What your future wife will be thinking a few years after you have children.
This is the discussion copied from Internet discussion forum:
Woman 1
My second husband and I were pregnant and happy. He has 3 children from a prior marriage, and all seemed peaceful. His ex wife, upon learning he was having a child with me engaged an attorney and upped the child support to the point where half of his income after taxes is being paid to her. Now, instead of being able to stay home with my new daughter, I will have to go to work to support her. And if it ever goes bad in my marriage, I will receive very little support. Think hard before marrying a man with children and a living ex wife.
Woman 2
I believe you will be entitled to your full share if you divorce. He will not have much of a life left though. Woman 3
Full share? Not in Texas, it's a non alimony state.
Woman 1
You raise a good point; by being forced to work, I will have income which will count against me for alimony. I am in CA, thankfully.
Woman 2
If you are feeling distant from him (emotional neglect) or he is lashing out at you (emotional rape) - do not start going to work. You need to act now to protect whatever benefits you are entitled to later. ( sounds like my ex)
Woman 1
He has been very distant and stressed, and I do feel that we are drifting apart. Plus, I do not feel I should have to work due to his past mistakes.
Woman 2
I recommend if possible you make it to the 7-10 year mark before divorcing him - that will yield maximum benefits. And don't forget, when you do drop the bomb - get a lawyer first and he has to cover the costs.
Woman 1
I did not know this. Thanks for the advice! Well, I have the child, and I do feel quite neglected. I think maybe now is the time to cash out. Question: he has an inheritance - can I still get a piece of it after the marriage ends?
Woman 2
Yes! You get a piece out of every dollar that he gets for the next eighteen years - and by then laws will have been changed to possibly raise it to beyond 18. Woman 3
Don't go to work. The Ex will take you back for an increase based on more household income from your job. Find a job under the table... The court's standard bullshit line on this is "don't have more kids if you can't support the ones you already have..."
Woman 1
This is what I am thinking. Maybe just cash out now, sell the house at some point, and let him pay until the inheritance hits. In the meantime, I can remarry, after a little "playtime". I do feel like he promised me happiness and now it is all just sadness and I have to work.
What are good wifey skills?
Cooking, cleaning, mothering, nurturing, wants kids, loves kids, loyal, trustworthy.
What is important is that the wife does not have a real negative attitude towards doing those things. Any trace of snobbery at doing traditional female tasks is a bad sign of a princess.
Marrige is a case where both partners need to give up something to get somthing different and greater in return. If anyone is selfish about the realtionship then it won't work.
And a marrige except for a few cases needs someone to be a provider, and someone to be a domestic.
Oh, I think Americans understand that the one thing conservatives hate the most is the idea of spending American tax money on Americans. . .in America.
I think my wife thought wow I shouldve not gotten drunk that Friday night we got together. Then after we got married she thought like a week after....well I'm screwed for sure now, all this dumb basturd wants to do is hit the gym......well then again maybe Anthony could come over about that time.....hmmmm
This is probably why so many women are killed by their ex husbands.
So many cries of inequality stem from one of group
of people doing little or nothing and then bitching
about another group that actually does something
to improve their lives.
What can we glean from this? Forman not only hates white men and mexicans, he hates women and the institution of marriage as well.
Seriously, two threads directed at bashing women? In your view, you can't trust your wife that her children are actually yours, and you shouldn't get married to begin with because they will just go after your money.
What can we glean from this? Forman not only hates white men and mexicans, he hates women and the institution of marriage as well.
Seriously, two threads directed at bashing women? In your view, you can't trust your wife that her children are actually yours, and you shouldn't get married to begin with because they will just go after your money.
I really like Chris Rock's piece about OJ and his ex-wife.
"I'm not saying that I agree, I'm just saying that I understand."
So many cries of inequality stem from one of group
of people doing little or nothing and then bitching
about another group that actually does something
to improve their lives.
I don't really agree with the 50% alimony bullshit. If you think about it, a marriage is nothing more than a mutual agreement. Put aside all the mushy crap, and generally you will have an agreement that the person with the better job will keep going to work and provide for the family, and the other person will stay at home and manage the house and take care of the family. So, if that agreement ends, why is it fair to make one person continue their obligation and not the other? In other words, if I have to keep paying her bills she should have to keep cooking my diner.
DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.