Thread: It's official Liddell vs. Jackson II

Aw right. About time. Now well see if the asshole improved.

Which one am I talking about? Now that is the riddle.

Their 1st fight

Beat you to it . Should be an insane fight though. There's going to be so much hype up until it I hope the fight measures up. Whatever happened to Inside the UFC on Spike? Didn't last long.

Liddell - Jackson II set for May 26!

Originally Posted by Goodfella9783

Beat you to it . Should be an insane fight though. There's going to be so much hype up until it I hope the fight measures up. Whatever happened to Inside the UFC on Spike? Didn't last long.

Liddell - Jackson II set for May 26!

Damnit!! How'd I miss that.



Goodfella - 1
ReproMan - 1

Now we're even.

I'm surprised Rampage didn't try to milk it for a few more $100K paydays. Of cource chuck will get the KO this time.

This will be it. If he beats Rampage, then and only then, will I say hes a good fighter.

Seriously, I cant see a way around saying it!

During that interview with Joe Rogan, I got nervous about him eating friend chicken and smoking, that it doesnt look like hes serious about this.

Now, maybe he will be.

Originally Posted by AKIRA

This will be it. If he beats Rampage, then and only then, will I say hes a good fighter.

Seriously, I cant see a way around saying it!

During that interview with Joe Rogan, I got nervous about him eating friend chicken and smoking, that it doesnt look like hes serious about this.

Now, maybe he will be.

I felt the same way. Now that he's a recognizable face, will he let it go to his head?

He'd better get serious, Chuck will KHTFO if he doesn't.

Originally Posted by AKIRA

This will be it. If he beats Rampage, then and only then, will I say hes a good fighter.

Seriously, I cant see a way around saying it!

During that interview with Joe Rogan, I got nervous about him eating friend chicken and smoking, that it doesnt look like hes serious about this.

Now, maybe he will be.

I agree and diasgree. He does come off a little too mellow and seem to take fights lightly judging from his demeanor, but he's absolutely a great fighter. He's beaten:

Tito x 2 (KO's)
Randy x 2 (KO's)
Jeremy Horn
Vitor Belfort
Kevin Randleman
Guy Mezger
Jeff Monson
Babalu x 2 (KO's)

He's 20-3, 37 years old and looking pretty damn good. One of the most entertaining guys to watch. Even if he lost to Rampage, it shouldn't taint his career at all, just like Randy's shouldn't be tainted by his two losses against Chuck.

As much as I hate to say it, Chuck will knock him out.

Aaaaand a lil more Rampge



Ohhh yeah ... and this lil classic



Plus


the


rematch


A shorter version without all the Japspeak

Rampage can take one hell of a beating, that's for sure.

Now I have a dilemma. Sould I go to Vegas for this one, or do I wait for Mirko/ Couture later this summer?

Life is short then you die ... Do 'em both.

I know what Chuck has done in the past. But something in me always makes me believe hes a lucky striker.

Rampage BEAT him last time. I am using the word Beat here. If Chuck wins, then Ill just have to remove the "lucky" before striker.

Originally Posted by AKIRA

I know what Chuck has done in the past. But something in me always makes me believe hes a lucky striker.

Rampage BEAT him last time. I am using the word Beat here. If Chuck wins, then Ill just have to remove the "lucky" before striker.

What if it's a lucky strike KO ? Like a Scott Smith type deal. I personally don't remember Chuck beating anyone with a "lucky" strike. He's just an accurate puncher with hella power and sizes up every guy he fights as the fight progresses until he makes his move. I don't think there's anything lucky about it personally.

Originally Posted by AKIRA

I know what Chuck has done in the past. But something in me always makes me believe hes a lucky striker.

Rampage BEAT him last time. I am using the word Beat here. If Chuck wins, then Ill just have to remove the "lucky" before striker.

LOL ... yes indeed I'd call that a beating. Liddel was pounded on so bad White threw in the towel.

Both fighters have stayed active and fought tough opponents. If anything the edge goes to Rampage cuz it's always the hungrier fighter that trains the best.

Rampage had a serious weakness ... the muay thai clinch. Did he fix that and can Chuck use that?

Originally Posted by Goodfella9783

What if it's a lucky strike KO ? Like a Scott Smith type deal. I personally don't remember Chuck beating anyone with a "lucky" strike. He's just an accurate puncher with hella power and sizes up every guy he fights as the fight progresses until he makes his move. I don't think there's anything lucky about it personally.

Yeah I knew I was going to hear this. Its this argument that I dont accept. The strikes just look like shit to me. Even in slow motion. I still cant believe how unbeatable hes been. BUT. If he wins over a loss, then Ill accept that this is fighting.

Chuck "Iceman" Liddell highlight reel, sorry Akira.


Second to none countering IMO.