hmmm. i remember reading once about a pedophile that won a case where he was writing pornographic stories for himself involving children. it supposedly kept him from offending and he won the right to do it.
anyone recall that case?


Children sex acts based on The Simpsons are ruled pornographic | Herald Sun
CARTOONS showing sex acts involving children modelled on characters from The Simpsons are pornographic, a judge ruled today.
In the NSW Supreme Court today, Justice Michael Adams ruled a fictional cartoon character was a "person" within the meaning of the relevant state and Commonwealth laws.
In February, Alan John McEwan was convicted in Parramatta Local Court of possessing child pornography and using his computer to access child pornography.
"The alleged pornography comprised a series of cartoons depicting figures modelled on members of the television animated series The Simpsons," the judge said.
The cartoons showed characters such as Bart, Lisa and Maggie Simpson having sex.
The man was convicted and fined $3,000 and placed on a good behaviour bond.
"In my view, the magistrate was correct in determining that, in respect of both the Commonwealth and the NSW offences, the word 'person' included fictional or imaginary characters ...," the judge said.
"... the mere fact that the figure depicted departed from a realistic representation in some respects of a human being did not mean that such a figure was not a 'person'."
In dismissing the appeal, the judge ordered each party to pay its own legal costs as this was the first case dealing with this "difficult" issue.


hmmm. i remember reading once about a pedophile that won a case where he was writing pornographic stories for himself involving children. it supposedly kept him from offending and he won the right to do it.
anyone recall that case?
Don't look back ~ You're not going that way!


there's so much bullshit that could come of this ruling. Vladimir Nabokov go directly to jail do not pass go...
Neil Gaiman's Journal
The first time I ever came close actually to sending a publisher to prison for something I had written was about 1986 or 1987, for Knockabout's Outrageous Tales From The Old Testament: I'd retold a story from the Book of Judges that contained a rape and murder, and this was held to have contravened a Swedish law depicting images of violence against women. The case was only won when the defense pointed out that the words were from the King James version of the bible, and that the images were a fair representation thereof...
(For those of you who are a bit shaky on your Book of Judges, here's an online Bible version of the scene that caused the prosecution.
While they were enjoying themselves, some of the wicked men of the city surrounded the house. Pounding on the door, they shouted to the old man who owned the house, "Bring out the man who came to your house so we can have sex with him."
The owner of the house went outside and said to them, "No, my friends, don't be so vile. Since this man is my guest, don't do this disgraceful thing. Look, here is my virgin daughter, and his concubine. I will bring them out to you now, and you can use them and do to them whatever you wish. But to this man, don't do such a disgraceful thing."
But the men would not listen to him. So the man took his concubine and sent her outside to them, and they raped her and abused her throughout the night, and at dawn they let her go. At daybreak the woman went back to the house where her master was staying, fell down at the door and lay there until daylight.
When her master got up in the morning and opened the door of the house and stepped out to continue on his way, there lay his concubine, fallen in the doorway of the house, with her hands on the threshold. He said to her, "Get up; let's go." But there was no answer. Then the man put her on his donkey and set out for home.
When he reached home, he took a knife and cut up his concubine, limb by limb, into twelve parts and sent them into all the areas of Israel.)
Don't look back ~ You're not going that way!
South park?
those picks are nasteeey!
You've never lived untill you've almost died, life has an excitement that the protected will never know.
Even I don't get the thing behind Simpsons porn. It's funny though cuz it was within the past couple days I saw a site that had taken in pages worth of Simpsons pics and I wondered who the hell is still into Simpsons at all, much less porny Simpsons. I guess the art style is just so easily imitated and requires so little artistic ability that it's an easy target for amateur cartoon porn.
oh, also...
![]()
DISCLAIMER: