Should we take military action against IRAN?

**Tough Old Man** · 01-13-2006, 04:28 PM

Well should we?

**topolo** · 01-13-2006, 04:30 PM

Yes, immediately

**maniclion** · 01-13-2006, 04:31 PM

Nuke'em.

Just figure I'd say it before some other idiot did.

**The Monkey Man** · 01-13-2006, 04:40 PM

We should pull all troops out of the middle east...
Put them on supply duty...

And Blanket bomb Iraq, Iran, Syria, Pakistan and Afghanastan,
with x-boxes, boom-boxes, music cds, self-install satellite dish kits,
jeans and sports jerseys, and laptops...

Then ignore them for two years...

Done!

(And all that crap will probably cost a quarter of what were spending now,
and maybe we can build some of it in the US)

**DirtyWhiteBoy** · 01-13-2006, 05:44 PM

Turn that desert into a plate of glass for all to see.

**Prince** · 01-13-2006, 05:44 PM

Originally Posted by Tough Old Man

Well should we?

at this point in time why would we?

**topolo** · 01-13-2006, 06:35 PM

Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio

at this point in time why would we?

ummmmmmmm? because they are building nuclear weapons and their president is a hostage taker.

**Tough Old Man** · 01-13-2006, 06:37 PM

Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio

at this point in time why would we?

You just interupted my dinner with a reply that ask a question to a question. Linda get me the rope and find a tall tree. I have a person to hang

**The Monkey Man** · 01-13-2006, 06:40 PM

Originally Posted by Tough Old Man

You just interupted my dinner with a reply that ask a question to a question. Linda get me the rope and find a tall tree. I have a person to hang

None of this changes the fact that Monkey has the best solution!

(love me daddy)

**Prince** · 01-13-2006, 06:42 PM

Originally Posted by topolo

ummmmmmmm? because they are building nuclear weapons and their president is a hostage taker.

oh, well in that case yes we should start another war.

**maniclion** · 01-13-2006, 06:52 PM

Originally Posted by topolo

ummmmmmmm? because they are building nuclear weapons and their president is a hostage taker.

**Ross051288** · 01-13-2006, 06:53 PM

Originally Posted by topolo

ummmmmmmm? because they are building nuclear weapons and their president is a hostage taker.

just like Iraq were?

**Dale Mabry** · 01-13-2006, 06:55 PM

Wait, we need to ask the important questions...How much oil do they have?

**TJ Cline** · 01-13-2006, 06:55 PM

was

**Prince** · 01-13-2006, 06:56 PM

Originally Posted by Dale Mabry

Wait...How much oil do they have?

exactly...oh wait, we are at war with Iraq because we are fighting terrorism and because we care about their people.

**maniclion** · 01-13-2006, 07:00 PM

Originally Posted by Dale Mabry

Wait, we need to ask the important questions...How much oil do they have?

Or better yet how many white protestant males with triple digit incomes live there?

**Ghost_Dog** · 01-13-2006, 07:02 PM

Iran poses a "grave threat..."

This is why conservatives are up in arms...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,181556,00.html

**TheCurse** · 01-13-2006, 07:49 PM

Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio

exactly...oh wait, we are at war with Iraq because we are fighting terrorism and because we care about their people.

of course we are! are you trying to tell me i shouldnt believe the american media? hogwash! the united states went into that war looking to free iraq... wait a minute maybe not, i seem to recall something about wmd's... but saddam became a serious threat ... wait a minute he was no different than he was 10 or 20 years ago.. hmmm im confused, what could be the interest of the US in iraq? oh well, guess ill never know

**Dale Mabry** · 01-13-2006, 07:53 PM

I know, I want my oil for food, I have some hot pockets I'll trade for a tank of regular.

**Tough Old Man** · 01-13-2006, 07:54 PM

I say put all the iranians in a giant microwave oven and set it for 10 minutes. That should take care of the problem

**Big Smoothy** · 01-13-2006, 09:43 PM

The only viable option for the U.S. is surgical strike and the use of "smart" technology. Even with U.S. intelligence (which has been doubted lately) there is the possibility that not all of the locations are identified and therefore can't be targeted.

Any military ground option, is obviously out of the question.

So, my question to you all is:

If the U.S. was so pre-occupied with the "threat" from Iraq, how the did the U.S. completely drop the ball on the Iranian Nuclear progran, which began, long before Ahbinadjad was elected?

Can anyone enlighten me on this?

**topolo** · 01-13-2006, 09:47 PM

Originally Posted by Ross051288

just like Iraq were?

Nice grammar! The difference here is that Iran admits to building a nuclear reactor and even Germany and France are on board with us. Your comparison is as

as your grammar.

**topolo** · 01-13-2006, 09:48 PM

Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio

oh, well in that case yes we should start another war.

No let's just sit back and wait for them to have a nuke so they can give it to Al-Qaeda.

**topolo** · 01-13-2006, 09:48 PM

Originally Posted by maniclion

**Dale Mabry** · 01-13-2006, 10:04 PM

Then why didn't we bomb...

**Ghost_Dog** · 01-13-2006, 10:05 PM

Originally Posted by topolo

No let's just sit back and wait for them to have a nuke so they can give it to Al-Qaeda.

Yes, lets attack every country in the middle east...

**topolo** · 01-13-2006, 10:24 PM

Originally Posted by Ghost_Dog

Yes, lets attack every country in the middle east...

ok, except Israel

**Dale Mabry** · 01-13-2006, 10:33 PM

Why not Israel, you Jewish?

**topolo** · 01-13-2006, 10:36 PM

No, they killed Christ

**Dale Mabry** · 01-13-2006, 10:43 PM

You should check out the gallery, I have your spot reserved.

Thread: Should we take military action against IRAN?

Thread Tools

Display

Should we take military action against IRAN?

Similar Threads

Standing Military vs Seated Military

Iran is next

Favorite action heros & action movies?

Let's go to Iran???

Military Rules for the Non-Military Personnel

Posting Permissions