IronMagLabs Osta Rx


What do you think should be the first order of business for the new Congress?

View Poll Results: Have Your Say

Voters
16. You may not vote on this poll
  • Environment

    1 6.25%
  • Immigration

    5 31.25%
  • Iraq

    5 31.25%
  • Social Security

    0 0%
  • Trade

    1 6.25%
  • Other

    4 25.00%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 43
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    What do you think should be the first order of business for the new Congress?

    Have your say

  2. #2
    End of the world
    ELITE MEMBER

    Triple Threat's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Lost
    Posts
    11,316
    Rep Points
    63547645


    Tough call between Iraq and Immigration. I finally went with Iraq.

  3. #3
    Registered User

    goandykid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,376
    Rep Points
    3146535

    Illegal Immigration isn't gonna change till Mexico and South America change.

    People who keep saying "we need to toughen up on immigration, we need to have immigration laws stricter" need a reality check.

    There are countless hole's in our border. Unless we put a watch tower around every 15 feet of our border, including the oceans, manned by 2-3 people apiece, and invent some kind of illegal immigrant radar that can find them anywhere, including trunks, we're not going to stop illegal immigration.

    We need to fix Mexico so that they DON'T WANT to leave.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Quote Originally Posted by goandykid View Post
    Illegal Immigration isn't gonna change till Mexico and South America change.

    People who keep saying "we need to toughen up on immigration, we need to have immigration laws stricter" need a reality check.

    There are countless hole's in our border. Unless we put a watch tower around every 15 feet of our border, including the oceans, manned by 2-3 people apiece, and invent some kind of illegal immigrant radar that can find them anywhere, including trunks, we're not going to stop illegal immigration.

    We need to fix Mexico so that they DON'T WANT to leave.
    Is it just Mexicans, what about the Asian, the Africans and the Russians.

  5. #5
    Registered User

    goandykid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,376
    Rep Points
    3146535

    I said South America as well, and that's where the majority of the problem lies. There will always be illegal immigrants, but the vast majority could be taken care of if Mexico and South America fixed themselves up.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Quote Originally Posted by goandykid View Post
    I said South America as well, and that's where the majority of the problem lies. There will always be illegal immigrants, but the vast majority could be taken care of if Mexico and South America fixed themselves up.
    Come to NYC and you'll see different.

    The South Americans are coming over here because we hire them for day laborers.

    I used to wonder why there were so many mexicans and Salvadriens in LOng Island......the rich Americans hired them and they set up shop. Now they multiplied and they can't get rid of them.

    I assume they took the good ones but the bad followed.

  7. #7
    Registered User

    goandykid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,376
    Rep Points
    3146535

    Regardless, statistically the majority of illegal immigrants are of hispanic descent.

    That may be a bold statement since any estimate would be a guess since you can't track them, but I think it's a given. Especially if you come down here below the Mason-Dixon line.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Quote Originally Posted by goandykid View Post
    Regardless, statistically the majority of illegal immigrants are of hispanic descent.

    That may be a bold statement since any estimate would be a guess since you can't track them, but I think it's a given. Especially if you come down here below the Mason-Dixon line.
    I have been to Washington and it doesn't compare to the illegals here in NYC.

    You have to come over here and see what I am talking about.

  9. #9
    Registered User

    goandykid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,376
    Rep Points
    3146535

    Washington is a far cry from the South South. I'll pick you up around 4

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Quote Originally Posted by goandykid View Post
    Washington is a far cry from the South South. I'll pick you up around 4


    True.
    You can walk for blocks and blocks and barely see an American on the street, in certain neighborhoods of course.

  11. #11
    Registered User

    goandykid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,376
    Rep Points
    3146535

    No I still don't think it's that bad. My dad's house used to be on the east side, close to the border between southeast and Northeast, 8th and H specifically. Not a great area, but nearly everyone I met was an American.

    Well maybe not everyone, but most.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Quote Originally Posted by goandykid View Post
    No I still don't think it's that bad. My dad's house used to be on the east side, close to the border between southeast and Northeast, 8th and H specifically. Not a great area, but nearly everyone I met was an American.

    Well maybe not everyone, but most.
    In New York City?

    Can I get a link on some immagration numbers, I can't find a direct source.

  13. #13
    Registered User

    goandykid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,376
    Rep Points
    3146535

    Quote Originally Posted by min0 lee View Post
    In New York City?

    Can I get a link on some immagration numbers, I can't find a direct source.
    Oh I thought you were talking about Washington still.

    Illegal Immigration numbers? I'll check too, like I said any estimate would eb a guess.

