IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum


Go Back   IronMagazine Bodybuilding Forum > General Interests Forums > Open Chat
Photo Gallery Register Members List Videos Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Open Chat General adult talk about life, relationships or whatever you want to discuss.


Jimmy Carter blows lid off Israel nukes


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-27-2008, 08:41 AM   #1
I See©
Elite Member
 
min0 lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Bronx, NYC
Posts: 31,680
Blog Entries: 3
Photos: 542

Jimmy Carter blows lid off Israel nukes

Jimmy Carter blows lid off Israel nukes



News Wire Services
Tuesday, May 27th 2008, 4:00 AM
LONDON - Loose lips, Jimmy. Loose lips.
Former President Jimmy Carter has revealed Israel holds at least 150 nuclear weapons - the first time a U.S. President has publicly acknowledged the Jewish state's atomic arsenal.
At a news conference in Wales Monday, Carter dropped the bomb while describing how tough it would be for Iran to build a nuclear arsenal. A former Israeli military intelligence chief criticized Carter's comments as "irresponsible."
"The problem is that there are those who can use these statements when it comes to discussing the international effort to prevent Iran getting nuclear weapons," said Aharon Zeevi-Farkash.
Carter, responding to a question, said, "The U.S. has more than 12,000 nuclear weapons, the Soviet Union Russia has about the same, Great Britain and France have several hundred, and Israel has 150 or more ..."
While the existence of Israeli nuclear weapons is widely assumed, Israeli officials have never admitted their existence, and U.S. officials have stuck to that line in public for years.



min0 lee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 08:55 AM   #2
I See©
Elite Member
 
min0 lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Bronx, NYC
Posts: 31,680
Blog Entries: 3
Photos: 542

Irresponsible...yes, but I am glad he did say it.
I think we should lay off catering to the Israelis a bit.



min0 lee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 08:59 AM   #3
Metrosexual
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van, down by the river...
Posts: 21,439
Photos: 5

Good. I wonder if the rag heads will start to lay off the Israelis a bit now?

Oh, and someone really needs to put Jimmy down.



I never lie because I don't fear anyone. You only lie when you're afraid.—John Gotti
DOMS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 09:01 AM   #4
I See©
Elite Member
 
min0 lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Bronx, NYC
Posts: 31,680
Blog Entries: 3
Photos: 542

Quote:
"The problem is that there are those who can use these statements when it comes to discussing the international effort to prevent Iran getting nuclear weapons," said Aharon Xever-Farkash.
The guys right, they will definitely use this to push their need for nukes.

I guess the way they see is that the Israelis are more responsible with their nukes.



min0 lee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 09:03 AM   #5
I See©
Elite Member
 
min0 lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Bronx, NYC
Posts: 31,680
Blog Entries: 3
Photos: 542

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOMS View Post
Good. I wonder if the rag heads will start to lay off the Israelis a bit now?

Oh, and someone really needs to put Jimmy down.
This is not the first time he's put his foot into his mouth.



min0 lee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 09:10 AM   #6
Metrosexual
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van, down by the river...
Posts: 21,439
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by min0 lee View Post
This is not the first time he's put his foot into his mouth.
It started in 1976, I believe. He was addle brained then, and now he's gotten even worse. Why can't he hurry up and die?



I never lie because I don't fear anyone. You only lie when you're afraid.—John Gotti
DOMS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 09:55 AM   #7
Windy City
Elite Member
 
Big Smoothy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,693

Everybody has always known that Israel has nukes in Dimona. Israel is not a member of the AEA, either.

This is a non-story.

On another issue, but related to Zionism,

Carter got Hamas to engage dialogue about conditions for a peace agreement. The Israeli and American Zionists insist on not talking with Hamas - because they don't want to be given conditions for any Peace Agreement, because Israeli and US Zionists do not want a peace agreement. Israel should just come and say it, outright. That is their choice. But instead, they play the "we will not talk with, nor discuss any conditions for peace" (related to pre-1967).

It's not easy to read behind the lines - unless it's the American public.

Jimmy Carter rattled the Jewish and Christian Zionists, almost as bad as Norman Finklestein has. The only difference, is that Carter is Christian and not Jewish.



Big Smoothy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 06:04 PM   #8
primeau
 
lnvanry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 2,977
Photos: 12

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Smoothy View Post
Everybody has always known that Israel has nukes in Dimona. Israel is not a member of the AEA, either.

This is a non-story.

