Cowboys vs. Eagles Best Game

**MCx2** · 10-09-2006, 12:59 PM

Originally Posted by Goodfella9783

1. Who says I'm on TO's dick? I just said he's one of the best receivers in the league which he is. Question his talent to any expert or scout. I'm the one saying that this game wasn't about just him. This isn't a fuckin soap opera kid. Fuck what he does off the field. I'm in it to see good players perform on the field. What they do off the field I could give 2 shits about. TO will do his thing eventually. Whether it's put up huge numbers or not play. The media will be dick riding until he retires.

2. I knew you'd misundertsand that. My bad. I meant media who like have the same mindset you do. That just keep talking about TO like this one game was all about him. That's not good for football.

3. No it isn't. But that's not what I'm saying. Obviously the Eagles have adapted since then. It was a long time ago. I was saying it wasn't a coincidence that as soon as they get TO, they go to the Superbowl. As soon as he's gone. They go nowhere. Can't deny it no matter what.

I don't think it's a soap opera, the fact is: TO's mouth > TO's talent.

And Philly proved it yesterday.

**tucker01** · 10-09-2006, 01:03 PM

Originally Posted by FatCatMC

This was actually the first week they weren't able to run the ball effectively. They have a core of recievers that are all equals, and most of them have been in the system for many years now, and you're right, McNabb needs to move more.

They did a horrible job last week against a shitty Packers team trying to develop a running game.

**Dale Mabry** · 10-09-2006, 01:05 PM

Originally Posted by FatCatMC

This was actually the first week they weren't able to run the ball effectively. They have a core of recievers that are all equals, and most of them have been in the system for many years now, and you're right, McNabb needs to move more.

They have yet to run the ball effectively. By effectively, I mean that they are able to run the ball to run out the clock with the lead in the second half. That is the single reason they couldn't put away the giants.

Look who they have played...

Green Bay
Giants
San Fran
Houston
Cowboys

With that line up, they should lead the league in rushing. This was their only bad week rushing, but it was also their only week playing a better than below average defense.

**MCx2** · 10-09-2006, 01:06 PM

Originally Posted by IainDaniel

They did a horrible job last week against a shitty Packers team trying to develop a running game.

Without their starter Westbrook.... And they still put up decent numbers, at least better than previous years...

**MCx2** · 10-09-2006, 01:10 PM

Originally Posted by Dale Mabry

They have yet to run the ball effectively. By effectively, I mean that they are able to run the ball to run out the clock with the lead in the second half. That is the single reason they couldn't put away the giants.

Look who they have played...

Green Bay
Giants
San Fran
Houston
Cowboys

With that line up, they should lead the league in rushing. This was their only bad week rushing, but it was also their only week playing a better than below average defense.

They shouldn't be able to run the ball at all, I mean lets be realistic. In no way is Westbrook a traditional RB. He can't run between the tackles to save his life, in fact I was pissed when they re-signed him. We all know Andy Reid wants to pass the ball 70% of the time, so in that reguard, yes, they are running the ball effectively.

And there was no single reason they lost to the Giants. Injuries to the secondary and a few blown assignments allowed the Giants back in that game.

**Goodfella9783** · 10-09-2006, 01:32 PM

Originally Posted by FatCatMC

I don't think it's a soap opera, the fact is: TO's mouth > TO's talent.

And Philly proved it yesterday.

I don't know about that.

He has 10,767 career receiving yards (more than Marvin Harrison, Shannon Sharpe; Andre Rison, Jimmy Smith, Isaac Bruce -- all future hall of famers); 102 Td's; 733 receptions; 505 first downs; averages 73.7 YPG; holds the record for most receptions in one game (20);

**MCx2** · 10-09-2006, 02:13 PM

Originally Posted by Goodfella9783

I don't know about that.

He has 10,767 career receiving yards (more than Marvin Harrison, Shannon Sharpe; Andre Rison, Jimmy Smith, Isaac Bruce -- all future hall of famers); 102 Td's; 733 receptions; 505 first downs; averages 73.7 YPG; holds the record for most receptions in one game (20);

And it's his off field antics and sideline attitude that will probably prevent him from being a 1st balloter, like his buddy Michael Irvin.

