Thread: Should the US attack North Korea?

Because we attacked Iraq when they posed "a grave and growing threat..."


I mean, they fired a Topolodong missle. Something only Topolo has accomplished so far.

Delete this polless thread...

No.

The U.S. can't anyway.

1 million + Sout Koreans will be dead, and RoK will have to pay.

U.S. is basically broke, also.

Won't happen.

Diplomatic attempts will happen. Will they work? Doub it.

As for North Korea: I don't care. Why should we?

Originally Posted by Mr_Snafu

No.

The U.S. can't anyway.

1 million + Sout Koreans will be dead, and RoK will have to pay.

U.S. is basically broke, also.

Won't happen.

Diplomatic attempts will happen. Will they work? Doub it.

As for North Korea: I don't care. Why should we?

Should the US attack North Korea?

Yes, we need to spread peace with our best and biggest commodity....war.

No.

The U.S. can't anyway.

1 million + Sout Koreans will be dead, and RoK will have to pay.

U.S. is basically broke, also.

Won't happen.

Diplomatic attempts will happen. Will they work? Doub it.

As for North Korea: I don't care. Why should we?

World Wars bring 1950's good family living isn't that what we all want the American Dream of every man having a job, a housewife and 2.3 kids to come home to waiting in their white picket fenced yard.

And after a war like this the men would literally be having 2.3 kids from the chemical and radioactive poisoning of their reproductive systems.

Where's the "Let them starve to death." option?

Originally Posted by DOMS

Where's the "Let them starve to death." option?

That would be fine, but the only ones starving are the civilians, their army (million man army) is being fed very well. And last I checked those are the ones that cause a threat.

Yes, we need to spread peace with our best and biggest commodity....war.

Originally Posted by Double D

That would be fine, but the only ones starving are the civilians, their army (million man army) is being fed very well. And last I checked those are the ones that cause a threat.

Once again DOMS is shown to be a fool

Originally Posted by Double D

That would be fine, but the only ones starving are the civilians, their army (million man army) is being fed very well. And last I checked those are the ones that cause a threat.

Then either the NK people fix their own problems or the work force that produces what little food NK has dies. Problem solved.

Originally Posted by DOMS

Where's the "Let them starve to death." option?

That's the 3rd option.

Originally Posted by DOMS

Then either the NK people fix their own problems or the work force that produces what little food NK has dies. Problem solved.

Fair enough, but the NK dictator does what it takes to produce what little food they have over there and they will keep producing other wise they will die off against their own will. But if they do start dying off they will have to use some of that money they use on their military for food. And the best part is we will sell it to them........now isn't that some shit!

Originally Posted by Double D

Fair enough, but the NK dictator does what it takes to produce what little food they have over there and they will keep producing other wise they will die off against their own will. But if they do start dying off they will have to use some of that money they use on their military for food. And the best part is we will sell it to them........now isn't that some shit!

They don't have the money to buy anything. The can produce weapons because they do a little mining and their labor (for the government anyway) is essentially free.

Besides, they can buy cheaper food for other countries.

BTW, you do know where they get their money from right now, don't you?

The US gives aid to damn near everyone so.........um, yep.

Originally Posted by Double D

The US gives aid to damn near everyone so.........um, yep.

Ture.

I think the US should just stop all aid (at least for a few years) and cut deficit spending.

Thats true to an extent. But what people don't realize is all the things that we get from other countries for our aid. Yes alot of it is material things, but America is a material world. America is hated by many people and it would be hard to simply stop aid whenever so many countries depend on it. As far as N Korea goes, you know as well I do that NK isnt doing the right things with the aid that we give them.

Originally Posted by Double D

Thats true to an extent. But what people don't realize is all the things that we get from other countries for our aid. Yes alot of it is material things, but America is a material world. America is hated by many people and it would be hard to simply stop aid whenever so many countries depend on it. As far as N Korea goes, you know as well I do that NK isnt doing the right things with the aid that we give them.

We only give so that we can take

Originally Posted by ForemanRules

We only give so that we can take

That was my point brother.......

Originally Posted by Double D

That was my point brother.......

I think most awake people know this...so about 10% of the American population.

Originally Posted by ForemanRules

I think most awake people know this...so about 10% of the American population.

Because the rest of the world is completely philanthropic and full of love.

That is very true.........I majored in history in college a few years back and we had a huge discussion in class over this exact thing. Half of the class wanted to get rid of aid, but then they realized it wasnt possible because of all the problems it causes.

That is the problem with America though, they only see what they want to see. And the media only covers the things they want to cover. If the media covered half the shit that went on within the goverment it would probably start a civil war.

Originally Posted by DOMS

Because the rest of the world is completely philanthropic and full of love.

Please show where I said that Einstein.

Originally Posted by ForemanRules

Please show where I said that Einstein.

You stated the US attaches string to it money, my post was simply, "Welcome to how the world works."

So whats the decision do we attack or not? Or do we wait to get a real president in there to make a rational decision.

Originally Posted by DOMS

You stated the US attaches string to it money, my post was simply, "Welcome to how the world works."

Your post was drunk on self-righteous arrogance.....big surprise.

Originally Posted by Double D

So whats the decision do we attack or not? Or do we wait to get a real president in there to make a rational decision.

Like I said: don't attack, just stop aid to NK; Not to everyone, just NK.