On another issue, but related to Zionism,

Carter got Hamas to engage dialogue about conditions for a peace agreement. The Israeli and American Zionists insist on not talking with Hamas - because they don't want to be given conditions for any Peace Agreement, because Israeli and US Zionists do not want a peace agreement. Israel should just come and say it, outright. That is their choice. But instead, they play the "we will not talk with, nor discuss any conditions for peace" (related to pre-1967).

It's not easy to read behind the lines - unless it's the American public.

Jimmy Carter rattled the Jewish and Christian Zionists, almost as bad as Norman Finklestein has. The only difference, is that Carter is Christian and not Jewish.
ditto....and the fact it is based on intel from the 70s makes it even more of a non story.
lnvanry is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 06:17 PM   #9
Metrosexual
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van, down by the river...
Posts: 21,439
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by lnvanry View Post
ditto....and the fact it is based on intel from the 70s makes it even more of a non story.
Bullshit. He gave out privileged information that he received while president. That's treasonous.



I never lie because I don't fear anyone. You only lie when you're afraid.—John Gotti
DOMS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 06:23 PM   #10
Registered User
 
bio-chem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,931
Photos: 14

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOMS View Post
Bullshit. He gave out privileged information that he received while president. That's treasonous.
don't former presidents still receive some sort of briefing?
bio-chem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 06:24 PM   #11
Metrosexual
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van, down by the river...
Posts: 21,439
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by bio-chem View Post
don't former presidents still receive some sort of briefing?
I don't know, but I bet they travel in circles where they hear "stuff" from time to time.



I never lie because I don't fear anyone. You only lie when you're afraid.—John Gotti
DOMS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 06:26 PM   #12
Registered User
 
bio-chem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,931
Photos: 14

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOMS View Post
I don't know, but I bet they travel in circles where they hear "stuff" from time to time.
annual skulls meetings?
bio-chem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 06:30 PM   #13
Metrosexual
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van, down by the river...
Posts: 21,439
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by bio-chem View Post
annual skulls meetings?
I sent in my application. They turned me down. That said I was too liberal.



I never lie because I don't fear anyone. You only lie when you're afraid.—John Gotti
DOMS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 07:18 PM   #14
I See©
Elite Member
 
min0 lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Bronx, NYC
Posts: 31,680
Blog Entries: 3
Photos: 542

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Smoothy View Post
This is a non-story.

.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lnvanry View Post
ditto....
For the two you it may not mean much but I'm pretty sure Iran and company will use this as an excuse to carry nukes.



min0 lee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 07:37 PM   #15
Gender: MALE
Elite Member
 
danzik17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,899
Blog Entries: 5

Good, they have nukes. Can we stop sending them billions of dollars now? Please?



Ron Paul 2008

Journal: Boom goes the dynamite
danzik17 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 07:40 PM   #16
Registered User
 
bio-chem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,931
Photos: 14

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOMS View Post
I sent in my application. They turned me down. That said I was too liberal.
what's a guy got to do to get some world domination around here?
bio-chem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 09:08 PM   #17
primeau
 
lnvanry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 2,977
Photos: 12

Quote:
Originally Posted by min0 lee View Post
For the two you it may not mean much but I'm pretty sure Iran and company will use this as an excuse to carry nukes.
maybe...but its won't hold under international scrutiny. Any further manufacturing of nukes is illegal under the NPT (including the US...we just have a huge stockpile).

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOMS
Bullshit. He gave out privileged information that he received while president. That's treasonous.
I can agree with you Carter is an idiot, but let's not kid ourselves. Stating Israel has 50-200 nukes isn't privileged information. You seem to utilizing a talking point here.
lnvanry is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 09:31 PM   #18
Metrosexual
Elite Member
 
DOMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a van, down by the river...
Posts: 21,439
Photos: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by lnvanry View Post
I can agree with you Carter is an idiot, but let's not kid ourselves. Stating Israel has 50-200 nukes isn't privileged information. You seem to utilizing a talking point here.
Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot?



I never lie because I don't fear anyone. You only lie when you're afraid.—John Gotti
DOMS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 12:16 AM   #19
Senior Member
Elite Member
 
busyLivin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Crestwood, IL
Posts: 3,485

Quote:
Originally Posted by min0 lee View Post
I'm pretty sure Iran and company will use this as an excuse to carry nukes.
They don't need an excuse.. Nobody is doing anything to stop them. We've got a lame duck president and the peace-loving hippy tree huggers running Congress.

