IronMagLabs Osta Rx


President Bush, Nancy Pelosi among biggest losers in bailout debacle

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER
    min0 lee's Avatar


    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,636
    Rep Points
    723720499


    President Bush, Nancy Pelosi among biggest losers in bailout debacle

    President Bush, Nancy Pelosi among biggest losers in bailout debacle

    BY THOMAS M. DEFRANK
    DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU CHIEF

    Tuesday, September 30th 2008, 12:58 AM

    WASHINGTON - The House vote scuttling the financial bailout plan is one of the most stunning debacles of modern times - and a textbook example of why so many Americans hate Washington.



    If House Republican leaders are to be believed, the bill went down because a dozen or so members changed their votes to "no" after partisan remarks by Democratic Speaker Nancy Pelosi offended them. Perhaps, by schoolyard standards, they got even. But stockholders, big and small, finished the day well south of even: The stock market's plunge wiped $1.2 trillion off the books.


    The only major pol who doesn't necessarily come out of the latest mess looking worse is Barack Obama. True, he wasn't a decisive player in the doomed deliberations, but he didn't grandstand, either. Besides, fresh economic jitters usually help Democrats.


    Republicans were already being blamed for the laissez-faire policies that created the mess. Now they're sure to be tarred for killing a bipartisan plan to fix it.



    "The House Republican leadership just got Barack Obama elected," a senior New York Democratic lawmaker predicted.



    A roll call of Monday's political losers:

    - President Bush: Despite a prime-time address to the nation and heavy White House jawboning, two-thirds of House Republicans voted against the leader of their party. Bush has privately told associates the country doesn't listen to him anymore. He showed leadership by pushing hard, but lacks the moral authority to follow through.

    - Pelosi: She delivered more of her Democrats than the opposition, but a tough floor speech gave some Republicans a fig leaf to vote no.

    The speaker also violated a cardinal rule: never bring a crucial bill to the floor unless the votes are there.

    - House Republicans: They retire the pettiness trophy by claiming Pelosi's partisan rhetoric turned them off. "Because somebody hurt their feelings they decide to punish the country?" House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank needled.

    As John McCain might say: "Oh, please!"

    - John McCain: He rushed back to Washington to take charge of the negotiations and whip balking Republicans into line. Oops.

    - John Boehner: Like Bush, the House minority leader's counsel was repudiated by his own side. "These are the votes that separate the men from the boys and the girls from the women," he warned colleagues. They didn't care.

    - Henry Paulson: The secretary of the Treasury is highly respected, but he earned hundreds of millions of dollars as a senior executive at Goldman Sachs. "Main Street resents Wall Street," a senior GOP operative said. "Hank is the wrong frontman to sell this to the average person."

    - Wordsmiths: "Rescue plan" never took hold as a catch phrase for this bill. "Bailout" was all the little guys heard - and their representatives heard from them in droves.

    - Retirees: Don't even open the envelope when the September 401(k) statement arrives. Better to save the paper for kindling.

    With Kenneth R. Bazinet

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER
    busyLivin's Avatar


    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    4,655
    Rep Points
    15203108



    "I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole."

    John McCain, Senate Floor, 5/25/2006

  3. #3
    Registered User


    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,501
    Rep Points
    1567968



    Does anyone care about the truth though? That is the question..

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER
    min0 lee's Avatar


    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,636
    Rep Points
    723720499


    Quote Originally Posted by busyLivin View Post


    "I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole."

    John McCain, Senate Floor, 5/25/2006
    Good find, keep it up.
    +2 for McCain.

    Can't say the same for his people.

    I'm sure Obama situation is the same....let me look.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER
    min0 lee's Avatar


    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,636
    Rep Points
    723720499


    Quote Originally Posted by brogers View Post


    Does anyone care about the truth though? That is the question..
    Of course we do, too bad there's not much of that spread around.

    Let me add that by calling your counterpart an "Idiot" you lose a lot of respect.

    I don't agree with Busy on everything but I do read what he has to say, but he never goes over board.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER
    min0 lee's Avatar


    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,636
    Rep Points
    723720499


    McCain's Fannie and Freddie Connections
    09/10/08 at 1:01 PM



    John McCain railed against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on the campaign trail today, saying that the CEOs that led the lenders to ruin "deserve nothing" and should have to pay back their severance packages. In an Wall Street Journal op-ed co-bylined by his vice presidential pick, Sarah Palin, McCain suggested bold reforms for Fannie and Freddie that would "terminate future lobbying, which was one of the primary contributors to this great debacle."

    If that's the case, McCain should look first to his campaign staffers as the cause of that debacle. One of them was Fannie Mae's head of lobbying, and spread tens of millions of dollars around Washington in the form of lobbying contracts. A number of McCain staffers were on the receiving end of those contracts, collecting hundreds of thousands of dollars each from the lenders to rep their interests. And McCain's campaign manager served as president of a lobbying association that fought to protect Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae from the sort of regulation that McCain is now proposing.

