Thread: "Big Shoe" about to drop on Obama

Why'd he or Whitey? I'll let you people decide, mine a swell right?

If he can do a better job of running this country I could less.
Now if he were to give Blacks preferential treatment or make whites sit in the back of the bus or not let them eat with the whites or start the hanging of whites before a trial.....oh wait, it's done.

Never mind.

Nothing like that would surprise me.

There you guys go playing the race card again!!!!

Originally Posted by min0 lee

If he can do a better job of running this country I could less.
Now if he were to give Blacks preferential treatment or make whites sit in the back of the bus or not let them eat with the whites or start the hanging of whites before a trial.....oh wait, it's done.

Never mind.

This is what gets me. My old roommate was telling me how he was going to give black people reparations. Now, how the hell is that going to happen. Besides, if he can get 100 old white men to vote to give black people reparations, I say he should be president of the world. The stupid shit the GOP comes up with. Besides, he is half cracker, so she would be insulting him too.

Great candidate. His plans for peace are to disarm America.

He's also been attending an black supremacist marxist church for 20 years, which preaches all white people are racists, america is inherently racist, and the US is responsible for AIDS to kill black people.

He's also claimed Iranians speak Arabic, claimed his uncle liberated Auschwitz and Treblinka, which unless his uncle was serving in Stalin's Soviet Army is impossible, and says that he wants to raise capital gains taxes despite the fact that when they were raised revenues went down because he thinks raising the cap gains tax is "more fair."

The guy is an utter disaster waiting to happen and I seriously cannot comprehend how anyone would vote for him. I don't like McCain, but he's leaps better, even Hillary looks appealing in comparison. If you're an average democrat, I think McCain would be FAR more preferable, simply because he's much, much more "moderate" and he'll have a democrat house/senate so it's not like he can pass anything "conservative" anyway.

Originally Posted by brogers

even Hillary looks appealing in comparison.

So true & so scary.

Does it really matter? You are fucked for at least a Generation anyway.

Originally Posted by brogers

Great candidate. His plans for peace are to disarm America.

He's also been attending an black supremacist marxist church for 20 years, which preaches all white people are racists, america is inherently racist, and the US is responsible for AIDS to kill black people.

He's also claimed Iranians speak Arabic, claimed his uncle liberated Auschwitz and Treblinka, which unless his uncle was serving in Stalin's Soviet Army is impossible, and says that he wants to raise capital gains taxes despite the fact that when they were raised revenues went down because he thinks raising the cap gains tax is "more fair."

The guy is an utter disaster waiting to happen and I seriously cannot comprehend how anyone would vote for him. I don't like McCain, but he's leaps better, even Hillary looks appealing in comparison. If you're an average democrat, I think McCain would be FAR more preferable, simply because he's much, much more "moderate" and he'll have a democrat house/senate so it's not like he can pass anything "conservative" anyway.

My family out in California is all Democrat (I'm the black sheep). So when I go home, I spend most of my time hanging out with them and their Dem friends. With a rare exception or two, the have all said that they will not vote for Obama. They won't vote for McCaine either. They said they'd just sit this election out.

When more of Obama's anit-white view comes out, even more white Dems will sit this election out.

Originally Posted by Dale Mabry

My old roommate was telling me how he was going to give black people reparations.

Your old roommate is a moron.

Originally Posted by DOMS

My family out in California is all Democrat (I'm the black sheep). So when I go home, I spend most of my time hanging out with them and their Dem friends. With a rare exception or two, the have all said that they will not vote for Obama. They won't vote for McCaine either. They said they'd just sit this election out.

When more of Obama's anit-white view comes out, even more white Dems will sit this election out.

Obviously your family is a bunch of racists, as anyone who doesn't like Barack Obama is a racist.

I honestly think he's going to get clobbered once the 527 groups start putting out ads related to Jeremiah Wright, Pfelger, his wife, domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, etc. You certainly can judge a man by the company he keeps. Quite simply put, Barack Obama loves Marxist racists. It's really that simple.

He's also the chosen candidate of Hamas and Colombia's Marxist FARC rebels.

His economic policies are horrendous. Anyone would be better than Obama. If only Ron Paul had a shot...