I'm not saying he's no good, but he has proven time and time again that he causes more problems than he's worth. Until he gets a ring around his finger, and stops burning bridges everywhere he goes, he's a piece of shit in my book.

**Dale Mabry** · 10-09-2006, 02:15 PM

Michael Irvin got busted for coke, TO will be a first balloter, IMO.

**themamasan** · 10-09-2006, 04:34 PM

I'm a Cowboys fan and I hate TO. I have seen only 3 games this year and I have seen him drop 7 passes (catchable passes). Most average recievers can go a whole season without that many drops.

As far as Bledsoe, I think he took that sack because they must have changed the rules this year about intentional grounding. He got one called on him on the first or second drive of the game where he was under no pressure and decided to throw it out of bounds. But then the refs decided to throw a flag a minute later. ANd his the last two interceptions were due to the fact he made shitty throws.

**god hand** · 10-09-2006, 04:42 PM

I dont understand how u dont not go DEEP to TO at least once in the game. If I learned anything Its Bill Parcells is

when it comes to play calling.

**JerseyDevil** · 10-09-2006, 06:24 PM

Despite the fact I can practically see the Linc from my house just across the Delaware In Southern NJ, I'm not really an Eagles fan. I do tend to support the team however.

My observations are, if anyone cares..... Owens IS a great WR. Although he is a trouble maker on the field and a disruption to his team, at least he isn't getting cited for criminal offenses like a Michael Irvin or Randy Moss. That said... what a whiney bitch on the sideline! Can't believe no one has brought that up. Give it time. He eventually WILL be making comments to the press about Bledsloe, and when Romo tanks, it'll be even worse. Kind of shame really. A wide out with that much talent will more then likely have a NFL epitaph of "The 10 Million Dollar Mistake" .

**Double D** · 10-09-2006, 07:02 PM

At the end of last year I said "I would take TO on my team". Now I wouldnt take him if he was gave to me. He is a cancer to a team. he does nothing, but dig deep into the heart of the team and tear it apart. And in the meantime he makes the whole atmosphere that comes with him into a circus!

**MCx2** · 10-10-2006, 06:24 AM

Originally Posted by themamasan

I'm a Cowboys fan and I hate TO. I have seen only 3 games this year and I have seen him drop 7 passes (catchable passes). Most average recievers can go a whole season without that many drops.

As far as Bledsoe, I think he took that sack because they must have changed the rules this year about intentional grounding. He got one called on him on the first or second drive of the game where he was under no pressure and decided to throw it out of bounds. But then the refs decided to throw a flag a minute later. ANd his the last two interceptions were due to the fact he made shitty throws.

Yeah I thought 2 of them were batted at, I was thinking about the one that Lito Sheppard dropped. Bledsoe sucks.

**Boost777** · 10-13-2006, 08:08 AM

Did you miss the Giants Eagles game, that one had by far the best ending

**MCx2** · 10-13-2006, 11:33 AM

Originally Posted by Boost777

Did you miss the Giants Eagles game, that one had by far the best ending

Yeah, 3 injuries to the Eagles secondary... Giants should be proud.

**Goodfella9783** · 10-13-2006, 12:22 PM

Regardless, Eagles should have held on to that lead. I don't care if it's all WR's in the secondary.

**MCx2** · 10-13-2006, 12:29 PM

Originally Posted by Goodfella9783

Regardless, Eagles should have held on to that lead. I don't care if it's all WR's in the secondary.

There were blown coverages, missed assignments, and guys that haven't even played before. I'm not making excuses, but that was a major contributer...

**Doublebase** · 10-13-2006, 01:33 PM

Originally Posted by Goodfella9783

Regardless, Eagles should have held on to that lead. I don't care if it's all WR's in the secondary.

We know we can man handle the giants if we have to. We are the best in our division and will be in the NFC championship game.

**MCx2** · 10-13-2006, 01:35 PM

Originally Posted by Doublebase

We know we can man handle the giants if we have to. We are the best in our division and will be in the NFC championship game.

Don't mind him, he is what you call "a hater."

Thread: Cowboys vs. Eagles Best Game

Thread Tools

Display

Similar Threads

How about them Cowboys!

Eagles Cowboys...Who you got?

Eagles - Redskins game

How bout DEM Cowboys???

Cowboys

Posting Permissions