Well yesterday the Blue Jays sign B.J. Ryan to the largest contract for a reliever in MLB history. He has had one good year last year finishing 26 of 31 save attempts.
Am I the only one going WTF are they doing with a limited payroll to be dishing out close to 10 mill a season to a closer?
That is beyond shaking things up.... He is a reliever who has proven nothing other then one year. Relievers are a whacky bunch.... prolly the only closer that you feel pretty confident about is Mariano Riveria. Plus there are still Talks with AJ burnett.... and they still need some solid bats.
2) Defending Ryan's dealposted: Sunday, November 27, 2005 | Feedback
The landmark B.J. Ryan deal is the talk of the baseball industry, with executives from other teams stunned by how much the Blue Jays doled out to the lefty closer with 42 career saves.
Old friend Ken Rosenthal lays out all the reasons why the deal appears to be insanity. Since J.P. Ricciardi, the Blue Jays general manager, is not yet discussing the contract, let me take a stab at what his explanation will be:
1. The Blue Jays believe they will contend in the next couple of years and they need someone better than Miguel Batista at closer to do so, particularly in the meatgrinder AL East. Signing an erratic Kyle Farnsworth or an aging Todd Jones might have been a solution for 2006, but not for the long-term, and Ryan is the best closer on the market who is closer to his 30th birthday (he's 29, as of today) than his 35th birthday.
2. The Blue Jays knew they were not going to sign Billy Wagner. Conventional wisdom is that Wagner is going to land with the Mets, Phillies, Braves or Red Sox; if the Jays wanted a major upgrade at closer, it would have to be Ryan ... or Ryan. He was their only option.
3. Toronto was scared to death of what the losers in the Billy Wagner sweepstakes would do. The Mets or the Phillies, in particular, undoubtedly would have turned their attention to Ryan, the next-best-thing on the market, and during the subsequent Ryan negotiations, the market correction from the Wagner deal would have been in effect. In other words, if the Wagner negotiations played out and the Mets had won with a four-year, $44 million contract, then Ryan would have become the centerpiece of a major bidding war and the lefty's agent would have insisted that his client get at least four years and $36 million. At the outset. Paul Hoynes reports in his notebook that Ryan already had a four-year offer in hand, from the Cleveland Indians, and may have gone to a fifth year, had they been given a chance.
4. The Blue Jays believe they have to overpay for free agents this winter in order to change the perception of their club, in much the same way the Mets believed that signing Pedro Martinez would shift the thinking about their team.
It's hard to imagine that only a dozen years ago, Toronto was a place where free agents like Paul Molitor wanted to be; the team had won a championship, fans flocked to SkyDome, and the organization was thriving. When Blue Jays left-hander Jimmy Key became a free agent after the 1992 season and was courted by the Yankees, the question being asked then was whether Key would leave a great situation in Toronto and venture to the doldrums of the Bronx. He wound up taking an offer from the Yankees, of four years and $17 million, that was above and beyond the perceived market for pitchers at that time. Gene Michael, the general manager at the time, has always believed that the Key signing represented a turning point in how free agents viewed the Yankees.
The strike of '94-'95 devastated the Blue Jays, who have not been part of the postseason since 1993 and have posted winning records in only 4 of the last 12 seasons. Toronto is now widely viewed as a place where free agents don't go, and so maybe the Blue Jays believe that their $47 million is being spent on a talented lefty and organizational credibility. That's part of the reason why the Mets overpaid for Pedro, and it's got to be part of the reason why the Jays are overpaying for Ryan.
Given all those dynamics, I'm betting that Ricciardi will say that he felt he had to move fast, be aggressive, take a chance, make a pre-emptive strike. A question that executives often ask agents, at the outset of negotiations, is this: What would it take for us to close this negotiation, right now?
The answer from Ryan's side might have been five years and $47 million. And Ricciardi bit.
This deal represents an enormous gamble for the Blue Jays, because unlike the Red Sox or the Yankees, Toronto doesn't have the kind of budget to simply paper over its mistakes. If Ryan stinks or he gets hurt, the financial obligation to a pitcher with the one-season track record as closer will cripple the team. The same could be said if the Blue Jays sign A.J. Burnett to a 50-plus million dollar deal and Burnett doesn't pan out.
Ricciardi is taking his shot, and when you're operating in a mid-level market, you've only got one or two bullets to fire. Ricciardi might get a few phone calls from exasperated peers, but he's got reasons for making his play, right now.
The Ryan signing might help the Jays land Burnett, writes Bob Elliott. Peter Schmuck says he's seen crazy deals before. The Braves are in Billy Wagner chase the, but it's hard to imagine Atlanta will be willing to throw out a five-year offer for the lefty.
Well yesterday the Blue Jays sign B.J. Ryan to the largest contract for a reliever in MLB history. He has had one good year last year finishing 26 of 31 save attempts.
Am I the only one going WTF are they doing with a limited payroll to be dishing out close to 10 mill a season to a closer?
Well I give the Jays credit for going out and doing something. Seems like all they have done in recent years is slash payroll.
The problem I have with the Jays throwing all this money at a closer is, since their starting pitching sucks ass goblins (outside Roy Halladay), how many save chances will BJ Ryan actually get?
I dont think the rotation is as bad as you say. Actually I know it isnt.
Halladay is argueably the best pitcher in the AL
Lilly was an allstar 2 yrs ago and has been a solid #3 throughout his career
Chacin was a ROY contender, had 13w and 3.72ERA.
Towers had 13w and a 3.71ERA
Bush should be a solid 3
Batista might go back into the rotation. Always been a solid mid-rotaion guy. Good for 200 innings
AND we will get a #2. I bet it will be Burnett or a trade for Zito.
And our bullpen is one of the best in the majors. So, if you meant to say Toronto should have some of the best pitching in the league, I agree
Well yesterday the Blue Jays sign B.J. Ryan to the largest contract for a reliever in MLB history. He has had one good year last year finishing 26 of 31 save attempts.
Am I the only one going WTF are they doing with a limited payroll to be dishing out close to 10 mill a season to a closer?
For once it wasn't the Yanks inflating the market.
Looks like the Jays are still going to be busy this off season...
Yesterday the Jays traded Dave Bush, outfield prospect Gabe Gross and a player to be named later to Milwaukee for, Lyle Overbay, a left-handed hitter who is eligible for arbitration, batted .276 with 19 homers and 72 runs-batted in last year.
Wonder what will be happening to Eric Hinske and Shae Hillenbrand?
Obviouly it still looks like the Jays have some dealing to do.
A bit of overpayment for Overbay, but he's solid and dirt cheap for the next 3 years. This deal gives us the best right side of the diamond defensivly in the majors. I don't like giving up ZJ. I would have preferred Shea + Bush, which was rumored.
Yeah, JP still has some work to do. Our infield is way too crowded. I just nope it's not the reported Hudson + Batista for Wilkerson
DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.