People have it too good here. Shame that it's going to take something big for people to wake up. Electing Obama might be the answer.. he's going to be a catastrophe... maybe even one big enough to rival Jimmy Carter.



class Liberalism
{
public void main(){
while (1 != 2)
{ Bitch(); Moan(); BlameBush(); }}
}
busyLivin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 04:37 AM   #20
I See©
Elite Member
 
min0 lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Bronx, NYC
Posts: 31,680
Blog Entries: 3
Photos: 542

Quote:
Originally Posted by danzik17 View Post
Good, they have nukes. Can we stop sending them billions of dollars now? Please?
Thank you.



min0 lee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 10:00 AM   #21
Windy City
Elite Member
 
Big Smoothy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,693

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOMS View Post
Bullshit. He gave out privileged information that he received while president. That's treasonous.
1. you need government documents to back up this claim.

2. you need to show that it is defined as "treasonous."



Big Smoothy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 02:50 PM   #22
Catalyst
Elite Member
 
maniclion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hawaii, selling munitions for the war on EcoTerror
Posts: 17,661
Photos: 10

Well if he can just blurt out anything then I'll tell you guys about all the intel I gathered while in the system.....

This one time we were flying routine patrols and when all of the sudden our pilots
Executive Order
Further Amendment to Executive Order 12958,
As Amended, Classified National Security Information



