The Official 'Debate Decker Thread'

BigDyl · 02-08-2007, 10:21 AM

Come one, come all. To a round of political debate ungainst the undeafeated, heavyweight debate champion of IM, Deeeccckkkkerrrrr.

Let's get it on!

First topic: Should we attack Iran?

ReproMan · 02-08-2007, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDyl

Come one, come all. To a round of political debate ungainst the undeafeated, heavyweight debate champion of IM, Deeeccckkkkerrrrr.

Let's get it on!

First topic: Should we attack Iran?

I say we contract Rickson Gracie to go in there and single handedly wipe out their army en route to disposing all of the nukes. Problem solved.

ALBOB · 02-08-2007, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDyl

Come one, come all. To a round of political debate ungainst the undeafeated, heavyweight debate champion of IM, Deeeccckkkkerrrrr.

Let's get it on!

First topic: Should we attack Iran?

No. There's no need. The media darling, Imanutjob, is the only one who's making any noise. The rest of the country is not excited at ALL about the possiblity of a war with us. Besides, they've tasted freedom and they want more. If we don't mess this up by getting involved, they're going to have their own civil war and the situation will handle itself.

NordicNacho · 02-08-2007, 11:23 AM

We should just use the same invasion plan we had for Iraq. It seems to be working good.

KelJu · 02-08-2007, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NordicNacho

We should just use the same invasion plan we had for Iraq. It seems to be working good.

BoneCrusher · 02-08-2007, 11:42 AM

If you know anyone who IS in Iran, beg them to exit.

DOMS · 02-08-2007, 11:58 AM

We should just bomb the shit out of Iran, smoke 'em if you've got 'em, and then go home.

That "spreading democracy" shit has got to go.

ABCs · 02-08-2007, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DOMS

We should just bomb the shit out of Iran, smoke 'em if you've got 'em, and then go home.

That "spreading democracy" shit has got to go.

Bingo, we cripple their nuclear program with quick, concentrated aerial bombings. There is minimal casualties and maximum damage done to their weaponry.

DOMS · 02-08-2007, 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ABCs

Bingo, we cripple their nuclear program with quick, concentrated aerial bombings. There is minimal casualties and maximum damage done to their weaponry.

Cripple? We should make an example out of them.

BigDyl · 02-08-2007, 12:11 PM

Decker, you're turn.

DOMS · 02-08-2007, 12:25 PM

Cock rider.

goandykid · 02-08-2007, 12:40 PM

Next question.

BigDyl · 02-08-2007, 01:08 PM

We'll take Decker's silence to mean he is against it.

Well played Decker. Well played.

Round 1 goes to Decker.

**dg806** · 02-08-2007, 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALBOB

No. There's no need. The media darling, Imanutjob, is the only one who's making any noise. The rest of the country is not excited at ALL about the possiblity of a war with us. Besides, they've tasted freedom and they want more. If we don't mess this up by getting involved, they're going to have their own civil war and the situation will handle itself.

Yeah but that could last hundreds of years!

DOMS · 02-08-2007, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDyl

We'll take Decker's silence to mean he is against it.

Well played Decker. Well played.

Round 1 goes to Decker.

DOMS · 02-08-2007, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dg806

Yeah but that could last hundreds of years!

Arabs killing Arabs? So that'd be...a normal day in the Middle East then?

Besides, what a 100 more years when they've already been at it for at least 2000 years?

maniclion · 02-08-2007, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALBOB

No. There's no need. The media darling, Imanutjob, is the only one who's making any noise. The rest of the country is not excited at ALL about the possiblity of a war with us. Besides, they've tasted freedom and they want more. If we don't mess this up by getting involved, they're going to have their own civil war and the situation will handle itself.

Yeah that guy in Iran is about as popular in his own country as that guy in The Whitehouse is in our country, maybe we should just dump them on Midway Island and let them duke it out?

maniclion · 02-08-2007, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DOMS

We should just bomb the shit out of Iran, smoke 'em if you've got 'em, and then go home.

That "spreading democracy" shit has got to go.

No way I am so glad the Republican Party has begun to see the Liberal side of Nation saving and welfare for a country that was once under a dictator, I think we should continue with this policy until we have saved all of the countries in dire need of our hard earned dollars, that way when the money's down we can go back to States Rights to regulate and not big Government. It's a brilliant plan....

And Texas can finally secede once and for all.......

and the Bush family can become it's monarchy!

Decker · 02-08-2007, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDyl

....First topic: Should we attack Iran?

No.

We should continue down the long and arduous road of negotiations and such. It ain't pretty but it's a hell of a lot cheaper than an all out attack.

It is too bad that no one in the Bush administration has any capacity for civilized foreign relations.

