A gimmick to entice the young voters?
Perhaps...

By THOMAS M. DeFRANK
DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU CHIEF
Monday, August 11th 2008, 2:26 PM
WASHINGTON - Barack Obama's trailblazing use of the Internet to fuel his campaign has just taken another historic turn: he's offering Web fans instant notice of his vice presidential choice.![]()
Barack Obama will let cell-phone users know his choice of vice presidential candidate by text message. (Click above to see who's on Obama and McCain's VP short list.)
"Barack is about to choose a running mate, and he wants you to know first," campaign manager David Plouffe writes in a new message.
PHOTOS: SEE WHO'S ON THE VP SHORT LIST
"You have helped build this movement from the bottom up, and Barack wants you to be the first to know his choice. Sign up today to be the first to know."
After signing up at my.barackobama.com/vp, "You will receive an email the moment Barack makes his decision, or you can text VP to 62262 to receive a text message on your mobile phone," Plouffe says.
Plouffe's special offer will allow the campaign to expand its campaign's bulging e-mail database. It's not necessary to contribute to get in on this deal, but Plouffe's message does have
a "Donate" button at the bottom.
It's another signal that the candidate, who's vacationing in Hawaii, is close to announcing his Veep choice.
Democratic insiders speculate an announcement will come early next week to dominate news coverage in the final week before the Democratic convention in Denver.

A gimmick to entice the young voters?
Perhaps...


I am betting it'll be Biden.....
Coarse edged youth, the irish pendants string from their smiles
not yet plucked as to slacken the seams
and drag down the features of age,
no folds or creases from unkempt wear
eyes of tranquilty, crystalline-beads
no sign of despair in their hair, nor their hearts
but oh they have yet to be experienced and that makes aging so very worth it...ML circa2012

Well then Obama's people are doing a fine job.
Now if only i can tget Ron Paul to break dance for us...


wow, what a fucking gimmick.
I know plenty of my friends will be all exciting of this.
Anything that will keep us from enduring another four years of Bush is a great gimmick.
OK, Min0,
Maybe now is the time for you to start a thread on who the next VP of both parties will be.
We can even use cyber-cash or something like that.
I think Kaine is a no. He's too inexperienced and has no foreign policy experience.
It's an accurate statement that our current spending will not be increasing the debt We've stopped spending money that we don't have.
-- Jack Lew, then director of the Office of Management and Budget, in Feb. 16, 2011 testimony before the Senate Budget Committee.
BTW.. how is this a "historic turn"?

That's the whole idea, much like when Ross Perot was running for President he had a experianced war veteran as his running mate.That's hilarious! So what! If he's elected, the President won't either!
I will say though that most of these countries right now seem to like Obama.....unlike your boy Bush and Cheney who they all despise.
Very true.. and that usually means something. Could you explain how Socialist Europe's opinion of Americans or it's President has any bearing on me?
See that's the problem.. this isn't a popularity contest. We're talking about the leader of our country. Do me a favor.. find out why they don't like McCain & we'll talk. (I'll give you a hint.. he's not a socialist or a coward).

Sorry, I thought you were a Bush boy.
There are ways a dealing with people without them hating you.
I get away with it all the time, just have know how to sweeten the venom you give out.
In many ways I do still like Bush. He's gone soft lately, but that's because of his unpopularity.
Don't agree with him on a lot, but he kept us safe for 8 years. People often ignore that and/or deny it.. it's a shame. He had a lot to deal with & didn't handle everything well. Easy to criticize him from the cheap seats. The Democrats are the worst offenders, but that's politics: I just wish people saw through them once in a while.
i would really think that what we face today is more difficult than the cold war. how many soldiers died in the cold war? yet during bush's presidency we lost thousands of civilians on US soil. Bush's presidency was much more difficult than reagans in my opinion.
during reagans time we were against the russians and communism as a whole. now everyone is so homosexually politically correct that if someone says we are against the arabs or muslims they throw a fit. it is much easier when you can paint someone as the bad guy.

I have to disagree with you on that, Russia was no joke back then and if we ever went to war with them it would have been very messy. They had more than enough weapons to do some damage to us and they knew how to use them.
Without a doubt they would have attacked US soil.
It's not always about beating the crap out of everyone, it's about using your brains to get out of a fight and get what you want.
You must have been too young to remember.

That itself was a victory.i would really think that what we face today is more difficult than the cold war. how many soldiers died in the cold war?
Need I say more.yet during bush's presidency we lost thousands of civilians on US soil.
during reagans time we were against the russians and communism as a whole. now everyone is so homosexually politically correct that if someone says we are against the arabs or muslims they throw a fit. it is much easier when you can paint someone as the bad guy.[/quote]Nope, go read a little about him. He wasn't perfect but he makes Bush Jr. seem......well Bush.Bush's presidency was much more difficult than reagans in my opinion.
The Arab has always been there, do you remember the Iran hostage situation?
If you look at history, the russians were even more scared of a nuclear war than we were. we also had many back channels for communication with the russians. how many channels of communication do we have with the terrorists? fighting a group that does not have a country is much more difficult scenario. dont give me that too young crap.
beating the crap out of everyone? using your brains to get out of a fight? pray tell all wise one. what should we have done differently to avoid losing civilian lives on american soil? and after that what should we have done to "get what we want" by "using our brains"
The threat level (nuclear war) is greater, but the decisions were more clear cut. (and im not marginalizing the difficulty of decisions our presidents had to make during the cold war) I do not think the decision making process during the last 8 years was in any way easier than the decisions of previous presidents. I believe it was even more difficult.

I always confuse them, still a confrontation.and yet it was against IRAN that we could direct our anger, not Arabs.
I can't blame him, who really knows.tell me, what should bush have done differently to prevent 9-11? do you really blame bush for that?

Don't take that as an insult, I get told the same about the Vietnam War.
In truth I was too young too know about it so when I was told to look into it I didn't take it as an insult.
By the way I overheard these kids mention how this was is worse than the Vietnam War and all I could do was laugh.
you're right. and that is my point. today we are in a confrontation with an enemy we can not identify something to. What flag do the terrorists raise? where do they live? what do they look like?
no flag, all over the world, and if we identify them by what they look like our own people throw a hissy fit.
during the cold war if we dropped a bomb in north korea, or vietnam, or russia we would kill a communist. we knew this. now we are fighting a people whose leaders have declared war on us, yet we are unable to identify until they push a button and blow themselves up? fighting a war with no clear cut enemy is much more difficult than fighting a war (especially a cold one) with a clear cut defined enemy.