IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum


Go Back   IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum > General Interests Forums > Open Chat
Photo Gallery Register Members List Videos Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Open Chat General adult talk about life, relationships or whatever you want to discuss.

Sponsored by: HumaneVoLabs.com


Hard Evidence of U.S. Torturing Prisoners to Death


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2005, 01:02 PM   #1
Elite Kiki
Elite Member
 
BigDyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Securityland
Posts: 15,742
Photos: 2

Hard Evidence of U.S. Torturing Prisoners to Death

Hard Evidence of U.S. Torturing Prisoners to Death Ignored by Corporate Media

Military autopsy reports provide indisputable proof that detainees are being tortured to death while in US military custody. Yet the US corporate media are covering it with the seriousness of a garage sale for the local Baptist Church.

A recent American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) posting of one of forty-four US military autopsy reports reads as follows: "Final Autopsy Report: DOD 003164, (Detainee) Died as a result of asphyxia (lack of oxygen to the brain) due to strangulation as evidenced by the recently fractured hyoid bone in the neck and soft tissue hemorrhage extending downward to the level of the right thyroid cartilage. Autopsy revealed bone fracture, rib fractures, contusions in mid abdomen, back and buttocks extending to the left flank, abrasions, lateral buttocks. Contusions, back of legs and knees; abrasions on knees, left fingers and encircling to left wrist. Lacerations and superficial cuts, right 4th and 5th fingers. Also, blunt force injuries, predominately recent contusions (bruises) on the torso and lower extremities. Abrasions on left wrist are consistent with use of restraints. No evidence of defense injuries or natural disease. Manner of death is homicide. Whitehorse Detainment Facility, Nasiriyah, Iraq."

The ACLU website further reveals how: "a 27-year-old Iraqi male died while being interrogated by Navy Seals on April 5, 2004, in Mosul, Iraq. During his confinement he was hooded, flex-cuffed, sleep deprived and subjected to hot and cold environmental conditions, including the use of cold water on his body and hood. The exact cause of death was "undetermined" although the autopsy stated that hypothermia may have contributed to his death.

Another Iraqi detainee died on January 9, 2004, in Al Asad, Iraq, while being interrogated. He was standing, shackled to the top of a doorframe with a gag in his mouth, at the time he died. The cause of death was asphyxia and blunt force injuries.

So read several of the 44 US military autopsy reports on the ACLU website -evidence of extensive abuse of US detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan 2002 through 2004. Anthony Romero, Executive Director of ACLU stated, "There is no question that US interrogations have resulted in deaths." ACLU attorney Amrit Sing adds, "These documents present irrefutable evidence that US operatives tortured detainees to death during interrogations."

Additionally, ACLU reports that in April 2003, Secretary Rumsfeld authorized the use of "environmental manipulation" as an interrogation technique in Guantánamo Bay. In September 2003, Lt. Gen. Sanchez also authorized this technique for use in Iraq. So responsibility for these human atrocities goes directly to the highest levels of power.

A press release on these deaths by torture was issued by the ACLU on October 25, 2005 and was immediately picked up by Associated Press and United Press International wire services, making the story available to US corporate media nationwide. A thorough check of Nexus-Lexus and Proquest electronic data bases, using the keywords ACLU and autopsy, showed that at least 95percent of the daily papers in the US didn't bother to pick up the story. The Los Angeles Times covered the story on page A-4 with a 635-word report headlined "Autopsies Support Abuse Allegations." Fewer than a dozen other daily newspapers including: Bangor Daily News, Maine, page 8; Telegraph-Herald, Dubuque Iowa, page 6; Charleston Gazette, page 5; Advocate, Baton Rouge, page 11; and a half dozen others actually covered the story. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and the Seattle Times buried the story inside general Iraq news articles. USA Today posted the story on their website. MSNBC posted the story to their website, but apparently did not consider it newsworthy enough to air on television.

"The Randi Rhodes Show," on Air America Radio, covered the story. AP/UPI news releases and direct quotes from the ACLU website appeared widely on internet sites and on various news-based listservs around the world, including Common Dreams, Truthout, New Standard, Science Daily, and numerous others.






Quote:
Originally Posted by kbm8795 View Post
Oh, I think Americans understand that the one thing conservatives hate the most is the idea of spending American tax money on Americans. . .in America.


