By MICHAEL LUO
Much was made in 2004 of the so-called “God gap” between Republicans and Democrats, becoming part of the conventional wisdom explaining President Bush’s victory over Senator John F. Kerry.
As a result, the Democratic Party, including Senator Barack Obama, focused heavily on outreach to religious voters, including white evangelicals who voted overwhelmingly for President Bush, and talked more openly than ever before about faith.
So did all the God-talk pay off?
The verdict appears to be mixed, but Mr. Obama does appear to have scored some significant victories, especially among Roman Catholics, according to nationwide surveys of voters leaving the polls on Tuesday and telephone interviews of some people who had voted early.
One striking difference this year compared with 2004 was Mr. Obama’s gain among those who attend church (or a synagogue or mosque) more than weekly. Mr. Obama won 43 percent of them, Mr. McCain 55 percent. The group accounted for 12 percent of the electorate. In 2004, the group represented 16 percent of the electorate, with Mr. Kerry claiming only 35 percent to President Bush’s 64 percent.
The difference with 2004 in the vote of those who attend a house of worship weekly was not as dramatic. They accounted for 27 percent of voters, with Mr. Obama winning 43 percent and Mr. McCain 55 percent. In 2004, they represented 26 percent of the electorate, with Mr. Kerry getting 41 percent and Mr. Bush 58 percent.
While the Democrats put enormous focus on peeling away white evangelical Protestants from the Republican base, Mr. McCain, who has had at times a tense relationship with the group, still took 73 percent of that vote, compared with Mr. Obama’s 26 percent. They accounted for nearly a quarter of the electorate, just as in 2004, when President Bush won a whopping 78 percent of their votes, with Mr. Kerry getting only 21 percent.
Notably, Mr. Obama failed to do even as well as former Vice President Al Gore in 2000, when he ran against then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush. Mr. Gore won 30 percent of that vote that year and Mr. Bush won 68 percent.
On the other end of the religious spectrum, Mr. Obama won 67 percent of those who never attend church, while 30 percent of those voters went for Mr. McCain. The group represented 16 percent of voters. In 2004, Mr. Kerry beat Mr. Bush 62 percent to 36 percent in that group, which accounted for 15 percent of the electorate.
But religious experts said the swing in the Catholic vote may be one of the more significant political developments, despite the emphasis that Democrats have put on attracting evangelical voters. Although Mr. Kerry is Catholic, he won only 47 percent of Catholic voters, while President Bush drew 52 percent. That represented a reversal from 2000 when Mr. Gore won 50 percent of Catholics and Mr. Bush won 47 percent.
On Tuesday, Catholics, who accounted for about a quarter of the electorate, supported Mr. Obama, at 54 percent, over Mr. McCain, at 45 percent.
DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.