Thread: Mel Gibson arrested

His BA was .12 yet he hasn't been charged yet???? What are they waiting for, him to sober up so they can take it again just to be sure???? Jesus fucking christ the man drank too much communion charge him and let him go on to profitsize I mean prophesize.

#27!

Originally Posted by MyK

#27!

Jesus cares.

Sucks for him.

Originally Posted by maniclion

His BA was .12 yet he hasn't been charged yet???? What are they waiting for, him to sober up so they can take it again just to be sure???? Jesus fucking christ the man drank too much communion charge him and let him go on to profitsize I mean prophesize.

celebrity millionaires are above the law.

Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio

celebrity millionaires are above the law.

Isn't he a billionaire?

Big deal he got drunk and drove. Who here hasnt done that more than once???

I heart Mel gibson, he's my favorite actor

Originally Posted by myCATpowerlifts

Big deal he got drunk and drove. Who here hasnt done that more than once???

I heart Mel gibson, he's my favorite actor

I never have and never will.....pluss I dont preach about Jesus and all that BS then engage in crime....Mel Gibson is a tool.

Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio

celebrity millionaires are above the law.

He will be charged.
My wife was a District Attorney so I learned how the law works, or sometimes does not work.

1) The police arrest the person and gather the evidence on why
they think a crime has been committed.
2) This evidence then goes to the DA's office and they decide if
there is enough evidence (that they can get into the courtroom)
that will show that the person has committed the crime
"beyond a reasonable doubt". (some evidence is excluded and
not admissable into court for reasons like No Miranda warning,
a co-erced confession, he said she said case, etcetera)
3) If they think they can get the evidence into court and it supports
the crime, they will charge the person and issue the warrant for
their arrest.
4) Once issued, most people (about 97%) plead guilty to some type
of crime, maybe even a lesser crime so it does not have to go to court.
The balance of the cases go to court.

If all cases went to court, the system would come to a screeching halt.
Not enough judges or courts to prosecute them all.

I used to think all of the bad guys went to jail. WRONG
It was really sad to see how many crooks, rapists, murderers,
child molesters went free. It made your stomach want to turn.

It is really hard to prove a crime. Just look a OJ Simpson.

Originally Posted by milliman

It is really hard to prove a crime.

And god bless that fact.

Originally Posted by ForemanRules

I never have and never will.....pluss I dont preach about Jesus and all that BS then engage in crime....Mel Gibson is a tool.

He who has no sin cast the first stone.

Just because he encourages us to do the right thing and then
screws up, does not make him a bad guy. We all screw up.
It is just some of us do not care if we do or not.
We have no standard by which to measure right and wrong, just
what you feel like this week or next. The Bible gives you
a standard that does not change.

He screwed up just like all of us. His was drinking, what is your weakness ? Lying, stealing, adultery . . .

Lying does not have to be a big whopper.
It can be a little white lie too. But a lie is a lie.

Who hasn't called in sick and called it a mental health day ?
Or called in sick with just a runny nose or slight cough since you
haven't used up all of your sick days.
That is really stealing from your employer.

Who hasn't taken stuff from your employer.
office supplies, pens, pencils, stamps or what not.
We justify it by saying "its only little stuff".

We all need encouragement to do the right thing.
But it shows us that we are all human when you see
the encourager stumble.

Originally Posted by ForemanRules

I never have and never will.....pluss I dont preach about Jesus and all that BS then engage in crime....Mel Gibson is a tool.

I can verify this. Foreman drinks and walks home.....

Did anyone read about his anti-Jewish tirade? And all his swearing and threats?

Expect more soon....

I believe Foreman full of shit on the drinking and driving, but I agree with him on the Gibson being a tool rant.
Anybody but Gibson, Kennedy, or any other politician / celebrity would have been arrested and charged. These tools get off, and it is bullshit.
Gibson is also a perfect example of these self righteous Christians that preach this bullshit, yet can't live up to their own standards.

Originally Posted by Tough Old Man

I can verify this. Foreman drinks and walks home.....

Originally Posted by KelJu

I believe Foreman full of shit on the drinking and driving, but I agree with him on the Gibson being a tool rant.
Anybody but Gibson, Kennedy, or any other politician / celebrity would have been arrested and charged. These tools get off, and it is bullshit.
Gibson is also a perfect example of these self righteous Christians that preach this bullshit, yet can't live up to their own standards.

