UFC Liddell vs. Couture 3

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 36 of 36
  1. #31
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    28
    Rep Points
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by Goodfella9783
    Yup. Liddell won by KO in the second round. I think the encore is comin up on PPV if you still wanna catch it. From what I've heard it wasn't all that great though.
    http://www.youtube.com/w/Chuck-Lidde...earch=ufc%2057

    Don't pay $39.95.

  2. #32
    Registered User

    Goodfella9783's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    4,227
    Rep Points
    1640225

    Wasn't planning on it. Good lookin out on the Vid though I didn't feel like waiting a year for it to be on Spike.

  3. #33
    Registered User

    Fifedogg's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    58
    Rep Points
    10

    Damn!

    Cro Cop is Crazy. He broke that guys Jaw quick, and broke that guys ribs bad. There is a reason why guys like that arent in the UFC. As much as I like Liddell, he would get crushed.
    "A goal is not always meant to be reached, it often serves simply as something to aim at" - Bruce Lee

    Current stats: Age 22
    (Apr 10 06):Weight: 205-208 | Bench: 285 x 1 / 225 x 8 | B.F. 9% Gettin ready to cut

  4. #34
    Registered User

    Goodfella9783's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    4,227
    Rep Points
    1640225

    Quote Originally Posted by Fifedogg
    Cro Cop is Crazy. He broke that guys Jaw quick, and broke that guys ribs bad. There is a reason why guys like that arent in the UFC. As much as I like Liddell, he would get crushed.
    I wouldn't count the Iceman out of any fight, especially a striker like Crocop. Crocop stood in with Fedor Emelianenko. Chuck handled Babalu, who stood in with Fedor. Not trying to solve any puzzle or anything, speculation like that usually doesn't mean anything... I'm just sayin in my opinion any of these guys have a good chance against each other.

  5. #35
    Elite Kiki
    ELITE MEMBER

    BigDyl's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Securityland
    Posts
    15,750
    Rep Points
    9693948

    Quote Originally Posted by Goodfella9783
    I wouldn't count the Iceman out of any fight, especially a striker like Crocop. Crocop stood in with Fedor Emelianenko. Chuck handled Babalu, who stood in with Fedor. Not trying to solve any puzzle or anything, speculation like that usually doesn't mean anything... I'm just sayin in my opinion any of these guys have a good chance against each other.

    What does stood mean? Babalu is the man, but he lost to Fedor.


    Crocop lost to Fedor also. And I think CroCop would murder Lidell.
    Quote Originally Posted by kbm8795 View Post
    Oh, I think Americans understand that the one thing conservatives hate the most is the idea of spending American tax money on Americans. . .in America.


    Your tax money is safe. . .in Iraq.
    Total ownage.

  6. #36
    Registered User

    Goodfella9783's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    4,227
    Rep Points
    1640225

    Quote Originally Posted by BigDyl
    What does stood mean? Babalu is the man, but he lost to Fedor.


    Crocop lost to Fedor also. And I think CroCop would murder Lidell.
    Standing in with someone (or stood in) means that you didn't lay down to them easy. It was a decent fight, shots were traded, etc, etc. I was just sayin that they're all on basically the same level and all of em are capable of beating each other. As for Crocop murdering Liddell, it's possible, but it's also possible for Liddell to beat Crocop. It's a fight man anything can happen. I haven't seen many Crocop fights, but just seeing his KO highlight reels won't persuade me, because the Iceman's are just as impressive.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. COUTURE labs
    By bigoli in forum Anabolic Zone
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-17-2007, 08:25 PM
  2. Sylvia vs Couture
    By Doublebase in forum Sports
    Replies: 102
    Last Post: 03-05-2007, 07:16 PM
  3. Randy Couture going heavyweight
    By BigPapaPump68 in forum Sports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-12-2007, 02:34 PM
  4. Couture vs. Ortiz II
    By Pedigree in forum Sports
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-24-2006, 03:24 AM
  5. [UGL Series] Couture Labs
    By musclepump in forum Steroid Pictures
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-22-2006, 03:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.