Thread: GHRP-6 + CJC-1295 combo

Im going on 4 weeks of ghrp6 and cjc1295 w/o dac. With cjc 2mg mixed with 1cc of BW and ghrp6 5mg mixed with 2.5 cc of BW, have been doing 3 shots of 100mcg a day about 3-5 tics on a 100 iu syringe

No noticeable effects yet cept increased hunger and amazing sleep

What are you goals? To cut with or the Bulk with?

the goals you are tying to obtain is a GH pulse, 30min after your injection your GH will Pulse at the highest level then start to decline over the course of a few hours.

When used to cut, it will induce the release of FFA's in the blood stream that can be utilized as a source of energy, and to be burned, mimicking the effects of Synthetic GH and its lypolis (sp) properties.

Originally Posted by OldSchoolLifter

What are you goals? To cut with or the Bulk with?

the goals you are tying to obtain is a GH pulse, 30min after your injection your GH will Pulse at the highest level then start to decline over the course of a few hours.

When used to cut, it will induce the release of FFA's in the blood stream that can be utilized as a source of energy, and to be burned, mimicking the effects of Synthetic GH and its lypolis (sp) properties.

goals are for gaining muscle but I will not be running any other anabolics while running the combo

I believe the dosing schedule is different if you're trying to cut. GMO is running a log on GHRP-6 and CJC 1293. He loves it.

What are the differences between 1293 and 1295?

Originally Posted by Livebig14

goals are for gaining muscle but I will not be running any other anabolics while running the combo

That is perfectly Fine,

Dosing schedule should be something like this to start: for the first couple weeks, then depending on how you feel you can add the 3rd dose like outlines.

To start : Dose it Post W/O @ 100mcg Ghrp-6 & 100mcg Modified-GRF(1-29) Eat within 15 minuetes after dosing, to utilize the highest point the GH release, to shuttle the nutrients to the skeletal muscles. Do not eat any fats and limit carbohydrates for at least the first hour after dose, As these will blunt the release of GH, Protein however does not, so increase your Protein intake to utilize its Protein synthesis effects.

Next dose will be Pre Bed @ 100mcg of each again, with No Carbs, and No fats, and high protien. Your sleep, and recovery will be greatly improved, as well as collagen synthesis will be amplified, resulting in soft tissue and joint repair.

After a week of following this protocol. The add a Morning ( fast ) dose of 100mcg of each, followed by again High protien, Low carbs, and no fast within the first hour.

Your AM dose (fasted) will basically just take the surplus calories from the day before that were stored for fat and release them. Then, in the time between your dose and first meal your body will use the now released FFA's (That were stored the day before) and mobilize them.

So essentially you are able to be in caloric surplus but keeping the surplus calories from being stored as fat, and if they are, your next morning dose will take care of them before starting the next day (dietary wise).

Originally Posted by SloppyJ

I believe the dosing schedule is different if you're trying to cut. GMO is running a log on GHRP-6 and CJC 1293. He loves it.

What are the differences between 1293 and 1295?

I cant start this debate, CJC 1293 is Just GRF-(1-29) where as CJC-1295 W/O dac is Modified GRF (1-29)

1293 = Sermorelin or GRF(1-29) w/ a D-alanine at the 2nd position + a lysine.

1295 W/O Dac = Modified GRF(1-29) = Sermorelin or GRF(1-29) w/ a D-alanine at the 2nd position and 3 additional modifications w/ no added lysine and no drug.

Now most of the peptides companies really need to have a label that says Mod-grf(1-29) as CJC W/O dac is still technically not mod-Grf(1-29) but becasue the average user sees it as 1295 w/o dac it is still labeled that way to avoid confusion, but it reall is Real Mod-GRF(1-29) what you want.

Now keep in mind, I prefer GHRP-2, becasue while yes it wont increase huger to the point that GHRP-6 will do, it has been proven time and time again, to significantly up the GH release during your pulse as compared to GHRP-6.

GHRP-6 = first generation GHRP ( Growth Hormone ReleasingPeptide )
GHRP-2 = Second Generation and more advanced GHRP

Thank you for that! It helps a lot. Little confused though. Earlier in the post you say "1295 W/O Dac = Modified GRF(1-29)".

And then later you say "CJC W/O dac is still technically not mod-Grf(1-29)"

Did I miss something?

Good to know about the GHRP's too! Thanks OS.

Originally Posted by SloppyJ

Thank you for that! It helps a lot. Little confused though. Earlier in the post you say "1295 W/O Dac = Modified GRF(1-29)".

And then later you say "CJC W/O dac is still technically not mod-Grf(1-29)"

Did I miss something?

No your right, that is why it is confusing, See Technically and scientifically speaking, CJC 1295 W/O dac is really just CJC-1295 it is NOT Modified GRF(1-29) even if you removed the DAC (a drug). You would still need to remove the extra lysine and terminate the peptide chain properly.

CJC-1295 is a drug + peptide hybrid. The drug (DAC) is not simply attached to the peptide portion, there needs to be an extra lysine added. So removing the DAC and calling it CJC-1295 w/o DAC still does not = Modified GRF(1-29).

BUT becasue of the mass marketing claiming CJC-1295 W/O dac is indeed Modified GRF(1-29), the banner add suppliers, are indeed getting Pure Modified GRH-(1-29) but the label claims CJC W/O Dac to appeal more to the people who believe cjc w/o dac is Mod-GRF(1-29)

LOL

Modified GRF(1-29) is a pure peptide. It is very close to the active portion of the native hormone GHRH (Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone). GHRH is what you body makes and uses to trigger GH (Growth Hormone release). It is changed (or modified by replacing 4 amino acids in the chain with more resilient ones) to become Modified GRF(1-29). Thats it. Forget everything with a CJC in the title. Forget everything with the term DAC. But that does not mean, places like EP that say CJC W/O Dac is indeed Mod-GRF(1-29) is fake, it really is not, but the masses believe otherwise so they must appeal to that.

I got ya! What you're saying is that by just removing the DAC it's not the same as Mod-GRF because of the extra lysine so the structure of the compound has actually been changed. But they market it that way because it is just that, 1295 minus the DAC.

So is there really such a thing as CJC-1295 W/O DAC that still has the lysine attached?

Sorry for the OP, it's getting kinda technical up in herrrr.

Originally Posted by SloppyJ

I got ya! What you're saying is that by just removing the DAC it's not the same as Mod-GRF because of the extra lysine so the structure of the compound has actually been changed. But they market it that way because it is just that, 1295 minus the DAC.

So is there really such a thing as CJC-1295 W/O DAC that still has the lysine attached?

Sorry for the OP, it's getting kinda technical up in herrrr.

they market it that way, becasue most have come to know that Mod-Grf(1-29) is CJC 1295 W/O dac due to bad information. So they have run with it.

Depending on the supplier, I have confirmed though that even though EP says CJC 1295 W/O dac it really is Mod-Grf(1-29) just label says other wise.

and to your question, about is there really a such thing, No