War as a first option worked so well in Iraq that we should just avoid it. We don't want to lose two wars now do we?

maniclion · 02-08-2007, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Decker

No.

We should continue down the long and arduous road of negotiations and such. It ain't pretty but it's a hell of a lot cheaper than an all out attack.

It is too bad that no one in the Bush administration has any capacity for civilized foreign relations.

War as a first option worked so well in Iraq that we should just avoid it. We don't want to lose two wars now do we?

Nope we should nuke them before they nuke us....thats what we should do period. Then we use the glass sheet left behind to cover solar modules which we will donate to the survivors to start a new....

BoneCrusher · 02-08-2007, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maniclion

No way I am so glad the Republican Party has begun to see the Liberal side of Nation saving and welfare for a country that was once under a dictator, I think we should continue with this policy until we have saved all of the countries in dire need of our hard earned dollars, that way when the money's down we can go back to States Rights to regulate and not big Government. It's a brilliant plan....

And Texas can finally secede once and for all....... and the Bush family can become it's monarchy!

Don't make me come over there ...

maniclion · 02-08-2007, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maniclion

Nope we should nuke them before they nuke us....thats what we should do period. Then we use the glass sheet left behind to cover solar modules which we will donate to the survivors to start a new....

Oh and Iran will become part of our new Empire, we will name it Texas II, until the day Texas secedes, then it'll just be Texas.

goandykid · 02-08-2007, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maniclion

Oh and Iran will become part of our new Empire, we will name it Texas II, until the day Texas secedes, then it'll just be Texas.

You mean New Texas.

maniclion · 02-08-2007, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goandykid

You mean New Texas.

No, they will take the name Texas since old Tejas will be Bushland.

Decker · 02-09-2007, 01:32 PM

Now we have this:
Gates describes Iraq evidence against Iran

Info on explosives shows Tehran 'very much involved,' Pentagon chief says

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17064803/

The Iraq invasion made this possible. Take out a moderately stable secular government in a country populated by religious sects and replace it with a 'democracy. Well hey ho big shooter, now we have the Shia majority step in as the ruling party and move against the Sunni minority. And as a bonus, the Shia party of Iraq is sympatico with the Shia party that runs Iran.

So Iran has an influence on Iraq. Wow. Who could have seen this one coming down the pike.

I mean now we have to, no, we must attack Iraq also.

Now the SURGE makes sense.

But Iran is aiding the largely Sunni insurgency....Boy that doesn't make a lot of sense does it? How do we flesh this out? How do we deal with seemingly contradictory 'evidence?"

BigDyl · 02-09-2007, 01:35 PM

Point: Decker

Round 1 goes to Decker.

Round 2...starting in 5 minutes.

BoneCrusher · 02-09-2007, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maniclion

No, they will take the name Texas since old Tejas will be Bushland.

Nah ... we all hate BushCo here now. BTW just 'cause the BushCo crime family imigrated here from Coneticunt to avoid personal income tax doesn't make em Texans.

02-08-2007, 11:23 AM	#4
NordicNacho Registered User Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,425 Photos: 18	We should just use the same invasion plan we had for Iraq. It seems to be working good. http://www.roqofthe80s.com/#

02-08-2007, 12:40 PM	#12
goandykid Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 4,378	Next question. You guys are going to lose. You might as well just cheer for me, because Boston isn’t winning in Boston for the season opener. I’m sorry. " - Gilbert Arenas

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

02-08-2007, 11:42 AM	#6
BoneCrusher Lift or Die Elite Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Austin Texas Posts: 8,589	If you know anyone who IS in Iran, beg them to exit.

02-08-2007, 11:58 AM	#7
DOMS Metrosexual Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 22,092 Photos: 1	We should just bomb the shit out of Iran, smoke 'em if you've got 'em, and then go home. That "spreading democracy" shit has got to go.

02-08-2007, 12:25 PM	#11
DOMS Metrosexual Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 22,092 Photos: 1	Cock rider.

02-09-2007, 01:32 PM	#25
Decker % Elite Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Milwaukee Posts: 2,051	Now we have this: Gates describes Iraq evidence against Iran Info on explosives shows Tehran 'very much involved,' Pentagon chief says http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17064803/ The Iraq invasion made this possible. Take out a moderately stable secular government in a country populated by religious sects and replace it with a 'democracy. Well hey ho big shooter, now we have the Shia majority step in as the ruling party and move against the Sunni minority. And as a bonus, the Shia party of Iraq is sympatico with the Shia party that runs Iran. So Iran has an influence on Iraq. Wow. Who could have seen this one coming down the pike. I mean now we have to, no, we must attack Iraq also. Now the SURGE makes sense. But Iran is aiding the largely Sunni insurgency....Boy that doesn't make a lot of sense does it? How do we flesh this out? How do we deal with seemingly contradictory 'evidence?"