Reply With QuoteIve been researchin a lot in this area. It seems that some things get more confusing with the more information you get!lol
I do know that yes HGH must be run for a long time to see benefits and that these new peptides are supposed to be cheaper, more efficient, and dont need to be run as long. I know thats very vague!!!!!lol Personally I will be trying the cjc-1295 alone and will post how it goes. Might start tonight...
still trying to understand all this? (gh related peptides in particular)
Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
05-11-2011, 09:58 AM #1Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Gender
- Location
- by the beach
- Posts
- 577
- Rep Points
- 12230922
still trying to understand all this? (gh related peptides in particular)
So, from what I've gathered ghrp's, ghrh, and cjc's all stimulate your body to produce more gh?
When using these peptides, is there the potential to shutdown your body's natural ability to produce gh similar to AAS, or would these be most comparable to a "test booster" but for gh???
Also, from my understanding HGH needs to be taken for the long run to really maximize it's benifits... is this the case with these peptides?
I am still considering trying "something" as I go into my pct soon...I'm in a cutting phase and currently taking an ECA stack as well. I can't justify running any peptides without a better understanding of them, but it seems like there must be a lot more unknowns in the peptide world when compared to AAS...
-
05-12-2011, 10:58 AM #2Senior Member ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Gender
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 1,931
- Rep Points
- 68313973
-
05-12-2011, 03:02 PM #3Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
- Location
- like i would let you know that
- Posts
- 353
- Rep Points
- 9141528
you should stack with a ghrp. if you where going to take one or the other (ghrh/ghrp) you should have went with a ghrp peptide studies i found
-
05-12-2011, 03:06 PM #4Senior Member ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Gender
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 1,931
- Rep Points
- 68313973
I was told the exact opposite of this. if running one or the other then run ghrh. hmm
Originally Posted by tjsulli
-
05-12-2011, 03:25 PM #5Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
- Location
- like i would let you know that
- Posts
- 353
- Rep Points
- 9141528
i can say that have run ghrp-6 alone with good results. now iam running cjc1295/ghrp-6 combo only one week in so its kind of hard to tell at this point running a ghrp solo and running the two together Originally Posted by yerg
Last edited by tjsulli; 05-12-2011 at 03:33 PM.
-
05-13-2011, 09:57 AM #6Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Gender
- Location
- by the beach
- Posts
- 577
- Rep Points
- 12230922
yerg,
how are you planning on dosing that? are you pinning sub-q?
-
05-13-2011, 07:22 PM #7Senior Member ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Gender
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 1,931
- Rep Points
- 68313973
Sub-Q 3x a day 150mcg AM,PW,PM Originally Posted by DaBeast25
-
05-16-2011, 01:58 PM #8Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Gender
- Location
- K Pak
- Posts
- 288
- Rep Points
- 15514009
By who? Originally Posted by yerg
GHRP's builds the peaks, GHRH builds the troughs between the peaks AND the peaks when used in conjunction with a GHRP.
I have not heard of anyone using a GHRH by itself since it releases less than 1 iu of GH on it's own. Originally Posted by sassy69
Similar Threads
-
99% of the ppl at the gym dont understand me
By gymrat09091974 in forum Open ChatReplies: 32Last Post: 08-29-2011, 06:29 PM -
Here's another I don't understand
By Tough Old Man in forum Diet & NutritionReplies: 9Last Post: 06-08-2005, 09:41 PM -
Letīs see if I understand this..
By Vieope in forum Open ChatReplies: 33Last Post: 04-20-2005, 09:54 AM -
Ok Now I Understand
By Tough Old Man in forum Anabolic ZoneReplies: 2Last Post: 11-02-2004, 06:20 AM -
I really don't understand women....
By Pitboss in forum Open ChatReplies: 58Last Post: 05-19-2004, 09:16 PM
Posting Permissions
DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.