Originally Posted by brogers

Great candidate. His plans for peace are to disarm America.

He's also been attending an black supremacist marxist church for 20 years, which preaches all white people are racists, america is inherently racist, and the US is responsible for AIDS to kill black people.

He's also claimed Iranians speak Arabic, claimed his uncle liberated Auschwitz and Treblinka, which unless his uncle was serving in Stalin's Soviet Army is impossible, and says that he wants to raise capital gains taxes despite the fact that when they were raised revenues went down because he thinks raising the cap gains tax is "more fair."

The guy is an utter disaster waiting to happen and I seriously cannot comprehend how anyone would vote for him. I don't like McCain, but he's leaps better, even Hillary looks appealing in comparison. If you're an average democrat, I think McCain would be FAR more preferable, simply because he's much, much more "moderate" and he'll have a democrat house/senate so it's not like he can pass anything "conservative" anyway.

I thought he was supposed to be a Muslim. It's so hard to keep up with the wingnut circle jerk.

Now it's too bad you didn't write about his responses to the allegations you made in this comment. . . but then I suppose good, "patriotic" Americans prefer spreading innuendo to fact.

If you listened to McCain's anemic speech last night, it would be hard to believe he's a moderate - he flipflops so often that he can't figure out what he believes - and he's had a rather cushy existence at taxpayer's expense through most of his life. I'm not sure what is so "moderate" about him except he isn't as extremely right-wing as the neo-con/American Taliban crowd on a few things. Otherwise, his voting record is pretty much McSame-as-Bush and after half a dozen trips to Iraq one wonders how he still can't figure out the difference between Sunni and Shia. Of course, he likes to talk about all his trips to Baghdad, where taxpayers foot the bill while he is escorted by an large military unit and several helicopters as he strolls through a marketplace declaring it "safer" than American cities. Maybe that's why he rarely ever visits any American towns.

At least he recently discovered New Orleans - but I sure can't remember any visit after Katrina, or any statements from his office about the federal government's reaction to the hurricane when it happened. He's so busy trying to figure out how to kiss right wing butt while appearing moderate that he seems out of touch with himself - and if his delivery last night is any indication of his leadership abilities, Americans will fall asleep five minutes into any speech he makes to the country.

I don't think it will take too long before all of those conservative accusations against McCain which caused him to be thrown under the bus in favor of BUSH come out again from the 2000 primaries. There certainly has to be some reason why Republicans would provide the nation with George W. Bush instead of McSame, and then pass McSame off as the newer, better model eight years later.

Originally Posted by brogers

Obviously your family is a bunch of racists, as anyone who doesn't like Barack Obama is a racist.

I honestly think he's going to get clobbered once the 527 groups start putting out ads related to Jeremiah Wright, Pfelger, his wife, domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, etc. You certainly can judge a man by the company he keeps. Quite simply put, Barack Obama loves Marxist racists. It's really that simple.

He's also the chosen candidate of Hamas and Colombia's Marxist FARC rebels.

Wow. You mean Hamas and the FARC voted in our primaries too? And just look at your laundry list of ads that you are certain will smear the man - typical GOP 'love" for America.

If we can judge a man by the company he keeps, then Republicans have a lot of explaining to do about George Bush and John McSame. McSame sought out his own "spiritual" advisers, favoring some of the nuttiest fruitcakes in the wingnut televangelista empire. And Bush had Pat Robertson on the White House speed dial. So, McSame is pretty much an elitist who dumped his first wife because she got fat, married into a job and money, and spent most of his working life sucking taxpayer benefits and health insurance for himself. He's a favorite with lobbyists - and he's already had to dump five from his campaign, including two which did business with several right-wing dictators.

Yep. . .you can certainly judge a man by the company he keeps.

Originally Posted by DOMS

My family out in California is all Democrat (I'm the black sheep). So when I go home, I spend most of my time hanging out with them and their Dem friends. With a rare exception or two, the have all said that they will not vote for Obama. They won't vote for McCaine either. They said they'd just sit this election out.

When more of Obama's anit-white view comes out, even more white Dems will sit this election out.

So you are still claiming the man must hate the white half of himself?

