Fantasy football help

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 41 of 41
  1. #31
    Founder of GOSB
    SUPER MODERATOR

    ZECH's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Down by the River
    Posts
    20,175
    Rep Points
    413505227


    I have Mcgahee in one of my leagues and he has been pretty consistant so far. Maybe not in the class as several of the top guys, but you can depend on him.






    Disclaimer: All health, fitness, diet, nutrition, anabolic steroid & supplement information posted here is intended for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice from a medical doctor. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. If you choose to use AAS it's your responsibility to know the laws of the country that you live in. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website.

  2. #32
    Registered User

    CancerNV's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    454
    Rep Points
    670693

    Quote Originally Posted by dg806
    I have Mcgahee in one of my leagues and he has been pretty consistant so far. Maybe not in the class as several of the top guys, but you can depend on him.
    I live in Buffalo so I see and read about Mcgahee all the time.

    If your in a TD heavy leage dont play Mcgahee if you have an equal or better running back. IMHO Mchagee is a top 5 back in the NFL. The Bills offensive line is probably one of the worst in the leage. Whenever were in a 3rd and short or a goal line situation our line gets plowed and Mcgahee runs nowhere. In every other running sitaution he is an absolute freak.

    Another plus to having Mcgahee is the QB situation in Buffalo. Holcomb and Losman both suck. Our running game should be our main offensive weapon. I think our coaches learned that finally.

    Prediction for weak 6 against the Jets...

    140 yards rushing with 1 TD. Start him.

  3. #33
    007
    007 is offline
    Registered User

    007's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    273
    Rep Points
    10

    I hope you are right. I traded for McGahee two weeks ago (Martin and Djaxs for him). So far he has been pretty good. You are right they have problems with their offensive line. I am a Bills fan living in NJ. Don't know how, but I have liked them for quite some time now.
    I don't think Holcomb is that bad and Losman would be better if the OL got better.

    Quote Originally Posted by CancerNV
    I live in Buffalo so I see and read about Mcgahee all the time.

    If your in a TD heavy leage dont play Mcgahee if you have an equal or better running back. IMHO Mchagee is a top 5 back in the NFL. The Bills offensive line is probably one of the worst in the leage. Whenever were in a 3rd and short or a goal line situation our line gets plowed and Mcgahee runs nowhere. In every other running sitaution he is an absolute freak.

    Another plus to having Mcgahee is the QB situation in Buffalo. Holcomb and Losman both suck. Our running game should be our main offensive weapon. I think our coaches learned that finally.

    Prediction for weak 6 against the Jets...

    140 yards rushing with 1 TD. Start him.
    "O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and wholesome in the earth, and follow not the footsteps of the devil. Lo! he is an open enemy for you." Q(2:168)

  4. #34
    Registered User

    CancerNV's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    454
    Rep Points
    670693

    Quote Originally Posted by 007
    I hope you are right. I traded for McGahee two weeks ago (Martin and Djaxs for him). So far he has been pretty good. You are right they have problems with their offensive line. I am a Bills fan living in NJ. Don't know how, but I have liked them for quite some time now.
    I don't think Holcomb is that bad and Losman would be better if the OL got better.
    No, your right. Holcomb isnt bad. He's Holcomb though. He wouldnt start for 25 teams right now. Losman is plain bad right now though. He plays nervous in the pocket and when he has an open receiver he lacks the accuracy to hit him.

    The good news is that Buffalo was built to win this year and next year. If our GM can fix our offensive line we could be a good team next year.

  5. #35
    007
    007 is offline
    Registered User

    007's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    273
    Rep Points
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by CancerNV
    No, your right. Holcomb isnt bad. He's Holcomb though. He wouldnt start for 25 teams right now. Losman is plain bad right now though. He plays nervous in the pocket and when he has an open receiver he lacks the accuracy to hit him.

    The good news is that Buffalo was built to win this year and next year. If our GM can fix our offensive line we could be a good team next year.
    I hope so. Unfortunately I haven't had a chance to watch them this year. This weekend I will. Do you think they will beat the Jets? I think they can.
    "O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and wholesome in the earth, and follow not the footsteps of the devil. Lo! he is an open enemy for you." Q(2:168)

  6. #36
    Registered User

    CancerNV's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    454
    Rep Points
    670693

    Quote Originally Posted by 007
    I hope so. Unfortunately I haven't had a chance to watch them this year. This weekend I will. Do you think they will beat the Jets? I think they can.
    I think there about as good as the jets but the Bills are coming off some weak momentum and its at home.

    Im going to say Bills 20 - 13

  7. #37
    Registered User

    CancerNV's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    454
    Rep Points
    670693

    Did anyone else notice that I said Willis Mcgahee was going to have 140 yards rushing with 1 TD and he got 143 yeards rushing and 1 TD?

  8. #38
    007
    007 is offline
    Registered User

    007's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    273
    Rep Points
    10

    Good prediction!. I think he will have another great week next week in Oakland.


    Quote Originally Posted by CancerNV
    Did anyone else notice that I said Willis Mcgahee was going to have 140 yards rushing with 1 TD and he got 143 yeards rushing and 1 TD?
    "O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and wholesome in the earth, and follow not the footsteps of the devil. Lo! he is an open enemy for you." Q(2:168)

  9. #39
    Registered User

    CancerNV's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    454
    Rep Points
    670693

    Quote Originally Posted by 007
    Good prediction!. I think he will have another great week next week in Oakland.


    Im not so sure. Oaklands run defense is actually decent. I could also see the Raiders putting together a nice offensive game and if they jump to an early lead expect the morons running the Bills to all but abandon the run.

    Im going to say Mcgahee has 100 yards rushing with 2 TD's.

    Raiders win 27 - 17

  10. #40
    007
    007 is offline
    Registered User

    007's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    273
    Rep Points
    10

    A. Johnson (HOU) is a free agent in league. Do you think I should risk picking him up? He hasn't been doing all that great. If I did, who should I drop?
    Housh, Llyod, T. Taylor, or L. Coles
    I think I am leanig toward Taylor or Coles.
    "O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and wholesome in the earth, and follow not the footsteps of the devil. Lo! he is an open enemy for you." Q(2:168)

  11. #41
    Registered User

    CancerNV's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    454
    Rep Points
    670693

    Dont pick up A Johnson until hes on a team with an NFL caliber offense. The Texans are so bad right now.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Fantasy Football
    By RAWS n More in forum Sports
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-01-2011, 07:11 PM
  2. I.M. Fantasy Football '07
    By the nut in forum Sports
    Replies: 157
    Last Post: 08-14-2008, 12:44 PM
  3. Fantasy Football
    By Doublebase in forum Sports
    Replies: 117
    Last Post: 10-03-2006, 03:38 PM
  4. Fantasy Football???
    By ALBOB in forum Sports
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 07-24-2002, 02:50 PM
  5. fantasy football
    By I Are Baboon in forum Sports
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-28-2001, 08:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.