Why can some bands create a good album or hit song...

BigDyl · 02-24-2007, 10:22 PM

...that everyone connects with... yet somehow they can never reproduce the same effect?

</Vieope>

Vieope · 02-25-2007, 02:52 AM

Awesome thread but I dont really know the answer.

**Gazhole** · 02-25-2007, 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDyl

...that everyone connects with... yet somehow they can never reproduce the same effect?

</Vieope>

They're one-hit-wonders. They have one great idea, but arent creative enough to come up with a second great idea, or they get jaded by the music business and this taints their judgement on what is actually great.

See: Metallica.

BigDyl · 02-25-2007, 11:26 AM

Good answer.

goob · 02-25-2007, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDyl

Good answer.

Good question.

dodgyone · 02-26-2007, 06:03 AM

I always like to think that there is a song (or poem) in everybody worthy of being a big hit. Some people find theirs and become one-hit wonders. The long lasting artists are more creatively gifted than the norm so can rise up above this limitation.

ponyboy · 02-26-2007, 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gazhole

They're one-hit-wonders. They have one great idea, but arent creative enough to come up with a second great idea, or they get jaded by the music business and this taints their judgement on what is actually great.

See: Metallica.

Metallica has been around for over 20 years with tens of millions of albums sold. I hardly call them one hit wonders. Judgement impaired...maybe.

zombul · 02-26-2007, 08:41 AM

Perhaps these bands have used all of their best material and songs with the deepest meaning they have come up with over long periods of time and they get signed for having some good stuff that they may have been writing since high-school.There is pressure to put out a follow up so they don't have the time to put the energy and emotion into it because they are jotting down words that may rhyme but they don't feel them so the heart of the band isn't "in it".The follow up material is probably done in a year or so while the original may have taken several years.

**Gazhole** · 02-26-2007, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ponyboy

Metallica has been around for over 20 years with tens of millions of albums sold. I hardly call them one hit wonders. Judgement impaired...maybe.

No, they fall under the second category (Jaded by the 'biz).

Though only the one album (Puppets) really "spoke" to me. The two before it were just building up to Puppets, Justice was pretty good but not quite as awesome, and from the Black Album onwards it all went to hell, culminating in St Anger, which is one of the worst "metal" albums ive heard in a while.

Though Slayer's Christ Illusion comes close in the "Dissapointing Comeback Albums" category. The only thing that saves it is that the sound of the record is decent, its just the songs that suck.

The only thing post-Puppets that Metallica have done that i truly enjoy was the S+M version of For Whom The Bell Tolls. If i ever get drafted into the military i want that version of the track playing when im out there. Its inspiring as fuck.

**Gazhole** · 02-26-2007, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zombul

Perhaps these bands have used all of their best material and songs with the deepest meaning they have come up with over long periods of time and they get signed for having some good stuff that they may have been writing since high-school.

There was one thing Devin Townsend (see:genius) said like that, something along the lines of "Most bands write their best material when they're young, because they're angry as fuck, but when they get older they mellow out and its not quite as good anymore."

Which is kinda true i think.

goob · 02-26-2007, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gazhole

No, they fall under the second category (Jaded by the 'biz).

Though only the one album (Puppets) really "spoke" to me. The two before it were just building up to Puppets, Justice was pretty good but not quite as awesome, and from the Black Album onwards it all went to hell, culminating in St Anger, which is one of the worst "metal" albums ive heard in a while.

Though Slayer's Christ Illusion comes close in the "Dissapointing Comeback Albums" category. The only thing that saves it is that the sound of the record is decent, its just the songs that suck.

The only thing post-Puppets that Metallica have done that i truly enjoy was the S+M version of For Whom The Bell Tolls. If i ever get drafted into the military i want that version of the track playing when im out there. Its inspiring as fuck.

What are you on about? Although not the greatest fan, Ride the Lightening to The Black album were generally high quality. St Anger was rubbish, mainly due to the new bassist and that really shitty de-tuned sound that is far too rife in metal these days. So much so that i hardly listen to metal anymore. The snare drums sound on St Anger was crap too (to be pedantic). I don't think I've heard one song by anyone that is good with that shitty bass sound.

Bang on about From whom the bell tolls....that's made to be a war soundtrack.

**Gazhole** · 02-26-2007, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goob

What are you on about? Although not the greatest fan, Ride the Lightening to The Black album were generally high quality. St Anger was rubbish, mainly due to the new bassist and that really shitty de-tuned sound that is far too rife in metal these days. So much so that i hardly listen to metal anymore. The snare drums sound on St Anger was crap too (to be pedantic). I don't think I've heard one song by anyone that is good with that shitty bass sound.

Bang on about From whom the bell tolls....that's made to be a war soundtrack.

