Pats may be best ever

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 32 of 32
  1. #31
    Moderator
    MODERATOR

    Dale Mabry's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Elsewhere
    Posts
    15,179
    Rep Points
    122054778


    Quote Originally Posted by Iceman
    Dale, you don't believe for a second the game was tougher back then???? Are you kidding??? Do you own a TV or watch the games??? You can barely blow air on a wide receiver now. back then, you basically beat the crap out of each other while looking for the ball. Hands to the face was polite, better than the groin. The game was 100 percent tougher. You are confusing toughness with strength. Big mistake.

    Ever hear of Old Man strength?? it's real. I can bench my dad and one half and he'd whoop my butt.......
    Old man strength is a myth that old men bring up to compensate for the fact that their records are being broken. The game is being played at a much faster rate these days which leads to greater forces and higher impact.

    Answer me this. Two guys go against each other in a shoving match much like one that goes on at the line. Person A is 260lbs and benches 500lbs. Person B is 330lbs and benches the same, which is highly unlikely, but let's just say it is true. Let's also say that their squat, clean, etc are the same. Who do you think is going to have an easier time moving the other guy around. If you can honestly say that it is the same I would back off. Personally, I think it may be close in the first few minutes of a game, but there is a big difference between moving half your max bench for an hour and moving 66% for an hour. If you don't believe me, try it.

    I do agree that new rules baby the players, so maybe tougher is a poor choice of words.
    Last edited by Dale Mabry; 02-03-2005 at 05:58 PM.
    If sense were common, everyone would have it.

    4/2007-Current 75th Ranked most popular image 1 spot behind Prince's bulge...

  2. #32
    Its time to eat...AGAIN!

    Egoatdoor's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Richmond Virginia
    Posts
    1,038
    Rep Points
    10

    1. Steelers. Had the most competition within its own conference as well as in the Super Bowls. Dominating defense and all around offense that could beat you running or passing.
    2. Packers. 5 titles and one Championship game loss(1960) in nine years. Beat some very good teams like the Giants, the Baltimore Colts and of course the Cowboys in the "Ice Bowl". Very very close with the Steelers.
    3. Pats. 3 titles in 4 years, beating two very good teams in St Louis and Philadelphia. If they somehow get to 6, they would be number one despite the more watered down competition in a post expansion post free agency era.
    4. Cowboys. Very good team, but faced weak competition in its Super Bowl wins.
    5.49ers. Very good again, but its Super Bowl competitors ( Miami, Cincinnati twice and Denver) were the weakest of all.
    Last edited by Egoatdoor; 02-06-2005 at 09:50 PM.
    Getting bigger is a battle and the weapon is my fork.

    "The harder I work, the luckier I get"- Jenny Lynn

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Steelers -- not Pats -- best franchise.
    By min0 lee in forum Sports
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-07-2009, 11:50 AM
  2. The Pats and the Jets, whose gonna win?
    By thefutureisnow in forum Sports
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-24-2006, 08:32 AM
  3. MothaF--K New England (...I don't mean the Pats)
    By Goodfella9783 in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-27-2005, 06:43 PM
  4. Pats STILL don't get respect
    By Flex in forum Sports
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 01-23-2005, 08:12 PM
  5. Congrates to the Pats!!!!!!!
    By Tank316 in forum Sports
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-26-2002, 09:45 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.