Your tax money is safe. . .in Iraq.
Total ownage.
BigDyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 01:32 PM   #2
primeau
 
lnvanry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,035
Photos: 12

IMO cruel and unusual punishment should and MUST be done in order to obtain better intel, which has been root of several problems. If a few (most likely guilty but some innocent as well) muslims must be totured for our cause and intel the so be it; however, we don't need to let this leak out. In the past soldiers took pics...WTF! Keep that shit under wraps. I'm sure this is approach we are going to take anyway. We will do whatever is necessary to get our intel and will continue to use whatever methods work...we will be much more secretive about it too... Some people have commit the greatest sins so the many can live in peace at the cost of a few.
lnvanry is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 02:05 PM   #3
Ascendo tuum
 
silencer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 659

Yea, I agree....Fuck those guys, if they are "innocent" well then , tough shit you got caught at the wrong place at the wrong time.(Highly unlikely). As long as the intel is good at stops the killings of thousands of women, children and families then I couldn't give a shit, not one little bit.
silencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 02:08 PM   #4
primeau
 
lnvanry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,035
Photos: 12

Its nice to hear the same opinion outside the US
lnvanry is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 02:09 PM   #5
Elite Kiki
Elite Member
 
BigDyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Securityland
Posts: 15,742
Photos: 2

I agree 100,000%.



Quote:
Originally Posted by kbm8795 View Post
Oh, I think Americans understand that the one thing conservatives hate the most is the idea of spending American tax money on Americans. . .in America.


Your tax money is safe. . .in Iraq.
Total ownage.
BigDyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 02:10 PM   #6
primeau
 
lnvanry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,035
Photos: 12

I wouldn't have expected that from you Dyl
lnvanry is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 02:42 PM   #7
The American Dream
Elite Member
 
dougnukem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 1,802
Photos: 6

I have no idea what you're talking about. We are very nice to the prisoners. We treat them the same way as we're treated as prisoners.
dougnukem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 04:13 PM   #8
Pizza the Hut
Super Moderator
 
Mudge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 23,027
Photos: 1

Are we beheading now? I didn't know that.



Kinesiology Vote @ Top 25 Deads Comp Bench
Motivation Bench form MaxCalc Charles Poliquin
When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be. Lao-Tzu
I don't know any sources so don't ask - thanks
Mudge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 04:25 PM   #9
Senior Member
Elite Member
 
Devlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 3,278
Photos: 27

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougnukem
I have no idea what you're talking about. We are very nice to the prisoners. We treat them the same way as we're treated as prisoners.


I agree 100%. We need to do what needs to be done to get the intel. Just reminded them that we could resort to Saddam's methods of interrogation instead of just beatings and embarassing pics.



Devlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 07:58 AM   #10
Uranium powered
 
ATOMSPLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 286

I guess they should have talked. That'll learn them.
ATOMSPLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 08:15 AM   #11
Magical Apelikemenace
Elite Member
 
The Monkey Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Delhi, India
Posts: 13,629
Photos: 34

OOPS -



Have Problems?... Chances are its due to overpopulation

Save The Oceans, Save the Planet, Save Your Family, Save Yourself!
The Monkey Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 08:18 AM   #12
Moderator
Moderator
 
Dale Mabry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 13,835
Photos: 10

If you are a soldier in a war, you should assume you are going to be mistreated, it's not a tea party.



If sense were common, everyone would have it.

4/2007-Current 75th Ranked most popular image 1 spot behind Prince's bulge...
Dale Mabry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 08:23 AM   #13
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,544

There is a time and place for everything, torture has its place but it has to be the right people, the right way and for the right reasons......
The idea that the good guys where white hats and do things the moral and proper way is a joke.....we are all bloddy killers who don't give a f-ck about the rules.
TJ Cline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 08:36 AM   #14
Moderator
Moderator
 
Dale Mabry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 13,835
Photos: 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
The idea that the good guys where white hats
Why they gotta be white...Racist.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
we are all bloddy killers who don't give a f-ck about the rules.
Only Foreman's rules.



If sense were common, everyone would have it.

4/2007-Current 75th Ranked most popular image 1 spot behind Prince's bulge...
Dale Mabry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 08:49 AM   #15
Elite Kiki
Elite Member
 
BigDyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Securityland
Posts: 15,742
Photos: 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
There is a time and place for everything, torture has its place but it has to be the right people, the right way and for the right reasons......
The idea that the good guys where white hats and do things the moral and proper way is a joke.....we are all bloddy killers who don't give a f-ck about the rules.




Quote:
Originally Posted by kbm8795 View Post
Oh, I think Americans understand that the one thing conservatives hate the most is the idea of spending American tax money on Americans. . .in America.


