Thread: Weapon of mass destruction

Originally Posted by maniclion

Maybe not better, but you said similar so there must be some intel.....I'd work in the intel field and try to find out what they were doing so then we could protect against it, same reason I chose to be in communications in the Navy I'd rather prevent tragedy instead of cause it....

Similar only in the sense that it is a weapon of mass destruction, though. That should've been clarified.

Originally Posted by Little Wing

i'd have done it yesterday.

Originally Posted by Little Wing

n i'd make 2 just to play it safe.

If I weren't so happily married I'd be on my way to propose right now

Originally Posted by Squaggleboggin

Similar only in the sense that it is a weapon of mass destruction, though. That should've been clarified.

Why can't I make a weapon of mass prevention. Why won't you let me do it.....why why why!? Why do you want to kill people instead of saving them?

Originally Posted by maniclion

Why can't I make a weapon of mass prevention. Why won't you let me do it.....why why why!? Why do you want to kill people instead of saving them?

I'm not saying you can't; I'm just asking how you would go about it with only the information at hand. Surely if you had some crafty way of stopping all weapons of mass destruction you'd tell us... right? Heh...

Originally Posted by Squaggleboggin

I'm not saying you can't; I'm just asking how you would go about it with only the information at hand. Surely if you had some crafty way of stopping all weapons of mass destruction you'd tell us... right? Heh...

It's called marijuana but for some reason I have to do the research while hiding in my home and at concerts and can't seem to hold onto it long enough to extract it's peace increasing properties before it all disappears in a purple haze...... I f I could I would put it in the drinking water of my country and the others, better put it in all the alcohol to for guys like Fletcher.....

Originally Posted by maniclion

Why can't I make a weapon of mass prevention. Why won't you let me do it.....why why why!? Why do you want to kill people instead of saving them?

Dude..... If they could let you design a chemical intervention weapon, I'd be all for it

Hell I'd go outside and start a ruckus just so you'd shoot it at me

Originally Posted by Witmaster

Dude..... If they could let you design a chemical intervention weapon, I'd be all for it

Hell I'd go outside and start a ruckus just so you'd shoot it at me

Well I have suggested instead of tear gassing people why not laughing gas them? I have some progressive ideas...

Originally Posted by Witmaster

If I weren't so happily married I'd be on my way to propose right now

probably a lot of people wish they could just kill all the "bad guys" n make the world a better place. defining "bad guy" is where it get's tricky. sometimes the bad guy is us

Originally Posted by maniclion

Well I have suggested instead of tear gassing people why not laughing gas them? I have some progressive ideas...

crime should not be rewarded.

Originally Posted by Little Wing

probably a lot of people wish they could just kill all the "bad guys" n make the world a better place. defining "bad guy" is where it get's tricky. sometimes the bad guy is us

True... but if it's my children at stake then... yes. I'm willing to be a "bad guy".

being the bad guy to your kids is hardest. discipline is so necessary but i hate when they are mad at me.

Originally Posted by Little Wing

being the bad guy to your kids is hardest. discipline is so necessary but i hate when they are mad at me.

I see your point... I wasn't really talking about disciplining my children.

I was referring to killing another armed child who was attempting to do harm to my family and friends.

And honestly... I have no doubt your Children know you have their best interest at heart.

They may not see it right away but, in time, they will.

Originally Posted by Squaggleboggin

Here's the situation:

You're the best scientist your country has. Your country is involved in a war. The government asks you to create a weapon of mass destruction. You are the best person to do the job in your country. The enemies have already begun to create similar weapons. Would you create the weapon and defend your country, knowing that if you refused your country would be unable to beat the other in making the weapon, and quite possibly killing most of your fellow countrymen? Remember, you're the best person for the job. If you refuse, the others who would work on the project would be unable to beat the enemy in the creation. You're the only one that stands a chance in doing so. Refusing to do so will not end the war. Agreeing to do so won't necessarily end it either.

What would you do?

absolutely I would do it, two wrongs always make a right.

i know. i think the fear of anything happening to permanently separate you from those you love would draw a hard fast line in the sand between "us" and "them" and that that fear would overcome any aversion to acts we would hope to never have to decide upon.

Originally Posted by Prince

absolutely I would do it, two wrongs always make a right.

Apparently you missed the whole premise behind Mutually Assured destruction.

If they can kill us with a WMD but the only thing stopping them is the fact that we will kill them with a WMD then essentially what you've said is true. two wrongs do (in fact) make a right.

But... if you're willing to wager the lives of the 300+ million citizens of the country on a hunch that simply holding hands and singing campfire songs will deter an enemy attack then feel free to run for office. Just be sure to run on the Dems ticket.

Originally Posted by Witmaster

Apparently you missed the whole premise behind Mutually Assured destruction.

If they can kill us with a WMD but the only thing stopping them is the fact that we will kill them with a WMD then essentially what you've said is true. two wrongs do (in fact) make a right.

But... if you're willing to wager the lives of the 300+ million citizens of the country on a hunch that simply holding hands and singing campfire songs will deter an enemy attack then feel free to run for office. Just be sure to run on the Dems ticket.

Originally Posted by Witmaster

Apparently you missed the whole premise behind Mutually Assured destruction.

If they can kill us with a WMD but the only thing stopping them is the fact that we will kill them with a WMD then essentially what you've said is true. two wrongs do (in fact) make a right.

But... if you're willing to wager the lives of the 300+ million citizens of the country on a hunch that simply holding hands and singing campfire songs will deter an enemy attack then feel free to run for office. Just be sure to run on the Dems ticket.

dude, you really don't get me and my sarcastic remarks do you?

Originally Posted by Prince

dude, you really don't get me and my sarcastic remarks do you?

Actually, I do..... I just found your post to have a sort of "BigDyl'ish" ring to it so I used your remark as a springboard to address the original question of the thread.

Originally Posted by Witmaster

Actually, I do..... I just found your post to have a sort of "BigDyl'ish" ring to it so I used your remark as a springboard to address the original question of the thread.

That wasn't a very nice thing to say.

Originally Posted by Witmaster

Actually, I do..... I just found your post to have a sort of "BigDyl'ish" ring to it so I used your remark as a springboard to address the original question of the thread.

I did read the original question which is why I posted my stupid, sarcastic response, I felt that dignifying it with anything half serious was kind of silly.

Originally Posted by DOMS

That wasn't a very nice thing to say.

Well, you're probably right. The only thing missing from his post was "True Story"

Originally Posted by Witmaster

Well, you're probably right. The only thing missing from his post was "True Story"

Originally Posted by Witmaster

Well, you're probably right. The only thing missing from his post was "True Story"

How did you know about that?

#9

and so it begins anew

:d

Originally Posted by Little Wing

crime should not be rewarded.

Have you ever been diabled by laughter, I have sometimes so hard I cried and got pains in my sides and doubled over in pain.....I've also been tear gassed.....if you want people to settle down making them laugh uncontrollably is a better situation....they won't be as irritable after the gas wears off...plus a lot of tear gassings happen with many innocent people just trying to get out of the way of rioters....