Well you got Deuce and Willis going against two tough D's. It's a tough choice but I'd still start them over Westbrook.
I've got to choose two starters this week:
Deuce McCallister
Willis McGahee
Brian Westbrook
I can't believe I'm thinking about this, but I'm seriously considering sitting Deuce. Any thoughts?
Rules? You mean we have RULES for that???
Well you got Deuce and Willis going against two tough D's. It's a tough choice but I'd still start them over Westbrook.


I dunno. Westbrook is playing the 49er's this week. I think he will have a great game. Probably 2 td's. Just start Westbrook.
Yeah, I think that's the way I'm going. I'm starting Mcgahee and Westbrook. You'll probably see me in here kicking myself on Monday but, what the hell?Originally Posted by Doublebase
Rules? You mean we have RULES for that???


I think thats a good idea. Do a follow up on Monday. Ofcourse I won't be here all next week. Gotta work the President's Cup. Yay.
Do you RBs get points for receptions?
Westbrook catches alot of balls.
My Carb Cycling Progress - you can't hide from the numbers.
Oh, and what is this a 5-team league? You have three first round backs in both of my leagues. Three top 10 picks in one.
My Carb Cycling Progress - you can't hide from the numbers.


Yaoo does. Go with Westbrook or McgaheeOriginally Posted by Pepper
Disclaimer: All health, fitness, diet, nutrition, anabolic steroid & supplement information posted here is intended for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice from a medical doctor. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. If you choose to use AAS it's your responsibility to know the laws of the country that you live in. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website.
I guess I'm the only one who'd sit'em. We'll see... That's why they play the game.
Our backs get one point for every 20 rushing yards and one point for every 30 receiving yards. That's another reason I'm leaning toward Westbrook.Originally Posted by Pepper
Yeah, I got pretty lucky in the draft. For some reason there was an early run on QB's and WR's. Peyton Manning and Randy Moss went quick so every body panicked. I just kept raking in good RB's. My starting QB is Drew Breese, so I'm not at all upset about waiting.
P.S. It's a 10 team league. My #4 RB is Steven Jackson from the Rams. I think I'm set for RB's.![]()
Rules? You mean we have RULES for that???


Mcgahee sucked this week. I lost this week because I put in Lelie instead of TJ. Housh. Next week I will start Housh.![]()
"O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and wholesome in the earth, and follow not the footsteps of the devil. Lo! he is an open enemy for you." Q(2:168)
So far it looks like I should have gone with Westbrook and Steven Jackson. I went with Westbrook and Mcgahee. I'll be interested to see what McCallister does tonight. I think I'm gonna stick with Westbrook and McCallister until the other two show me some consistancy.
Luckily I won my matchup. I was up by 21 with no players left and my opponent had Trent Green and Priest Holmes still to play. First time in my life I was cheering for Da' Raiders. I ended up winning by 7.
I hear ya' on Ashley Lelie. He's my #3 WR and he hasn't done a thing yet this year. I keep hoping Denver will start producing. I'm hurting at that position since I lost Javon Walker. (My wife has T.J. Housh.................and she left him on the bench too.)
Rules? You mean we have RULES for that???
The other thing that keeps getting me is Wiggins. Everything I read says he will do well, but I guess Culpepper is not producing. However, I keep making the mistake and benching McMichaels. Not next week forget about Culpepper and wiggins.
"O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and wholesome in the earth, and follow not the footsteps of the devil. Lo! he is an open enemy for you." Q(2:168)
OK who to start?
Brady versus PIT
or
Brees versus NYG
![]()
Second question
Martin versus JAC
or
Barlow versus DAL
or
Blaylock versus JAC
I would normally just stick with Martin, but he may not start. I am not sure if it is worth the risk.
"O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and wholesome in the earth, and follow not the footsteps of the devil. Lo! he is an open enemy for you." Q(2:168)
Brady...that one is easy.
Martin then Barlow...but you have a RB problem!![]()
My Carb Cycling Progress - you can't hide from the numbers.
Gore is gonna take Barlow's job...I'd pick him up if I could.
My Carb Cycling Progress - you can't hide from the numbers.
The man to have this week is Shaun Alexander vs the tender run defense of the overrated Cardinals.
My Carb Cycling Progress - you can't hide from the numbers.
I have LT for my first RB position. If Martin is hurt, then I have a big problem with my second RB position.Originally Posted by Pepper
"O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and wholesome in the earth, and follow not the footsteps of the devil. Lo! he is an open enemy for you." Q(2:168)
LT is a stud. He has a "matchup" problem this week, but most weeks he will be the best RB to have.
My Carb Cycling Progress - you can't hide from the numbers.
I just dropped Janikowski and picked up Wilkens. I hope it was a good move..
"O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and wholesome in the earth, and follow not the footsteps of the devil. Lo! he is an open enemy for you." Q(2:168)
Why? It's not like he's been lighting up the scoreboard this season. And going against the Steeler's D is gonna be ROUGH. It's not like I have a choice, but I'm going with Brees. (My backup is Delhomme.)Originally Posted by Pepper
Rules? You mean we have RULES for that???
If Brees was doing a little better, I wouldn't be worried. However he did horrible last week against Denver. Brady might be the safer pick. Not sure if I want to risk it.
Originally Posted by ALBOB
"O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and wholesome in the earth, and follow not the footsteps of the devil. Lo! he is an open enemy for you." Q(2:168)
What do you think of my RB situation. Risk Martin or go for Barlow? I also have Blaylock.
Originally Posted by ALBOB
"O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and wholesome in the earth, and follow not the footsteps of the devil. Lo! he is an open enemy for you." Q(2:168)
Wow, that's a good question. My philosophy is usually to stick with the studs. The problem with that is the studs seem to be nothing more than duds this year. I think I'd risk Martin one more week before experimenting.Originally Posted by 007
Rules? You mean we have RULES for that???
Play the matchups son!!
I'm 33 years old, 5'-10", and 169lb - I'm fairly lean and have an athletic shape. My goal is to cut down to 164lb in six weeks, w/o sacrificing muscle mass. HELP!!


Did I tell you wrong?? NOPE!Originally Posted by dg806
Disclaimer: All health, fitness, diet, nutrition, anabolic steroid & supplement information posted here is intended for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice from a medical doctor. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. If you choose to use AAS it's your responsibility to know the laws of the country that you live in. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website.
Someone is offering McCardell for Coles... Should I take it?
![]()
"O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and wholesome in the earth, and follow not the footsteps of the devil. Lo! he is an open enemy for you." Q(2:168)
McCardell seems to be more steady whereas Coles will put up huge numbers one game and then not show up at all the next. Guess you have to decide which is more important.Originally Posted by 007
Anybody got a 1st string QB they don't need. I'll give you Deuce McCallister for him.![]()
Rules? You mean we have RULES for that???
Why all the Mcgahee hate?
DISCLAIMER: