Thread: Are you a homo-phobic?

Originally Posted by KEFE

Are you a homo? I am

Originally Posted by KEFE

Are you a homo phobic?I am

make that 2!

Originally Posted by KEFE

Are you a homo phobic?I am

No, I think you're an alright kid.

Originally Posted by LexusGS

make that 2!

You and KEFE have a hard time looking in the mirror huh?

Am I homophonic? No I sound different.

Originally Posted by KEFE

Are you a homo phobic?I am

Originally Posted by LexusGS

That makes us that 2 closet homos

True Story

Originally Posted by KEFE

Are you a homo phobic?I am

Only around Tough Old Man -

Originally Posted by maniclion

You and KEFE have a hard time looking in the mirror huh?

Wow that was gay. I should kick your ass jus for sayin that.

Cept you won't, homo.

Originally Posted by JordanMang

Cept you won't, homo.

shut your ass up fatass. Ma grandma can bench more then you and she's 95lb.

It depends on the definition of homophobic. Many people will call anyone who doesn't support gay marriage and gay adoption a homophobe. The literal definition is a fear of homosexuals, yet I doubt even the most outspoken anti-homosexual would admit to being literally afraid.

Originally Posted by LexusGS

shut your ass up fatass. Ma grandma can bench more then you and she's 95lb.

Like how you're talking shit, but I bench more then you do - and more then likely I'd destroy you. Pretty immature.

ROFL

Jordanmang is 16 and squats like 500 LB's.... riiiiiiggghht.

Originally Posted by JordanMang

Like how you're talking shit, but I bench more then you do - and more then likely I'd destroy you. Pretty immature.

Too bad strength doesn't mean shit against someone who knows how to fight.

1. I do know how to fight. I've actually studied MMA quite a bit since I was pretty young. I've ameature boxed, and I've wrestled.

2. I squat 420 ( if you'd actually LOOK at my stats ) and that's not really unbelievable since I've seen guys my age squat 500, and I have friends who are 5'7-5'9 140-150 who squat 450+ so it's not unbelieveable at all.

Originally Posted by JordanMang

1. I do know how to fight. I've actually studied MMA quite a bit since I was pretty young. I've ameature boxed, and I've wrestled.

2. I squat 420 ( if you'd actually LOOK at my stats ) and that's not really unbelievable since I've seen guys my age squat 500, and I have friends who are 5'7-5'9 140-150 who squat 450+ so it's not unbelieveable at all.

Riiiiight...

You're pretty dim. Maybe you should look into school power-lifting meets. I mean I'm talking without any gear here. My best friend went to regionals
not even state when he squatted 490 in the 140 class ( I think that's it ). Stop being so ignorant and so some research.

Originally Posted by JordanMang

1. I do know how to fight. I've watched back-to-back episodes of 'Walker Texas Ranger' and I've studied the kung Fu moves in the Matrix a hundred times...

Whoa.............................. I bet even Jamaican Rude Boy might even tremble at that

Originally Posted by LexusGS

shut your ass up fatass. Ma grandma can bench more then you and she's 95lb.

Myrmidons! My brothers of the sword! I would rather fight beside you than any army of thousands! Let no man forget how menacing we are, we are lions! Do you know what's waiting beyond that beach? Immortality! Take it! It's yours!

Originally Posted by clemson357

It depends on the definition of homophobic. Many people will call anyone who doesn't support gay marriage and gay adoption a homophobe. The literal definition is a fear of homosexuals, yet I doubt even the most outspoken anti-homosexual would admit to being literally afraid.

Actually, the definition means fear, an aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuals. (Merriam Webster). Or the Cambridge Dictionary calls homophobia as "fear or dislike" of homosexuals.

Well now, I thought the 'phobes were ONLY afraid of gay marriage and they needed that completely banned by constitutional amendment...and they said it wasn't discrimination but just protecting marriage and that gays have all the same OTHER rights. So now they aren't supposed to adopt children too? Maybe they shouldn't be allowed to live down the street either - I mean, isn't that a bad example to set for the children of proper heterosexuals who are gonna see people living in so much sin that they ain't allowed to adopt any children? How can you possibly want "those" people living in the neighborhood when you are trying to raise your kids NOT to be gay? And maybe we better get them out of the schools too - how can we have them teaching vulnerable proper christian children who could be exposed to discovering their teacher can't get married? Are they gonna be allowed to father or mother children naturally, through agreement of insemination, or is that too dangerous for the homophobes who really aren't "afraid" of homosexuals? Do ya think they'll even be allowed to. . .well, you know, drop by a homosexual bar for a beer with their buds, or is that gonna be too scary for the homophobes who really aren't afraid of the homosexuals - they just need the gays to make one or two or three or four or five or six sacrifices of their human rights - ya know, just to make the "I'm-not-a-homophobe" people feel better.

Actually, I kinda like the joke-bill introduced in the Ohio Legislature that would prohibit Republicans from adopting children. Makes perfect sense to me.

Originally Posted by BigDyl

Too bad strength doesn't mean shit against someone who knows how to fight.

Strength means a lot, but it just isn't as important as being a skilling fighter.
Otherwise, there would be at least one skinny little punk MMA fighter.

Originally Posted by kbm8795

Actually, the definition means fear, an aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuals. (Merriam Webster). Or the Cambridge Dictionary calls homophobia as "fear or dislike" of homosexuals.

Well now, I thought the 'phobes were ONLY afraid of gay marriage and they needed that completely banned by constitutional amendment...and they said it wasn't discrimination but just protecting marriage and that gays have all the same OTHER rights. So now they aren't supposed to adopt children too? Maybe they shouldn't be allowed to live down the street either - I mean, isn't that a bad example to set for the children of proper heterosexuals who are gonna see people living in so much sin that they ain't allowed to adopt any children? How can you possibly want "those" people living in the neighborhood when you are trying to raise your kids NOT to be gay? And maybe we better get them out of the schools too - how can we have them teaching vulnerable proper christian children who could be exposed to discovering their teacher can't get married? Are they gonna be allowed to father or mother children naturally, through agreement of insemination, or is that too dangerous for the homophobes who really aren't "afraid" of homosexuals? Do ya think they'll even be allowed to. . .well, you know, drop by a homosexual bar for a beer with their buds, or is that gonna be too scary for the homophobes who really aren't afraid of the homosexuals - they just need the gays to make one or two or three or four or five or six sacrifices of their human rights - ya know, just to make the "I'm-not-a-homophobe" people feel better.

Dude, I am sorry we got off on the wrong foot, and I would like to say you have your shit together. Your post have been very interesting reading lately, and even if I do nto agree with you on some things, I do respect your stance.

Originally Posted by KelJu

Strength means a lot, but it just isn't as important as being a skilling fighter.
Otherwise, there would be at least one skinny little punk MMA fighter.

What is a skilling fighter?

Kefe - what has happened to you to make you so anti-gay? Usually, such large anti-xxx feelings are the result of deep insecurities.

Originally Posted by KelJu

Strength means a lot, but it just isn't as important as being a skilling fighter.
Otherwise, there would be at least one skinny little punk MMA fighter.

Define skinny. None of the top MMA fighters look like body builders, they just have some lean body mass. This doesn't mean they are "strong."

The only type of strength that makes a big difference is grip strength. Beyond that, you don't need to bench 300 LB's to armbar someone or KO them.

Originally Posted by JordanMang

2. I have friends who are 5'7-5'9 140-150 who squat 450+ so it's not unbelieveable at all.