IronMagLabs Osta Rx


Obama misleads on Social Security

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER

    min0 lee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,631
    Rep Points
    702803612


    Obama misleads on Social Security



    In the wake of the wild gyrations on the stock market, Barack Obama has been trying to convince retirees that they would be in deep trouble if his Republican rival succeeded in privatizing Social Security. He is telling seniors that John McCain "wants to gamble with your life savings," and claimed that the Republican plan would cut "Social Security benefits in half." His predictions of doom are a gross distortion of McCain's position on Social Security.

    The Facts

    McCain has expressed support for a never-adopted Bush administration proposal to allow Americans to invest a portion of the money that they now pay in payroll taxes in "personal retirement accounts" that would be tied to stock market performance. Participation would have been voluntary. Eligibility would have been limited to future retirees, with a cut-off date of birth dates after 1950.

    As my fellow fact-checkers at Factcheck.org have pointed out, the Bush proposal would not have affected the current generation of retirees. It is therefore wrong for Obama to suggest that "millions of Floridians" who presently rely on Social Security would have seen their retirement nest-egg nosedive as a result of the battering that stocks have taken on Wall Street.

    The Obama campaign has also been unable to produce satisfactory support for its claim, in the YouTube video above, that a McCain administration would slash Social Security benefits by half. According to a study by one of Obama's top economics advisers, Jason Furman, the 2005 Bush proposal would reduce the annual benefits of an average wage-owner who retires in 2045 by about 16 percent, compared with the benefits he is projected to receive under the current system. For the average wage earner who retired in 2075, the reduction would be in the region of 28 percent.

    Under the Bush-McCain plan, Social Security benefits would still rise, but they would be pegged to inflation rather than wages. Click here for a more extensive analysis by Factcheck.org.

    The Pinocchio Test

    Obama has distorted McCain's position on Social Security, just as McCain has twisted Obama's position on taxes. (The McCain camp falsely claims that Obama wants to raise taxes across the board.) As the presidential election campaign enters its final phase, both candidates have resorted to scare tactics and a barrage of misleading, sometimes false, statistics to drum up votes.

  2. #2
    Windy City
    ELITE MEMBER

    Big Smoothy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    4,970
    Rep Points
    103066337


    Social Security is a train crash. There are no viable solutions that I've ever read about by any politician.

    It's still the "3rd rail of politics," for the most part.
    Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first.

    Mark Twain

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-27-2008, 07:05 PM
  2. Social Security unveils new earnings calculator
    By min0 lee in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-23-2008, 05:46 AM
  3. Ron Paul social security
    By min0 lee in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 03-30-2008, 11:56 AM
  4. Social Security
    By min0 lee in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 05-09-2006, 09:04 PM
  5. Social Security sex
    By ZECH in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-07-2002, 03:58 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.