be naturally skinny than fat.

What are you meaning by 'skinny'? What bodyweight to height ratio?

he means about 5'9 140lbs.

Originally Posted by LAM

it is actually healthier to be slightly overweight than underweight. most people who are underweight have severe nutritional defecencies

you're more likely to live longer if you are slightly underweight. it's well established that a calorie restricted diet lets people live longer, and it's been shown conclusively in mice.

Originally Posted by mrmark

you're more likely to live longer if you are slightly underweight. it's well established that a calorie restricted diet lets people live longer, and it's been shown conclusively in mice.

Yes, mice are VERY close relatives of humans. (I'm not really arguing either way...)

Lookit all those chinese people who live to be over 100...

They always look like gnarled tree branches

Originally Posted by themamasan

In the past I wanted to be an endomorph....As I was the definition of an ectomorph. I realize now that I enjoy food immensely and wouldn't be able to consume the vast amounts that I do if I were an endomorph.

So I vote ectomorph.

Amen .

Originally Posted by The Monkey Man

Lookit all those chinese people who live to be over 100...

They always look like gnarled tree branches

And they are always wracked with full body arthritis, and muscle wasting

Originally Posted by The Monkey Man

Lookit all those chinese people who live to be over 100...

They always look like gnarled tree branches

Most of the food over in China/Japan is much healthier than what we(majority of Americans) have here.

Originally Posted by The Monkey Man

Lookit all those chinese people who live to be over 100...

They always look like gnarled tree branches

You're a gnarled tree branch.

Originally Posted by BigDyl

You're a gnarled tree branch.

Damn, you cut deep into people's feelings don't you? I guess it's all part of being emo.

Those are some pretty Gnarly comments

Originally Posted by Seanp156

Yes, mice are VERY close relatives of humans. (I'm not really arguing either way...)

http://fractogene.com/full_genome/r_evolution.html

Originally Posted by squanto

http://fractogene.com/full_genome/r_evolution.html

"1) It does not mean that homo sapiens is 99% identical to mouse. It has also been revealed, that the mouse DNA is at least 10% less information, compared to the human DNA."

Evolution is a crock of shit anyway.

Originally Posted by Seanp156

Evolution is a crock of shit anyway.

You really believe evolution is a crock of shit?

Originally Posted by CowPimp

You really believe evolution is a crock of shit?

Some concepts yes, some no. I believe natural selection can create new traits/characteristic within a given species, but I don't believe that it's possible for species to cross-over into one another (with a few exceptions like mules/donkeys whatever, but they can't breed).

Originally Posted by Seanp156

Some concepts yes, some no. I believe natural selection can create new traits/characteristic within a given species, but I don't believe that it's possible for species to cross-over into one another (with a few exceptions like mules/donkeys whatever, but they can't breed).

I've never heard of this crossing-over thing. Maybe coincidentally it seems like that sometimes, but evolution is essentially natural selection/survival of the fittest in aciton. Or is there something I'm missing?

Originally Posted by CowPimp

I've never heard of this crossing-over thing. Maybe coincidentally it seems like that sometimes, but evolution is essentially natural selection/survival of the fittest in aciton. Or is there something I'm missing?

I'm just refering to the old concept (maybe this is way outdated now) that all forms of life evolved from a single celled organism etc....

Whatever, this is a boring topic, and I'm on break... I'm officially setting my brain at idle for the week .

lets just analyze the two scenarios for a second.

ectomorph-skinny dude who can't gain weight.
solution-eat burgers, fries, pizza, steak basically anything with lots of calories and make sure you eat enough protein and good fats.

endomorph-fat fuck who can't lose the belly.
solution-be conscious of what you put into your body 24/7 as that is the only healthy way to get fat off and keep it off.

hhhmmm, looks like a simple choice to me

Originally Posted by mrmark

you're more likely to live longer if you are slightly underweight. it's well established that a calorie restricted diet lets people live longer, and it's been shown conclusively in mice.

living longer does not neccessarily equate having to a better quality of life...