#10

#15

Originally Posted by ForemanRules

Jesus cares.

I figured that's why you posted this this...

Btw, alcoholism is not a freakin disease... It's an addiction! People are so #23.

Originally Posted by SuperFlex

I figured that's why you posted this this...

Btw, alcoholism is not a freakin disease... It's an addiction! People are so #23.

He is a tool

Originally Posted by milliman

He will be charged.


1) The police arrest the person and gather the evidence on why
they think a crime has been committed.
2) This evidence then goes to the DA's office and they decide if
there is enough evidence (that they can get into the courtroom)
that will show that the person has committed the crime
"beyond a reasonable doubt". (some evidence is excluded and
not admissable into court for reasons like No Miranda warning,
a co-erced confession, he said she said case, etcetera)
3) If they think they can get the evidence into court and it supports
the crime, they will charge the person and issue the warrant for
their arrest.

FYI... if the officer witnessed the crime, its the officer's discretion wether to charge or not. He dosen't need a warrant. And, if he feels he needs the advise of the prosecutor, he can just call one. DUIs are usually not handled that way... unless it's an accident where the drunk has a head or life threatening injury. In that case a warrant is done for the blood, and the subject will be arrested later. Otherwise, the offender would be charged based on the results intoxalizer, urine, or blood test. The offender can chose the method of testing, your best bet is the intoxalizer (your attorney can attack the service records and accuracy of the machine). Refuse the test and its an automatic 1 year suspension of license, violation of implied consent. The officer will charge subject based on his probable cause for a motor vehicle stop, probable cause for a field sobriety test, and the results of the test. Something else to keep in mind, if you test under the legal limit, chances are you will still be charged, but with the lesser Driving While Impared. And if the, officer writes a good report, a DUI or DWI is usually an easy conviction.

Originally Posted by ForemanRules

He is a tool

Most hollywood people are...

Originally Posted by ForemanRules

I never have and never will.....pluss I dont preach about Jesus and all that BS then engage in crime....Mel Gibson is a tool.

He broke man's law, not God's law son.

Originally Posted by myCATpowerlifts

He broke man's law, not God's law son.

Thou shall not kill.......#19

Originally Posted by milliman

He will be charged.
My wife was a District Attorney so I learned how the law works, or sometimes does not work.

1) The police arrest the person and gather the evidence on why
they think a crime has been committed.
2) This evidence then goes to the DA's office and they decide if
there is enough evidence (that they can get into the courtroom)
that will show that the person has committed the crime
"beyond a reasonable doubt". (some evidence is excluded and
not admissable into court for reasons like No Miranda warning,
a co-erced confession, he said she said case, etcetera)
3) If they think they can get the evidence into court and it supports
the crime, they will charge the person and issue the warrant for
their arrest.
4) Once issued, most people (about 97%) plead guilty to some type
of crime, maybe even a lesser crime so it does not have to go to court.
The balance of the cases go to court.

If all cases went to court, the system would come to a screeching halt.
Not enough judges or courts to prosecute them all.

I used to think all of the bad guys went to jail. WRONG
It was really sad to see how many crooks, rapists, murderers,
child molesters went free. It made your stomach want to turn.

It is really hard to prove a crime. Just look a OJ Simpson.

Welcome back!!

Originally Posted by Tough Old Man

I can verify this. Foreman drinks and walks home.....

You do mean crawls home don't you?

Originally Posted by min0 lee

You do mean crawls home don't you?

This is a oxymoron. I don't think Foreman would be willing to spend the amount of money it would take for him to be intoxicated enough to crawl home. Of course if we're talking about him being in Mexico ( where I assume alcohol is less expensive ) then I don't think he'd be crawling simply because he's in Mexico.

Originally Posted by JordanMang

This is a oxymoron. I don't think Foreman would be willing to spend the amount of money it would take for him to be intoxicated enough to crawl home. Of course if we're talking about him being in Mexico ( where I assume alcohol is less expensive ) then I don't think he'd be crawling simply because he's in Mexico.

#2!

Originally Posted by JordanMang

This is a oxymoron. I don't think Foreman would be willing to spend the amount of money it would take for him to be intoxicated enough to crawl home. Of course if we're talking about him being in Mexico ( where I assume alcohol is less expensive ) then I don't think he'd be crawling simply because he's in Mexico.

Hmm....OK.