    In McCain's op-ed in the Journal, he and Palin wrote:

    For years, Congress failed to act and it is deeply troubling that what we are seeing is an exercise in crisis management rather than sound planning, and at great cost to taxpayers.
    We promise the American people that our administration will be different. We have long records of standing up to special interests…
    But McCain's own campaign staffers are those special interests, a fact that casts doubt on both McCain's hiring judgment and his ability to pursue tough reforms of Fannie and Freddie.

    Aquiles Suarez, listed as an economic adviser to the McCain campaign in a July 2007 McCain press release, was formerly the director of government and industry relations for Fannie Mae. The Senate Lobbying Database says Suarez oversaw the lending giant's $47,510,000 lobbying campaign from 2003 to 2006.

    And other current McCain campaign staffers were the lobbyists receiving shares of that money. According to the Senate Lobbying Database, the lobbying firm of Charlie Black, one of McCain's top aides, made at least $820,000 working for Freddie Mac from 1999 to 2004. The McCain campaign's vice-chair Wayne Berman and its congressional liaison John Green made $1.14 million working on behalf of Fannie Mae for lobbying firm Ogilvy Government Relations. Green made an additional $180,000 from Freddie Mac. Arther B. Culvahouse Jr., the VP vetter who helped John McCain select Sarah Palin, earned $80,000 from Fannie Mae in 2003 and 2004, while working for lobbying and law firm O'Melveny & Myers LLP. In addition, Politico reports that at least 20 McCain fundraisers have lobbied for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, pocketing at least $12.3 million over the last nine years.

    For years McCain campaign manager Rick Davis was head of the Homeownership Alliance, a lobbying association that included Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, real estate agents, homebuilders, and non-profits. According to Politico, the organization opposed congressional attempts at regulation of Fannie and Freddie, along the lines of what John McCain is currently proposing. In his capacity of president of the group, Davis went on record in 2003 and insisted that no further reform of the lenders was necessary, in contradiction to his current boss's sentiments. "[Fannie and Freddie] are subject to an innovative and stringent risk-based capital stress test," Davis wrote. "The toughest in the financial services industry."

    At a campaign rally Wednesday morning in Fairfax, Virginia, John McCain said that the heads of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ought to give back the millions of dollars they've earned. What about the lobbyists who helped Fannie and Freddie game the system? Maybe McCain can ask them — at the next campaign strategy meeting.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER
    min0 lee's Avatar


    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,636
    Rep Points
    723720499


    Barack Obama's Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Connection

    Tuesday , September 16, 2008

    By John Gibson


    Lehman Brothers collapse is traced back to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two big mortgage banks that got a federal bailout a few weeks ago.

    Freddie and Fannie used huge lobbying budgets and political contributions to keep regulators off their backs.

    A group called the Center for Responsive Politics keeps track of which politicians get Fannie and Freddie political contributions. The top three U.S. senators getting big Fannie and Freddie political bucks were Democrats and No. 2 is Sen. Barack Obama.

    Now remember, he's only been in the Senate four years, but he still managed to grab the No. 2 spot ahead of John Kerry — decades in the Senate — and Chris Dodd, who is chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.

    Fannie and Freddie have been creations of the congressional Democrats and the Clinton White House, designed to make mortgages available to more people and, as it turns out, some people who couldn't afford them.

    Fannie and Freddie have also been places for big Washington Democrats to go to work in the semi-private sector and pocket millions. The Clinton administration's White House Budget Director Franklin Raines ran Fannie and collected $50 million. Jamie Gorelick — Clinton Justice Department official — worked for Fannie and took home $26 million. Big Democrat Jim Johnson, recently on Obama's VP search committee, has hauled in millions from his Fannie Mae CEO job.

    Now remember: Obama's ads and stump speeches attack McCain and Republican policies for the current financial turmoil. It is demonstrably not Republican policy and worse, it appears the man attacking McCain — Sen. Obama — was at the head of the line when the piggies lined up at the Fannie and Freddie trough for campaign bucks.

    Sen. Barack Obama: No. 2 on the Fannie/Freddie list of favored politicians after just four short years in the Senate.

    Next time you see that ad, you might notice he fails to mention that part of the Fannie and Freddie problem.

  8. #8
    Registered User


    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,501
    Rep Points
    1567968

    Don't forget that the original "bailout bill" directed 20%, not back to the taxpayers, but to ACORN (which Obama has connections with) and similar organizations to promote "affordable housing."

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER
    min0 lee's Avatar


    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,636
    Rep Points
    723720499


    - Retirees: Don't even open the envelope when the September 401(k) statement arrives. Better to save the paper for kindling.
    Ouch.

    So many of my Co-workers took a hit.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER
    busyLivin's Avatar


    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    4,655
    Rep Points
    15203108

    Quote Originally Posted by min0 lee View Post
    Ouch.