Originally Posted by min0 lee

If he can do a better job of running this country I could less.
Now if he were to give Blacks preferential treatment or make whites sit in the back of the bus or not let them eat with the whites or start the hanging of whites before a trial.....oh wait, it's done.

Never mind.

Best post of the thread!

Originally Posted by kbm8795

If you listened to McCain's anemic speech last night,

You missed an opportunity here to say McSame again.

Is "John Mcsame" supposed to be a clever quip

I agree by the way that John McCain is not the right choice. On the flip side, Obama's economic policies include dramatically increasing income redistribution and seem eerily socialistic. I powerfully disagree with Obama and the movement that he's rode into the Senate, but at least I know what he believes as a liberal. Where are the constitutionalitists when you need them? This election is looking more and more like a conflict between world-views and McCain is not someone I want fighting this side. What a sad election this will be

Originally Posted by Duncans Donuts

Is "John Mcsame" supposed to be a clever quip

I agree by the way that John McCain is not the right choice. On the flip side, Obama's economic policies include dramatically increasing income redistribution and seem eerily socialistic. I powerfully disagree with Obama and the movement that he's rode into the Senate, but at least I know what he believes as a liberal. Where are the constitutionalitists when you need them? This election is looking more and more like a conflict between world-views and McCain is not someone I want fighting this side. What a sad election this will be

So true.

Originally Posted by busyLivin

You missed an opportunity here to say McSame again.

Thanks for catching that....

Originally Posted by Duncans Donuts

Is "John Mcsame" supposed to be a clever quip

I agree by the way that John McCain is not the right choice. On the flip side, Obama's economic policies include dramatically increasing income redistribution and seem eerily socialistic. I powerfully disagree with Obama and the movement that he's rode into the Senate, but at least I know what he believes as a liberal. Where are the constitutionalitists when you need them? This election is looking more and more like a conflict between world-views and McCain is not someone I want fighting this side. What a sad election this will be

Well, if the middle class is being squeezed, and the poor are getting poorer, what income redistribution was going on during the present Administration?

Originally Posted by kbm8795

Well, if gthe middle class is being squeezed, and the poor are getting poorer, what income redistribution was going on during the present Administration?

First of all, I am not a Bush apologist.

RE: your statement, can you be more specific? Capitalism is a system that rewards productive, ambitious people while those who are neither, suffer. The declaration of independence clearly says we have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. We do not have a right to universal health care.

Income redistribution by the federal government is an example of socialistic economics. When the government takes earnings from citizens and reallocates it (universally controlled health-care would be a dramatic example), we have direct income redistribution. AKA, anti-capitalism. As the government takes over what should be a service or product of the private sector, we all suffer. As the government replaces itself into the private sector, we have a bloated and inefficient consequence. The fatter the government, the more involved it is with every day choices, and the more liberty we surrender.

Just like these "excessive profits" taxes...lol. What the fuck does excessive profits mean? We want to punish the most productive in society? Yeah, this line of thinking will be good for our economy.

Originally Posted by Duncans Donuts

Income redistribution by the federal government is an example of socialistic economics. When the government takes earnings from citizens and reallocates it (universally controlled health-care would be a dramatic example), we have direct income redistribution. AKA, anti-capitalism. As the government takes over what should be a service or product of the private sector, we all suffer. As the government replaces itself into the private sector, we have a bloated and inefficient consequence. The fatter the government, the more involved it is with every day choices, and the more liberty we surrender.

It's this sort of contradiction that I find so amusing about some people. The government is evil, but we want it to run more of our lives.

Originally Posted by Duncans Donuts

First of all, I am not a Bush apologist.

RE: your statement, can you be more specific? Capitalism is a system that rewards productive, ambitious people while those who are neither, suffer. The declaration of independence clearly says we have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. We do not have a right to universal health care.

Income redistribution by the federal government is an example of socialistic economics. When the government takes earnings from citizens and reallocates it (universally controlled health-care would be a dramatic example), we have direct income redistribution. AKA, anti-capitalism. As the government takes over what should be a service or product of the private sector, we all suffer. As the government replaces itself into the private sector, we have a bloated and inefficient consequence. The fatter the government, the more involved it is with every day choices, and the more liberty we surrender.