Your tax money is safe. . .in Iraq.
Total ownage.
BigDyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 09:35 AM   #16
Metrosexual
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van, down by the river...
Posts: 21,490
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
There is a time and place for everything, torture has its place but it has to be the right people, the right way and for the right reasons......
The idea that the good guys where white hats and do things the moral and proper way is a joke.....we are all bloddy killers who don't give a f-ck about the rules.
No one follows the "rules" 100 percent, but some follow it better than others.

US soldiers have not:
But on bomb-laden vest and blown themselves up in the middle of innocent civilians.
Kidnapped aid workers and behedded them.


Just to name a couple of things.
DOMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 09:39 AM   #17
Moderator
Moderator
 
Dale Mabry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 13,835
Photos: 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by cfs3
No one follows the "rules" 100 percent, but some follow it better than others.

US soldiers have not:
But on bomb-laden vest and blown themselves up in the middle of innocent civilians.
Kidnapped aid workers and behedded them.


Just to name a couple of things.
It's funny, when an Iraqi runs into a crowded marketplace and blows up 50 people we don't even balk, when a stray US missile kills 2 people it is an outrage.



If sense were common, everyone would have it.

4/2007-Current 75th Ranked most popular image 1 spot behind Prince's bulge...
Dale Mabry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 09:45 AM   #18
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,544

Quote:
Originally Posted by cfs3
No one follows the "rules" 100 percent, but some follow it better than others.

US soldiers have not:
But on bomb-laden vest and blown themselves up in the middle of innocent civilians.
Kidnapped aid workers and behedded them.


Just to name a couple of things.
Terrorism and American troops torturing prisoners are two different things....

Thats like comparing situations when countries have dropped atomic bombs on innocent civilians.....well only one country has done that.
TJ Cline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 10:47 AM   #19
Metrosexual
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van, down by the river...
Posts: 21,490
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
Terrorism and American troops torturing prisoners are two different things....

Thats like comparing situations when countries have dropped atomic bombs on innocent civilians.....well only one country has done that.
Wrong.

The comparison is valid. They are two side of the same conflict.
DOMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 10:49 AM   #20
Metrosexual
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van, down by the river...
Posts: 21,490
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Mabry
It's funny, when an Iraqi runs into a crowded marketplace and blows up 50 people we don't even balk, when a stray US missile kills 2 people it is an outrage.
So?

When it's Iraqi people being killed you see Iraqis in the street crying and such. When it's the American's that get killed you don't hear anything from the Iraqi people.
DOMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 11:04 AM   #21
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,544

Quote:
Originally Posted by cfs3
Wrong.

The comparison is valid. They are two side of the same conflict.
Nope you are grasping at straws again
TJ Cline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 11:31 AM   #22
Metrosexual
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van, down by the river...
Posts: 21,490
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
Nope you are grasping at straws again
Explain to me how I'm "grasping at straws."
DOMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 12:42 PM   #23
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,544

I did a few posts ago.......no reason for me to do it again since you only are interested in your own opinions.
TJ Cline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 12:42 PM   #24
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,291

Let's be clear, the atomic bombs dropped on Japan saved far, far more lives than they destroyed. Both Japanese, and American.

Not to mention, those idiots started it with a sneak attack. (Gee wish you could take that one back huh?)
brogers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 12:44 PM   #25
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,544

No I don't wish that


Killing 100,000+ babys, women and old people and heroic act......get a grip dude!
TJ Cline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 12:54 PM   #26
Metrosexual
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van, down by the river...
Posts: 21,490
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
I did a few posts ago.......no reason for me to do it again since you only are interested in your own opinions.
OK, let's revisit your logic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
Terrorism and American troops torturing prisoners are two different things....
These are two sides of the same conflict. What the terrorists do is done on, mostly, civilians. What the US soldiers do is done on captured combatants. So yes, they are two different things, but not in the way that you think they are.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
Thats like comparing situations when countries have dropped atomic bombs on innocent civilians.....well only one country has done that.
Dropping the nukes was done to stop a long and bloody war. The explosive vest wearing terrorists are doing it to demoralize the Iraqi people to pressure them in getting the US soldiers out of Iraq so that they can turn back into a Muslim Dictatorship.

Comparing the soldier-to-soldier fighting of WW2 that led up to the use of nukes to the terrorist bombings in Iraq shows a lack of understanding.
DOMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 12:55 PM   #27
primeau
 
lnvanry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,035
Photos: 12

I don't think Truman and rest of the politicians realized the gravity of a nuclear explosion over a population....that truth was with the scientific community.