Fugk TOOriginally Posted by bio-chem
Patriots
Eagles


You can't just do that. The whole game would have been different if he didn't play. TO did awesome but I don't think it would have been a blow out. I defense did a great job.Originally Posted by Dale Mabry
Fugk TOOriginally Posted by bio-chem
"I don't like small cars or real big women, but somehow I always find myself in 'em" - KR
They did a good job, forcing only 1 turnover is not a great Defense. I wonder how this whole thing is gonna pan out, we have a few months to see.Originally Posted by Doublebase
If sense were common, everyone would have it.
4/2007-Current 75th Ranked most popular image 1 spot behind Prince's bulge...
![]()
![]()
GOOOOOOOO EAGLES!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
Rules? You mean we have RULES for that???


Yes it is. You can have an awesome defense forcing 0 turnovers. IMO.Originally Posted by Dale Mabry
Actually, they did force zero turnovers, the one turnover that occured was from a botched snap.
I don't think anyone other than an Eagles fan could be satisfied with that defensive performance. They gave up 24 points and there were no spectacular plays. Now, I would efinitely agree that from week 4 on the Eagles Defense was cream of the crop, just not in the Super Bowl. I think Indie beats the Pats in the conference championship if they played like they did in the Super Bowl, and the Indie defense was a JV crew.
Oh, my darkhorse for this year is the Raiders, they may actually have themselves a team this year, and Peyton is the king of the choke. With TO not in Philly, Atlanta represents the NFC.![]()
If sense were common, everyone would have it.
4/2007-Current 75th Ranked most popular image 1 spot behind Prince's bulge...


Phillysucks.comOriginally Posted by ALBOB
I train differently than most, my beef is with gravity the weights on the bar are just the medium...Thanks to Wall Street your slice of the American Pie has been reduced to a crumb.
Originally Posted by LAM
![]()
Rules? You mean we have RULES for that???
DISCLAIMER: