Reply With QuoteYes,
one of the strategies for those opposing McCain is to link him more with GWB.
McCain is a neo-con, IMO. He's also made a lot of foreign policy statement I don't like. (just MO.)
Also, he's made many gaffs.
I am not saying McCain is dumb, but he's not the sharpest tool in the shed, either.
Poll: Americans Concerned McCain Will Be Too Much Like Bush
Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
07-01-2008, 09:12 AM #1Senior Member ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- The Bronx, NYC
- Posts
- 44,631
- Rep Points
- 702803612
Poll: Americans Concerned McCain Will Be Too Much Like Bush
Poll: Americans Concerned McCain Will Be Too Much Like Bush - America’s Election HQ
As John McCain barnstorms from state to state making his case for the presidency, one obstacle the Arizona senator will be forced to confront if he is to win the White House is voters’ concerns that his policies are too similar to those of President Bush.
According to a recent USA Today/Gallup poll, two in three Americans are worried that McCain will pursue policies that mirror those implemented by Bush. Just about half of those who participated in the survey — 49 percent — said they are “very concerned” that McCain will follow Bush’s initiatives.
McCain must walk a fine line in distancing himself from the president — whose approval ratings are at an all time low — since Bush remains relatively popular among Republican voters. While only 28 percent of Americans approve of the job Bush has done as president, 60 percent of Republicans do, the poll found.
Click here to read the USA Today/Gallup poll.
-
07-01-2008, 07:11 PM #2Windy City ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Chicago
- Posts
- 4,970
- Rep Points
- 103066337
Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first.
Mark Twain
-
07-02-2008, 02:23 PM #3Moderator MODERATOR
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- Elsewhere
- Posts
- 15,179
- Rep Points
- 122054778
That is what I'm worried about. 8 years ago I was ready to vote for McCain, now his policies and ideas have changed drastically. I don't know what Obama's policies will do, and that sucks, but I do know what won't work, and that is what we have done for the last 8 years.
If sense were common, everyone would have it.
4/2007-Current 75th Ranked most popular image 1 spot behind Prince's bulge...
-
07-02-2008, 03:30 PM #4Bohemian Extraordinaire ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Gender
- Location
- Mēns Incognita
- Posts
- 25,581
- Rep Points
- 396412648
Change sounds much better than Stay the Course...
Coarse edged youth, the irish pendants string from their smiles
not yet plucked as to slacken the seams
and drag down the features of age,
no folds or creases from unkempt wear
eyes of tranquilty, crystalline-beads
no sign of despair in their hair, nor their hearts
but oh they have yet to be experienced and that makes aging so very worth it...ML circa2012
-
07-02-2008, 06:18 PM #5__________
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 2,681
- Rep Points
- 4054748
The war is wrapping up, despite the liberals' wishes. The more clear it becomes that the war is ending regardless of who wins in 08, the smaller Obama's chances are. Once that becomes clear, people are simply going to be choosing between high taxes or low taxes.
I don't like McCain, but he is no Bush. He is much more fiscally responsible.________________________
-
07-02-2008, 06:35 PM #6Windy City ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Chicago
- Posts
- 4,970
- Rep Points
- 103066337
Clemson the so-called liberals want the war wrapped up. They've been advocating for the US to leave for years.
Originally Posted by clemson357
You seem to be pigeon-holing a lot.
You use the the term "liberal," but there only a handful of "liberals" in the entire Congress, which is made up of 435 reps.
Taxes? It's not about hight or low taxes.
It's about high taxes, and high taxes.
"low taxes" ended in America at about 1900.Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first.
Mark Twain
-
07-02-2008, 07:37 PM #7Cleaner
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Gender
- Location
- Vostok Antartica
- Posts
- 2,082
- Rep Points
- 17867933
Since Bush will be leaving us fighting in Iran militarily(IMHO) as well as in Afghanistan and in Iraq who do you want? And who should they take on next???
-
07-02-2008, 07:59 PM #8Senior Member ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Gender
- Location
- Connecticut
- Posts
- 3,797
- Rep Points
- 61145583
If we attack anyone how about Saudi Arabia, one of the major sources of Al-Qaida terrorists? Originally Posted by Hoglander
Oh that's right, they're more than willing to sell us their oil and keep it priced in dollars.Ron Paul 2012
No gym for home, work out floor with 30, but is it for 20 like 30 lb when you no lift it to be for men, for 30 lbs instead? or half is 10 for 20 pounds?
-
07-02-2008, 11:53 PM #9Windy City ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Chicago
- Posts
- 4,970
- Rep Points
- 103066337
Two points to address on your above comments Hoglander: Originally Posted by Hoglander
1. It is not 100% that Bush will have us "fighting in Iran military," or attacking at all.
2. If Bush attack Iran, it will be with surgical strikes to knock out and disable nuclear-making facilities.
2b) The American military will not, and cannot enter Iran.
And for the sake of argument, let's say GWB does actually use surgical strikes against Iran, say, after the election but before the next Inauguaration on Jan., 20, 09, it won't matter who is President.
These surgical strikes will be fairly quick. They'll last less than 5-7 days, IMO.
Also:
Iran can easily shut off the Straight of Hormuz, and therefore cut off the oil supply, and the tanker coming in empty and leaving full. The US would have to use its Navy to keep it open.
Iran has the Shihab-3 missle which has pin-point accuracy. They can fire these at US Navy ships, American FOBs and bases in Iraq, and they can reach Israel.
Iran has people monitoring the situation 24/7, with people sitting, with their finger on the fire button.
There will be retaliation, and there will be consequences.
If the US attacks, it will be after the election, and before the inaugeration, IMO.Last edited by Big Smoothy; 07-03-2008 at 12:15 AM.
Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first.
Mark Twain
Similar Threads
-
Americans Oppose Republican Attack on Unions in Poll Divided Over Benefits
By LAM in forum Open ChatReplies: 7Last Post: 03-14-2011, 02:23 AM -
Poll: 4 out of 5 Americans don't trust Washington
By Prince in forum Open ChatReplies: 16Last Post: 04-19-2010, 07:24 PM -
Poll: Few Americans have favorable view of Muslim world
By min0 lee in forum Open ChatReplies: 3Last Post: 06-02-2009, 03:57 PM -
McCain takes on GOP and Bush along with Obama
By min0 lee in forum Open ChatReplies: 0Last Post: 09-07-2008, 06:00 PM -
Poll: Most Americans Love Coulter Columns!
By bigss75 in forum Open ChatReplies: 17Last Post: 03-24-2006, 04:11 PM
Posting Permissions
DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.