THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Updated Tuesday, March 17th 2009, 8:30 AM
ABOARD THE PAPAL PLANE — Pope Benedict XVI said Tuesday that the distribution of condoms is not the answer in the fight against AIDS in Africa.
Benedict has never before spoken explicitly on condom use although he has stressed that the Roman Catholic Church is in the forefront of the battle against AIDS. The Vatican encourages sexual abstinence to fight the spread of the disease.
"You can't resolve it with the distribution of condoms," the pope told reporters aboard the Alitalia plane headed to Yaounde, Cameroon. "On the contrary, it increases the problem."
Some priests and nuns working with victims of the AIDS pandemic ravaging Africa question the church's opposition to condoms.
The pope also said that he intends to make an appeal for "international solidarity" for Africa in the face of the global economic downturn.
He said that while the church does not propose specific economic solutions, it can give "spiritual and moral" suggestions.
Describing the current crisis as the consequence of "a deficit of ethics in economic structures," the pope said, "It is here that the church can make a contribution."
Benedict's seven-day pilgrimage will take him to Cameroon and Angola.
Africa is the fastest-growing region for the Roman Catholic Church.
I really don't understand the big deal to this. Catholics are only to have sex with a spouse. That has always been their stance. They have always preached abstinence.
Whether it's realistic or not isn't the point. Does anyone really expect the Vatican to come out & approve guidelines for what to do while you are breaking one of the churches laws?
Personally I really hope the church doesn't "adapt" to today's values.
Getting back to the article above I think he's out of touch with the problem Africa has with AIDS, do you really think they will practice abstinence?
My bet is that they will prefer to use a condom and getting laid over not getting laid.
They aren't going to practice abstinence in Africa... they aren't going to use condoms either. In parts of Africa, you are considered less of a man if you use one and there is a myth that unprotected sex with a virgin can cure your AIDS... the continent is messed up and they aren't ready for condoms or abstinence
It's not an argument it's a reality.
Do I like it?
No.
That's not my point. I know it's not realistic to expect abstinence, but do you really expect the Pope, the head of a world religion, to say "You shouldn't sin, but since I know you're going to, sin this way."
That's like saying "You shouldn't kill, but since murders are going to happen, Catholic murderers should shoot their victims in the head so there is no pain."
That's not my point. I know it's not realistic to expect abstinence, but do you really expect the Pope, the head of a world religion, to say "You shouldn't sin, but since I know you're going to, sin this way."
Yes, if he did I think he wouldn't look so out of touch with reality.
Face it, what kid today listens to the Pope?
That's like saying "You shouldn't kill, but since murders are going to happen, Catholic murderers should shoot their victims in the head so there is no pain."
They aren't going to practice abstinence in Africa... they aren't going to use condoms either. In parts of Africa, you are considered less of a man if you use one and there is a myth that unprotected sex with a virgin can cure your AIDS... the continent is messed up and they aren't ready for condoms or abstinence
That's not my point. I know it's not realistic to expect abstinence, but do you really expect the Pope, the head of a world religion, to say "You shouldn't sin, but since I know you're going to, sin this way."
That's like saying "You shouldn't kill, but since murders are going to happen, Catholic murderers should shoot their victims in the head so there is no pain."
No.. he would just say don't kill.
How about someone who is meant to be an authority figure and a world leader to place health above his other out dated agenda?
If even 1 life could be saved due to the use of condoms then he should be advocating there use. The fact that he hides behind church principles is sad, if thats what he truly believes then its worrying.
How about someone who is meant to be an authority figure and a world leader to place health above his other out dated agenda?
If even 1 life could be saved due to the use of condoms then he should be advocating there use. The fact that he hides behind church principles is sad, if thats what he truly believes then its worrying.
Outdated agenda? Sex is a choice... we are not animals.
I can't think of another way to say what I've already said, but the ignorance you have is pretty thick... "hiding behind church principles"? What the hell does that even mean? The pope isn't letting people die. They are having sex with multiple partners out of wedlock & spreading a disease. The pope goes to the root of the problem that is "outdated" & now he's responsible for their deaths because he won't approve condoms.. something that works 80% of the time?