Just like these "excessive profits" taxes...lol. What the fuck does excessive profits mean? We want to punish the most productive in society? Yeah, this line of thinking will be good for our economy.

It's a bit difficult to attempt explaining an ideology as pure, knowing that in the actual practice it doesn't live up to the ideal. When the government allows the taking of individual earnings by private companies whose only ambition might be a new creative means of assessing a "convenience charge", this isn't rewarding someone for "productivity," unless you define that as scamming the public. The government has had no problem taking the earnings of middle and lower income people and using that money to bail out banks and Wall Street during the current economic crisis, even though some blame must be placed on manipulative practices of some companies.

It just seems increasingly obvious that conservatives view outright theft as merely ambition. Has the number of CEOs receiving record corporate rewards for running a company into the ground increased?

The Declaration of Independence is not the governing document in this country. However, it isn't difficult to argue that good health is certainly a major component promoting happiness. We certainly have no problem providing universal health care to university students or members of the armed forces, so it isn't as if this is some new concept. We don't have any problem providing our government officials with top-notch health care, do we, even though we know they can better afford it on their own? The Republican candidate has spent most of his adult life on the public health care dole.

Many governments provide scholarships and loan discounts to people who go into professions which are short on professionals - particularly health care. Why would the public help finance the expensive education of doctors, specialists, and nurses if the only return they get is declaring bankruptcy for being hospitalized over one illness? Perhaps you believe that those who are beneficiaries of such social programs are both ambitious and productive, and those who paid for that professional development are the "losers" for not seeing they were likely not ever going to be able to afford access to the professionals they paid for training. Then we have the great insurance industry scam - a once noble endeavor which is widely considered little more than a necessary, legislated corporate entitlement program for people to pay as a duty, knowing they are likely never going to collect on a claim. And if they do, they are blackballed from insurance again or controlled by the insurance company's profit-oriented judgement of what medical procedures are allowed.

Original Article

"Sen. Barack Obama employed and continues to employ senior staffers who belong to the Nation of Islam, and the presidential candidate has some "worrying" ties to the controversial group headed by Louis Farrakhan, a former key Obama insider told WND."

That's the same as a white candidate hiring from the Klan. So, white Democrats, that's the man who you'll be voting for if you vote for your party.

Luis Farakhan - Racist Leader of Nation of Islam.

So did this video surface yet or what?

Originally Posted by DOMS

Original Article

"Sen. Barack Obama employed and continues to employ senior staffers who belong to the Nation of Islam, and the presidential candidate has some "worrying" ties to the controversial group headed by Louis Farrakhan, a former key Obama insider told WND."

That's the same as a white candidate hiring from the Klan. So, white Democrats, that's the man who you'll be voting for if you vote for your party.

Luis Farakhan - Racist Leader of Nation of Islam.

WorldNetDaily? Otherwise widely known as the WingNutDaily?

I actually agree with Michelle Malkin on something!!!

Where is the purported Michelle Obama “whitey” video?

By Michelle Malkin • June 3, 2008 04:27 PM
Many readers are wondering why I have not written a single word about the rumored Michelle Obama “whitey” video.
Simple: Larry Johnson, the main source of the rumors, is not, not, not to be trusted.
Moreover: The story keeps changing.
First, the rumor-mongers claimed, Obama appeared on tape with Louis Farrakhan. Now, the rumor is that the tape comes from this event where she appeared with Mrs. Farrakhan at a Rainbow/PUSH conference in 2004


First, the rumor-mongers claimed, she said “whitey” on the tape. Now, the rumor is that she’s saying “why’d he” (referring to George Bush).
First, the rumor-mongers claimed, the “bombshell” would be released on Monday. Then it was yesterday. Now, it’s tomorrow.
So, where’s the stupid tape? Maybe The Spitter should check Al Capone’s vault again:
All sorts of buffoons are hyping the story, the effect of which will be to undermine all legitimate criticism of Michelle Obama.
To all of you who keep bugging me about this subject, please stop sending me e-mail. Until and unless anyone actually produces a video, I’m not going to mention it again.