Do you play chess?

**kicka19** · 02-27-2006, 09:13 PM

any of you crackas play chess get at me, i play on yahoo chess and chalenge anyone here to a duel if they got the balls, let me know the time and ill we can arange something

**Little Wing** · 02-27-2006, 09:38 PM

i do but i'm not very good at it .... yet. Vanity is very good at n collects chess sets. i want this one.

**TJ Cline** · 02-27-2006, 09:39 PM

I did years ago, got my ass kicked by a 12 year old so that was that.

**gococksDJS** · 02-27-2006, 09:40 PM

Yeah, I play. They call me "Deep Blue"

**topolo** · 02-27-2006, 09:45 PM

I like to jack off

**kicka19** · 02-27-2006, 09:45 PM

wtf does deep blue mean?

**min0 lee** · 02-27-2006, 09:47 PM

Yes.

**gococksDJS** · 02-27-2006, 09:47 PM

Originally Posted by kicka19

wtf does deep blue mean?

Deep Blue is the computer that made Gary Kasparov bend over and take an anal pounding via. knight to E3.....checkmate.

**kicka19** · 02-27-2006, 09:47 PM

Originally Posted by min0 lee

Yes.

play me mino

**kicka19** · 02-27-2006, 09:48 PM

Originally Posted by gococksDJS

Deep Blue is the computer that made Gary Kasparov bend over and take an anal pounding via. knight to E3.....checkmate.

i heard bout that computer, i didnt know the name

**gococksDJS** · 02-27-2006, 09:50 PM

Originally Posted by kicka19

play me mino

Deep Blue challenges you, and mankind is at stake, because Deep Blue also runs Cyberdine Corp. So unless you're John Conner, you're fucked.

**lnvanry** · 02-27-2006, 09:52 PM

I play competively..placed second place in the Vegas US Open(U1200)...26th in the nation for National Scholastic when I was in high school...

Deep Blue was a super computer (128 parallel processors...not just any computer) that beat the champion once;however, the Russian champ beat deep blue at their first tournament...so its not an ass kicking.

On a side note the IBM techies programed the fucking thing to play Garry...not to play chess. It was designed off Garry's thousands of games.

Man is still better at the game and always will be IMO

**Super Hulk** · 02-27-2006, 10:03 PM

Originally Posted by gococksDJS

Yeah, I play. They call me "Deep Throght"

they call me "Big Purple....... er ...Dick"

**Super Hulk** · 02-27-2006, 10:05 PM

why would i play a game that takes a whole lotta effort to play well...
read books for hours and hours.?........fuck it

**gococksDJS** · 02-27-2006, 10:15 PM

Originally Posted by Super Hulk

why would i play a game that takes a whole lotta effort to play well...
read books for hours and hours.?........fuck it

You know, if you actually read a book or two, you might have known that it's THROAT, not "THROUGHT". They would call me "Deep Throat" not "Deep Throght"

**gococksDJS** · 02-27-2006, 10:17 PM

Originally Posted by lnvanry

I play competively..placed second place in the Vegas US Open(U1200)...26th in the nation for National Scholastic when I was in high school...

That's cute, but I beat CHESSMASTER 3000. I think that speaks for itself.

**KentDog** · 02-28-2006, 01:04 AM

I heard Deep Blue's chess program was released publically. Do you know anything about this gococks?

**Super Hulk** · 02-28-2006, 02:19 AM

Originally Posted by gococksDJS

You know, if you actually read a book or two, you might have known that it's THROAT, not "THROUGHT". They would call me "Deep Throat" not "Deep Throght"

put your glases on 4 eyes i spelt it "throght", you left an "O" ouwtt

**Doublebase** · 02-28-2006, 06:37 AM

yes

**nsimmons** · 02-28-2006, 07:10 AM

Originally Posted by lnvanry

Man is still better at the game and always will be IMO

Always? Thats a loaded statement. Computers took 60+ years to evolve to the point of beating a human, who had a 2 million year head start. Wait a decade or 2, if that.

**cappo5150** · 02-28-2006, 11:43 AM

I never learned how. Me not a smart feller.

**gococksDJS** · 02-28-2006, 04:59 PM

Originally Posted by nsimmons

Always? Thats a loaded statement. Computers took 60+ years to evolve to the point of beating a human, who had a 2 million year head start. Wait a decade or 2, if that.

Read about "Technological Singularity", it's interesting as shit. It basically deals with the fact that one day, man will no longer be the most intelligent inhabitants of earth, computers will, either by independent forms of AI and/or "posthumans". If this ever happened it would make all models of change based on the past trends of human behavior (stock trends etc) completely useless. At a singluarity point, all governing laws based out of the past break down and have absolutely no relevance in the present frame, kind of like the laws of physics at a gravitational singluarity(black holes).

**min0 lee** · 02-28-2006, 05:20 PM

Let's hear what your favorite piece is? Mine would happen to be the Knight coupled with a Bishop.

**gococksDJS** · 02-28-2006, 05:47 PM

Originally Posted by nsimmons

Always? Thats a loaded statement. Computers took 60+ years to evolve to the point of beating a human, who had a 2 million year head start. Wait a decade or 2, if that.

haha, here's an example right here. Seems like computers are better at coaching NFL football than humans.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11607114/from/RS.2/

**lnvanry** · 02-28-2006, 11:21 PM

Originally Posted by nsimmons

Always? Thats a loaded statement. Computers took 60+ years to evolve to the point of beating a human, who had a 2 million year head start. Wait a decade or 2, if that.

OK...thes best human chess player, Kasperov, will always be better than the best computer...maybe after he gets older and starts to lose his creativity and mental wits computers might be on top.

**gococksDJS** · 02-28-2006, 11:41 PM

Originally Posted by lnvanry

OK...thes best human chess player, Kasperov, will always be better than the best computer...maybe after he gets older and starts to lose his creativity and mental wits computers might be on top.

Well the way this is worded, if he lost, it could just be blamed on him losing his creativity. To even compare the two is pointless because a computer doesn't learn chess through practice, it's programmed with basically millions of scenarios, strategies and possibilities and, through logic, can make moves based on statistical probabilities. Plus the computer would never get mentally tired.

**min0 lee** · 03-01-2006, 06:04 AM

I learned to play better not using the Queen, once you learn how to use your other pieces and not really on the deadly Queen your going to beat people.

I've played with people who quit after they lost the Queen.

**BigDyl** · 03-01-2006, 07:17 AM

Originally Posted by min0 lee

I learned to play better not using the Queen, once you learn how to use your other pieces and not really on the deadly Queen your going to beat people.

I've played with people who quit after they lost the Queen.

You're a queen.

**Tough Old Man** · 03-01-2006, 08:11 AM

Originally Posted by min0 lee

I've played with people who quit after they lost the Queen.

Really. I've played with people who quit after they lost the King

**lnvanry** · 03-01-2006, 01:39 PM

Originally Posted by gococksDJS

Well the way this is worded, if he lost, it could just be blamed on him losing his creativity. To even compare the two is pointless because a computer doesn't learn chess through practice, it's programmed with basically millions of scenarios, strategies and possibilities and, through logic, can make moves based on statistical probabilities. Plus the computer would never get mentally tired.

Actually Deep Blue does learn....that's what made it so special. Clearly its programmed with numerous senarios, but it was designed and programmed with the intent to play Garry

Thread: Do you play chess?

Thread Tools

Display

Do you play chess?

Similar Threads

UFC Play-by-Play

Chess Players Using Anabolic Steroids

MP's Rose Bowl play-by-play

Chess programs for children.

Maximum Strength Contact = Sore Chess

Posting Permissions