  14. #14
    Registered User

    goandykid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,376
    Rep Points
    3146535

    Here's an interesting stat between South and North

    Percentage change in Foreign Born Population 1990 to 2000

    North Carolina 273.7% South Carolina 132.1% Mississippi 95.8% Wisconsin 59.4% Vermont 32.5%
    Georgia 233.4% Minnesota 130.4% Washington 90.7% New Jersey 52.7% Connecticut 32.4%
    Nevada 202.0% Idaho 121.7% Texas 90.2% Alaska 49.8% New Hampshire 31.5%
    Arkansas 196.3% Kansas 114.4% New Mexico 85.8% Michigan 47.3% Ohio 30.7%
    Utah 170.8% Iowa 110.3% Virginia 82.9% Wyoming 46.5% Hawaii 30.4%
    Tennessee 169.0% Oregon 108.0% Missouri 80.8% Pennsylvania 37.6% North Dakota 29.0%
    Nebraska 164.7% Alabama 101.6% South Dakota 74.6% California 37.2% Rhode Island 25.4%
    Colorado 159.7% Delaware 101.6% Maryland 65.3% New York 35.6% West Virginia 23.4%
    Arizona 135.9% Oklahoma 101.2% Florida 60.6% Massachusetts 34.7% Montana 19.0%
    Kentucky 135.3% Indiana 97.9% Illinois 60.6% Louisiana 32.6% Maine 1.1%
    Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Quote Originally Posted by goandykid View Post
    Here's an interesting stat between South and North

    Percentage change in Foreign Born Population 1990 to 2000
    North Carolina 273.7% South Carolina 132.1% Mississippi 95.8% Wisconsin 59.4% Vermont 32.5%
    Georgia 233.4% Minnesota 130.4% Washington 90.7% New Jersey 52.7% Connecticut 32.4%
    Nevada 202.0% Idaho 121.7% Texas 90.2% Alaska 49.8% New Hampshire 31.5%
    Arkansas 196.3% Kansas 114.4% New Mexico 85.8% Michigan 47.3% Ohio 30.7%
    Utah 170.8% Iowa 110.3% Virginia 82.9% Wyoming 46.5% Hawaii 30.4%
    Tennessee 169.0% Oregon 108.0% Missouri 80.8% Pennsylvania 37.6% North Dakota 29.0%
    Nebraska 164.7% Alabama 101.6% South Dakota 74.6% California 37.2% Rhode Island 25.4%
    Colorado 159.7% Delaware 101.6% Maryland 65.3% New York 35.6% West Virginia 23.4%
    Arizona 135.9% Oklahoma 101.2% Florida 60.6% Massachusetts 34.7% Montana 19.0%
    Kentucky 135.3% Indiana 97.9% Illinois 60.6% Louisiana 32.6% Maine 1.1%
    Source: U.S. Census 1990 and 2000
    This reflects the last ten years, in NYC it goes further than that.
    It's said that changes and events occur first in NYC before it goes nationwide.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Do you have a link.

  17. #17
    Registered User

    goandykid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,376
    Rep Points
    3146535


  18. #18
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Thanks.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Here we go GoAndy.


    Latinos on the rise in the city

    South Asians' growth also significant in '05
    BY BRIAN KATES
    DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER



    As the number of whites and African-Americans continues to decline in the city, Hispanic and South Asian populations have grown by leaps and bounds, the latest U.S. Census Bureau figures show.

    But within each ethnic group, the numbers show significant shifts in the status quo.

    In Latino New York, more and more immigrants from the Dominican Republic, Mexico and, more recently, Ecuador, are elbowing for their place at New York's table of opportunity alongside the long-dominant Puerto Ricans.

    And among Asians, Chinese still vastly outnumber all other national origins. But their growth has slowed dramatically while the numbers among other groups - notably Indians and other South Asians - are skyrocketing.

    These trends are seen in figures from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2005 American Community Survey, made public today.
    Although demographers warn that margins of error in this annual data make the figures considerably less reliable than those released every 10 years, they do provide a snapshot of the (now not quite) 8 million stories in the City of New York.

    Between 2000 and 2005, the city's total population dropped from 8,008,278 to 7,956,113. The number of whites dropped 77,173, to 3,499,212 and the black population slipped by 117,800, to 2,011,962, according to the Census Bureau.

    But Latinos - who can be of any race - grew from 2,160,554 to 2,221,906 in those five years, accounting for 28% of the city's population. That's nearly double their percentage in the nation.

    Vibrant Spanish-speaking neighborhoods exist in every borough, of course. But in the Bronx the motto could be changed from the Latin "Ne Cede Malis," meaning "Yield Not to Misfortunes" to "Aqui Se Habla Español," meaning "Spanish is Spoken Here."
    At 684,361, Latinos are the borough's primary ethnic group.

    Citywide, Puerto Ricans remain the dominant Latino group, numbering 787,046. But their numbers dropped between 2004 and 2005, while those of other Hispanic groups rose.