By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to further amend Executive Order 12958, as amended, it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12958 is amended to read as follows:
"Classified National Security Information
This order prescribes a uniform system for classifying, safeguarding, and declassifying national security information, including information relating to defense against transnational terrorism. Our democratic principles require that the American people be informed of the activities of their Government. Also, our Nations progress depends on the free flow of information. Nevertheless, throughout our history, the national defense has required that certain information be maintained in confidence in order to protect our citizens, our democratic institutions, our homeland security, and our interactions with foreign nations. Protecting information critical to our Nations security remains a priority.
NOW, THEREFORE, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
PART 1--ORIGINAL CLASSIFICATION
Sec. 1.1. Classification Standards. (a) Information may be originally classified under the terms of this order only if all of the following conditions are met:
(1) an original classification authority is classifying the information;
(2) the information is owned by, produced by or for, or is under the control of the United States Government;
(3) the information falls within one or more of the categories of information listed in section 1.4 of this order; and
(4) the original classification authority determines that the unauthorized disclosure of the information reasonably could be expected to result in damage to the national security, which includes defense against transnational terrorism, and the original classi-fication authority is able to identify or describe the damage.
(b) Classified information shall not be declassified automatically as a result of any unauthorized disclosure of identical or similar information.
(c) The unauthorized disclosure of foreign government information is presumed to cause damage to the national security.
Sec. 1.2. Classification Levels. (a) Information may be classified at one of the following three levels:
(1) "Top Secret" shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe.
(2) "Secret" shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause serious damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe.
(3) "Confidential" shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe.
(b) Except as otherwise provided by statute, no other terms shall be used to identify United States classified information.
Sec. 1.3. Classification Authority. (a) The authority to classify information originally may be exercised only by:
(1) the President and, in the performance of executive duties, the Vice President;
(2) agency heads and officials designated by the President in the Federal Register; and
(3) United States Government officials delegated this authority pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Officials authorized to classify information at a specified level are also authorized to classify information at a lower level.
(c) Delegation of original classification authority.
(1) Delegations of original classification authority shall be limited to the minimum required to administer this order.
Agency heads are responsible for ensuring that designated subordinate officials have a demonstrable and continuing need to exercise this authority.
(2) "Top Secret" original classification authority may be delegated only by the President; in the performance of executive duties, the Vice President; or an agency head or official designated pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(3) "Secret" or "Confidential" original classification authority may be delegated only by the President; in the performance of executive duties, the Vice President; or an agency head or official designated pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section; or the senior agency official described in section 5.4(d) of this order, provided that official has been delegated "Top Secret" original classification authority by the agency head.
(4) Each delegation of original classification authority shall be in writing and the authority shall not be redelegated except as provided in this order. Each delegation shall identify the official by name or position title.
(d) Original classification authorities must receive training in original classification as provided in this order and its implementing directives. Such training must include instruction on the proper safeguarding of classified information and of the criminal, civil, and administrative sanctions that may be brought against an individual who fails to protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure.
(e) Exceptional cases. When an employee, government contractor, licensee, certificate holder, or grantee of an agency who does not have original classification authority originates information believed by that person to require classification, the infor-mation shall be protected in a manner consistent with this order and its implementing directives. The information shall be transmitted promptly as provided under this order or its implementing directives to the agency that has appropriate subject matter interest and classification authority with respect to this information. That agency shall decide within 30 days whether to classify this information. If it is not clear which agency has classification responsibility for this information, it shall be sent to the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office. The Director shall determine the agency having primary subject matter interest and forward the information, with appropriate recommendations, to that agency for a classification determination.
Sec. 1.4. Classification Categories. Information shall not be considered for classification unless it concerns:
(a) military plans, weapons systems, or operations;
(b) foreign government information;
(c) intelligence activities (including special activities), intelligence sources or methods, or cryptology;
(d) foreign relations or foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources;
(e) scientific, technological, or economic matters relating to the national security, which includes defense against transnational terrorism;
(f) United States Government programs for safeguarding nuclear materials or facilities;
(g) vulnerabilities or capabilities of systems, installations, infrastructures, projects, plans, or pro-tection services relating to the national security, which includes defense against transnational terrorism; or
(h) weapons of mass destruction.
Sec. 1.5. Duration of Classification. (a) At the time of original classification, the original classification authority shall attempt to establish a specific date or event for declassification based upon the duration of the national security sensitivity of the information. Upon reaching the date or event, the information shall be automatically declassified. The date or event shall not exceed the time frame established in paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) If the original classification authority cannot determine an earlier specific date or event for declassification, information shall be marked for declassification 10 years from the date of the original decision, unless the original classi-fication authority otherwise determines that the sensitivity of the information requires that it shall be marked for declassification for up to 25 years from the date of the original decision. All information classified under this section shall be subject to section 3.3 of this order if it is contained in records of permanent historical value under title 44, United States Code.
(c) An original classification authority may extend the duration of classification, change the level of classification, or reclassify specific information only when the standards and procedures for classifying information under this order are followed.
(d) Information marked for an indefinite duration of classification under predecessor orders, for example, marked as "Originating Agencys Determination Required," or information classified under predecessor orders that contains no declassification instructions shall be declassified in accordance with part 3 of this order.
Sec. 1.6. Identification and Markings. (a) At the time of original classification, the following shall appear on the face of each classified document, or shall be applied to other classified media in an appropriate manner:
(1) one of the three classification levels defined in section 1.2 of this order;
(2) the identity, by name or personal identifier and position, of the original classification authority;
(3) the agency and office of origin, if not otherwise evident;
(4) declassification instructions, which shall indicate one of the following:
(A) the date or event for declassification, as prescribed in section 1.5(a) or section 1.5(c);
(B) the date that is 10 years from the date of original classification, as prescribed in section 1.5(b); or
(C) the date that is up to 25 years from the date of original classification, as prescribed in section 1.5 (b); and
(5) a concise reason for classification that, at a minimum, cites the applicable classification categories in section 1.4
(b) Specific information described in paragraph (a) of this section may be excluded if it would reveal additional classified information.
(c) With respect to each classified document, the agency originating the document shall, by marking or other means, indicate which portions are classified, with the applicable classification level, and which portions are unclassified. In accordance with standards prescribed in directives issued under this order, the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office may grant waivers of this requirement. The Director shall revoke any waiver upon a finding of abuse.
(d) Markings implementing the provisions of this order, including abbreviations and requirements to safeguard classified working papers, shall conform to the standards prescribed in implementing directives issued pursuant to this order.
(e) Foreign government information shall retain its original classification markings or shall be assigned a U.S. classification that provides a degree of protection at least equivalent to that required by the entity that furnished the information. Foreign government information retaining its original classification markings need not be assigned a U.S. classification marking provided that the responsible agency determines that the foreign government markings are adequate to meet the purposes served by U.S. classification markings.
(f) Information assigned a level of classification under this or predecessor orders shall be considered as classified at that level of classification despite the omission of other required markings. Whenever such information is used in the derivative classification process or is reviewed for possible declassification, holders of such information shall coordinate with an appropriate classification authority for the application of omitted markings.
(g) The classification authority shall, whenever practicable, use a classified addendum whenever classified information constitutes a small portion of an otherwise unclassified document.
(h) Prior to public release, all declassified records shall be appropriately marked to reflect their declassification.
Sec. 1.7. Classification Prohibitions and Limitations. (a) In no case shall information be classified in order to:
(1) conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;
(2) prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;
(3) restrain competition; or
(4) prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security.
(b) Basic scientific research information not clearly related to the national security shall not be classified.
(c) Information may be reclassified after declassification and release to the public under proper authority only in accordance with the following conditions:
(1) the reclassification action is taken under the personal authority of the agency head or deputy agency head, who determines in writing that the reclassi-fication of the information is necessary in the interest of the national security;
(2) the information may be