Ride The Lightening was awesome, Kill Em All i wasnt a HUGE fan of for some reason, but Seek And Destroy is one of my favourite metal songs.

Im not saying those two albums are shit, i just meant they were paving the way for the much much better Puppets.

As for the Black Album, meh. I'll agree to Disagree with everybody on that one, because i just dislike 90% of everything that album is. The 10% i do like is Enter Sandman, haha.

But yeah, St Anger is universally despised i think.

goob · 02-26-2007, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gazhole

Ride The Lightening was awesome, Kill Em All i wasnt a HUGE fan of for some reason, but Seek And Destroy is one of my favourite metal songs.

Im not saying those two albums are shit, i just meant they were paving the way for the much much better Puppets.

As for the Black Album, meh. I'll agree to Disagree with everybody on that one, because i just dislike 90% of everything that album is. The 10% i do like is Enter Sandman, haha.

But yeah, St Anger is universally despised i think.

Fair enough, I agree that the first two were building blocks for Puppets, which was superior. Most I know love the black album. Ok, it's a little softer, but the quality of songwriting is excellent throughout, so much so, that I would possibly consider it to be their best work.

I always thought they were at their best mixing classical guitar techniques with metal.

Favouristes: Sanatarium, Fade to Black, Wherever I may Roam, To live is to die.

**Gazhole** · 02-26-2007, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goob

Fair enough, I agree that the first two were building blocks for Puppets, which was superior. Most I know love the black album. Ok, it's a little softer, but the quality of songwriting is excellent throughout, so much so, that I would possibly consider it to be their best work.

I always thought they were at their best mixing classical guitar techniques with metal.

Favouristes: Sanatarium, Fade to Black, Wherever I may Roam, To live is to die.

Im partial to "The Thing That Should Not Be". Mostly because i read a lot of HP Lovecraft, so the lyrics take on a far more sinister edge, lol.

BigDyl · 02-26-2007, 11:38 AM

Tool pwns all.

goob · 02-26-2007, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDyl

Tool pwns all.

So the girls tell me.....

**Gazhole** · 02-26-2007, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goob

So the girls tell me.....

BigDyl · 02-26-2007, 11:47 AM

ponyboy · 02-26-2007, 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goob

Fair enough, I agree that the first two were building blocks for Puppets, which was superior. Most I know love the black album. Ok, it's a little softer, but the quality of songwriting is excellent throughout, so much so, that I would possibly consider it to be their best work.

I always thought they were at their best mixing classical guitar techniques with metal.

Favouristes: Sanatarium, Fade to Black, Wherever I may Roam, To live is to die.

I think it's funny (and appropriate) that none of us Metallica fans even mention Load or Reload - I think they are better off forgotten in the garbage.

I think the reason the Black Album didnt resonate with real fans is because it was a departure from the music they made for the previous albums. It was far more mainstream so they could get the radio and video play they needed to sell albums, which they did. Smart move, but yes, not a typical album.

goob · 02-26-2007, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ponyboy

I think it's funny (and appropriate) that none of us Metallica fans even mention Load or Reload - I think they are better off forgotten in the garbage.

I think the reason the Black Album didnt resonate with real fans is because it was a departure from the music they made for the previous albums. It was far more mainstream so they could get the radio and video play they needed to sell albums, which they did. Smart move, but yes, not a typical album.

That's very true. It was watered down from previous albums, and even the songwriting structure deviated towards typical 'radio-friendly' rock. Even the hooks used were more accessable. Smart move indeed, its the one Metallica album you see in people's record collections.

02-25-2007, 02:52 AM	#2
Vieope Monochromatic Bunny Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: drinking coffee.. Posts: 14,815 Photos: 10	Awesome thread but I dont really know the answer.
	FURtherness

02-26-2007, 06:03 AM	#6
dodgyone Always learning... Join Date: May 2003 Location: Guernsey, Channel Islands Posts: 107	I always like to think that there is a song (or poem) in everybody worthy of being a big hit. Some people find theirs and become one-hit wonders. The long lasting artists are more creatively gifted than the norm so can rise up above this limitation.
	Proteins are good... Fats are good... Carbs are the problem!

02-26-2007, 08:41 AM	#8
zombul SB MUSCLE REP Elite Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Power Rack Posts: 1,700	Perhaps these bands have used all of their best material and songs with the deepest meaning they have come up with over long periods of time and they get signed for having some good stuff that they may have been writing since high-school.There is pressure to put out a follow up so they don't have the time to put the energy and emotion into it because they are jotting down words that may rhyme but they don't feel them so the heart of the band isn't "in it".The follow up material is probably done in a year or so while the original may have taken several years.

02-26-2007, 12:32 PM	#21
Gazhole iwillmakeyousmelltheglove Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Wales, UK Posts: 5,769 Photos: 6