    Dominicans, the city's second-largest Latino group, reached 532,620 in 2005, up from 512,087 in '04. The Mexican population also continued to climb between 2004 and 2005 (233,755 to 244,411).

    But the numbers only begin to tell the story.
    "There is a lot of sensitivity on the part of Puerto Ricans because of all the focus on immigrants," said Angelo Falcon, president of the National Institute of Latino Policy. "In many people's minds, it seems as if we have disappeared."

    Many Puerto Ricans have risen to middle-class status, "moving to Long Island, upstate, New Jersey, Florida or back to Puerto Rico," Falcon said.
    In any case, the decline in Puerto Rican numbers could cause a seismic shift in the city's all-important ethnic power base.

    "Politically, what gives Puerto Ricans a dominance is not just their numbers but the fact that they come here as citizens," Falcon noted. "The decrease takes away from the number of eligible voters, and over time that could become a big issue."

    City College's Dominican Studies Institute has predicted that Dominicans will outnumber Puerto Ricans as the city's biggest Latino group by 2010.

    Meanwhile, although Asians are the smallest of New York's major ethnic groups, their numbers are growing the most rapidly - from 787,047 in 2000 to 922,978 in 2005.
    Now, as in the past, the Chinese, with 428,079 in 2005, have the biggest Asian numbers, and the greatest clout. But their growth has slowed in the past year - as has their population lead versus the South Asian population, which includes natives of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

    "Many more South Asians are immigrating, and their numbers are significant," said John Liu (D-Queens), a Chinese immigrant who became the city's first Asian councilman in 2001. "Their force is making an impact." Added Bryan Pu-Folkes, executive director of the Queens-based group New Immigrant Community Empowerment: "In 2009, when many City Council seats open up, I think we may have a fair chance of electing our first South Asian to City Council."

    Originally published on November 13, 2006

  20. #20
    Registered User

    goandykid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,376
    Rep Points
    3146535

    Interesting, were there any related National figures?

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Quote Originally Posted by goandykid View Post
    Interesting, were there any related National figures?
    Nah, just that. It was in todays paper.

  22. #22
    Registered User

    goandykid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,376
    Rep Points
    3146535

    I wish we had another Irish Immigration Invasion.

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Quote Originally Posted by goandykid View Post
    I wish we had another Irish Immigration Invasion.
    Doubt it, they are doing really good there....from what I heard. Lots of cumputer work...

  24. #24
    Registered User

    goandykid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,376
    Rep Points
    3146535

    Quote Originally Posted by min0 lee View Post
    Doubt it, they are doing really good there....from what I heard. Lots of cumputer work...
    Yea the Rep of Ireland is econimcally strong. I'm jssut saying, I want my immigrants to actually assimilate.

  25. #25
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Quote Originally Posted by goandykid View Post
    Yea the Rep of Ireland is econimcally strong. I'm jssut saying, I want my immigrants to actually assimilate.
    They have in a big way.

  26. #26
    Registered User

    KataKlysm954's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Fort lauderdale, Florida
    Posts
    203
    Rep Points
    10

    cant really be to strict with immigration.... i mean, after all who would build all the houses, mow the lawns, and do your roof... without imigrants lots of businesses would be stopped.

  27. #27
    Registered User

    goandykid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,376
    Rep Points
    3146535

    Quote Originally Posted by KataKlysm954 View Post
    cant really be to strict with immigration.... i mean, after all who would build all the houses, mow the lawns, and do your roof... without imigrants lots of businesses would be stopped.
    I know, I'm not oen of those punishable by death, kick them all into mexico people. However, I did like Arizona's passing of the law that makes English the State Language.

  28. #28
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Quote Originally Posted by goandykid View Post
    I know, I'm not oen of those punishable by death, kick them all into mexico people. However, I did like Arizona's passing of the law that makes English the State Language.
    That was a good move, I wish they would do the same here in NYC with the store front signs.

  29. #29
    Registered User

    KataKlysm954's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Fort lauderdale, Florida
    Posts
    203
    Rep Points
    10

    wish they would pass a law like that down in florida where i live. white people are the minority in the area i live (fort lauderdale not far from miami).

  30. #30
    Registered User

    goandykid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,376
    Rep Points
    3146535

    Yeah, definately. I wiki'd my city (herndon) and foudn that it was censused at a quarter hispanic. I hate reading Spanish on every sign underneath English. This is America.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-24-2010, 12:19 PM
  2. How to fix Congress
    By basskiller in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-16-2010, 09:12 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-03-2008, 08:58 AM
  4. Congress Approved Covert ops in Iran
    By ZECH in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-02-2008, 02:21 PM
  5. Congress to Hold Hearings on Steroid Use
    By Prince in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-02-2008, 05:15 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.