Outdated agenda? Sex is a choice... we are not animals.
I can't think of another way to say what I've already said, but the ignorance you have is pretty thick... "hiding behind church principles"? What the hell does that even mean? The pope isn't letting people die. They are having sex with multiple partners out of wedlock & spreading a disease. The pope goes to the root of the problem that is "outdated" & now he's responsible for their deaths because he won't approve condoms.. something that works 80% of the time?
What do you mean 80% of the time? They are 98% effect when used correctly, and thats against pregnancy, they are even more effective at stopping STI transmission.
Sex is an evolutionary requirement, they are doing what they are hardwired to do. They are an LEDC and do not possess the knowledge that we do about STI's and safe sex. They still have many myths about the use of condoms within their culture and have been given mis-information about the cause of HIV over the years by their governments. They need to be taught about safe sex and how to prevent STI's. However Africa have around 60% of the worlds infected population, couple this with widespread TB and something needs to be done to bring this number down in the short term. Condom use is the answer, not abstinence.
Every thing Busy has said seems logical to me. The Pope's not the minister of health, do you think the head of Islam is going to recommend Pork as the other white meat?
If sense were common, everyone would have it.
4/2007-Current 75th Ranked most popular image 1 spot behind Prince's bulge...
Every thing Busy has said seems logical to me. The Pope's not the minister of health, do you think the head of Islam is going to recommend Pork as the other white meat?
Originally Posted by busyLivin
That ought to convince the Pope.
Originally Posted by busyLivin
Exactly. The Pope isn't a sex-ed teacher, he's a spiritual leader.
The Pope is an idiot who has no relevance in the modern world.
Comparing pork consumption to the AIDS epidemic(that has killed MILLIONS!!)?
Anyway both you guys did a good job at ignoring the second half of my post, you know the bit filled with facts and sound reasoning. Shit wait, I forgot religion was involved, sure as hell no room facts and sound reasoning in there.
You're looking for soundbites on me! I know you know what I mean but you're twisting it!
I was responding to Moondogg going on about how the pope should be educating all of Africa about sex.
He doesnt want to educate people about safe sex, I dont give a shit. But dont go around telling people not to use condoms.
However saying that condoms arnt the answer to stopping the spread of AIDS is like saying that seatbelts dont save lives. Sure in the long term we introduce speed limits, increased policing, better driving instruction, clamp down on drink driving ect.(equivalent of sex education in Africa) but the short term answer is to wear a seatbelt(condom). The popes sugestion of abstinence is like telling people not to drive, sure its the safest option, but its not pratical in the real world and its not going to happen.
AIDS is like saying that seatbelts dont save lives. Sure in the long term we introduce speed limits, increased policing, better driving instruction, clamp down on drink driving ect.(equivalent of sex education in Africa) but the short term answer is to wear a seatbelt(condom). The popes sugestion of abstinence is like telling people not to drive, sure its the safest option, but its not pratical in the real world and its not going to happen.
The pope should shut the fuck up. To say that condoms aren't the absolute solution so we shouldn't promote their use in Africa IS FUCKING ABSURD. It helps, and is a solution, and they should be promoted.
Now I don't expect the Catholic church to condone the use of condoms. But to speak outright against their use in Africa in the midst of an AIDS epidemic IS FUCKING OUTRAGEOUS. Back to my first point: the pope does not have to condone their usage, he just has to shut the fuck up entirely on the subject.
He should get back to work on dying, which is why he was even appointed in the first place: to die quickly. Fucking douchebag.
The pope should shut the fuck up. To say that condoms aren't the absolute solution so we shouldn't promote their use in Africa IS FUCKING ABSURD. It helps, and is a solution, and they should be promoted.
Now I don't expect the Catholic church to condone the use of condoms. But to speak outright against their use in Africa in the midst of an AIDS epidemic IS FUCKING OUTRAGEOUS. Back to my first point: the pope does not have to condone their usage, he just has to shut the fuck up entirely on the subject.
He should get back to work on dying, which is why he was even appointed in the first place: to die quickly. Fucking douchebag.