    So many of my Co-workers took a hit.
    I took a little hit.. around 1000-1500. That's nothing compared to what I've heard.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER
    min0 lee's Avatar


    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,636
    Rep Points
    723720499


    Quote Originally Posted by busyLivin View Post
    I took a little hit.. around 1000-1500. That's nothing compared to what I've heard.
    Same here.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER
    busyLivin's Avatar


    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    4,655
    Rep Points
    15203108

    Quote Originally Posted by min0 lee View Post
    I don't agree with Busy on everything
    One day you will.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    ELITE MEMBER
    min0 lee's Avatar


    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Bronx, NYC
    Posts
    44,636
    Rep Points
    723720499


    Quote Originally Posted by brogers View Post


    Does anyone care about the truth though? That is the question..
    Highlights of this eight-minute video:

    Maxine Waters: Through nearly a dozen hearings, we were frankly trying to fix something that wasn’t broke. Mr. Chairman, we do not have a crisis at Freddie Mac, and particularly at Fannie Mae, under the outstanding leadership of Franklin Raines. [Raines would barely avoid prosecution for fraud.]

    Gregory Meeks: … I’m just pissed off at OFHEO [the regulators trying to warn Congress of insolvency at the GSEs], because if it wasn’t for you, I don’t think we’d be here in the first place. … There’s been nothing that indicated that’s wrong with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac has come up on its own … The question that then comes up is the competence that your agency has with reference to deciding and regulating these GSEs.

    Lacy Clay: This hearing is about the political lynching of Franklin Raines.

    Barney Frank: I don’t see anything in this report that raises safety and soundness problems.

    Take a good look through this video in 2004, and ask yourself who on this panel wanted more regulatory oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and which members spent their time attacking the regulators. When Barack Obama talks at debates about how the past eight years of regulatory laissez-faire created the problem, he may want to review the transcripts of these hearings and note that Democrats repeatedly undermined regulators and called them everything from incompetent to bigoted in their rush to keep the status quo at Fannie and Freddie.

    In 2005, Fortune published a lengthy anaylsis of the impending crash of Fannie Mae, and included this altercation between OFHEO and Congress:

    Two weeks later Falcon and Raines faced off against each other in a hearing before the House subcommittee on capital markets, which was chaired by Baker. Consider the circumstances. Falcon was Fannie’s regulator and had leveled serious charges, amounting to fraud, against Fannie Mae. Most CEOs would have seen the wisdom of humility at this point, but Raines showed little. “These accounting standards are highly complex and require determinations on which experts often disagree,” he said, adding that “there were no facts” that supported OFHEO’s charge that Fannie executives had deferred an expense in 1998 to earn bonuses.

    And most of the Democrats present agreed with him. “This hearing is about the political lynching of Franklin Raines,” said Congressman William Lacy Clay of Missouri. Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank said, “I see nothing in here that suggests that safety and soundness are an issue.” Other Democrats complained that the mere fact of releasing the report could increase the cost of home-ownership.

    “Is it possible that by casting all of these aspersions … you potentially are weakening this institution in the market, that you are potentially weakening the housing market in this country?” Congressman Artur Davis of Alabama demanded. When Falcon tried to answer, Davis acted like a prosecutor grilling a hostile witness. He wanted a one-word answer: yes or no. “Is that possible?” he asked again.

    “I have never seen anyone treated as disrespectfully as Armando Falcon was by the Democrats and by Franklin Raines,” recalls one congressional aide. Adds Andrew Cuomo: “I credit him for not folding and not caving and not running, because he took a tremendous beating.”

    Unfortunately for the Democrats at this hearing, Raines then doubled down and demanded that the SEC give a second opinion on his business practices. After an investigation, the SEC agreed with Falcon and demanded that Fannie Mae restate its earnings all the way back to 2001 — at which point Raines’ fraud got uncovered. OFHEO had been correct, and the Democrats in this committee meeting had done their level best to interfere with the regulator to cover up for Raines’ fraud.

    The Democrats attacking the regulator here didn’t do so out of some deep conviction against government regulation. They wanted to keep the gravy train rolling on questionable mortgages in order to endear themselves to the working class, and didn’t mind smearing the OFHEO regulator as a racist in order to succeed. The Republicans who wanted more oversight didn’t demand it as socialists looking for a government takeover of the financial sector, either, but because they saw the impending disaster looming for Fannie Mae.

    Democrats distorted the market through the CRA and through Fannie and Freddie’s massive securitizing of bad debt, and then blocked regulators from doing their jobs. That’s the real story of this collapse.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 12-04-2008, 06:50 PM
  2. Bush signs bailout bill
    By min0 lee in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-06-2008, 07:09 AM
  3. Should President Bush Be Impeached?
    By TJ Cline in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 05-14-2006, 09:30 PM
  4. President Bush
    By min0 lee in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 353
    Last Post: 12-23-2005, 09:44 PM
  5. Replies: 137
    Last Post: 11-15-2005, 08:14 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73