Orbitnutrition.com


Patrick Arnold says: New Progenex inferior to old formula

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    I'm CEO, Bitch!
    ADMINISTRATOR

    Prince's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    A Virtual Reality
    Posts
    53,757
    Rep Points
    1600942420


    Patrick Arnold says: New Progenex inferior to old formula

    Patrick Arnold says: New Progenex inferior to old formula
    by Anthony Roberts





    I’ve received numerous complaints about the new Progenex formula not being equal to the old version, including one from a very well known strength and conditioning coach, who works with several big-name NFL players.

    bThroughout the supplement industry, and in the professional strength training community, we’ve all taken to calling the new product “Nogenex” (as in, No-Progenex, because it no longer contains the original stuff that made it good).

    Unfortunately, as much as I’d like to repeat a lot of those comments here, most would rather not be involved in this mess…although it should suffice to say that a lot of NFL guys have stopped using Progenex, now that the old formula (and old formulator) is gone. While they were happy to shell out the bucks for the old version, they’ve put away their wallets after trying a bag of the new stuff.

    I tend to favor reviews from guys who are actually paying for product over the free and reduced price sponsored-logs we see all over the Internet. People who get free stuff, 99% of the time, say it’s good.

    Which brings me to the story of Patrick Arnold; a guy who probably needs no introduction to my average reader, as he was not only the BALCO chemist, but also the guy who brought both Prohormones & Methylhexanamine (the best selling product on Bodybuilding.com) to the supplement industry.

    Patrick, it turns out, had placed an order with Progenex for their new product, after they changed the formula. After receiving the new version, and noting that it had been changed, he wanted to return the product for his money back.

    They refunded his money, but told him to keep the product. He kept the product, got his money back, used it…and was disappointed. It didn’t work like the old formula, and was basically (according to him), just another protein powder. In fact, he appears to have been so disappointed with the product, that he took it upon himself to join the Crossfit message board, where they do the majority of their sales, and tell the members that the new Progenex was just a regular old protein powder, and not as good as the old formula. That’s pretty unheard of…because it’s one thing to be disappointed in a free product, it’s entirely another thing to be so disappointed with the product that it warrants going to a site they sponsor, and join just to trash the product.

    [Note: A Crossfit coach openly criticized Progenex on his blog, saying that he noticed a difference between the old and new version, but when the boys over at Progenex contacted the guy, the information was promptly removed.]

    Check it out:



    Not only did Patrick tell everyone on the Crossfit forums that the product wasn’t anything special, but he repeated his comments all over the ‘net, further noting that the new people running Progenex don’t have a clue about product formulation.



    So there you have it…Crossfit coaches, supplement designers, and a bunch of professional athletes…all saying that the new Progenex is just another protein powder. I’m sure the boys over at Progenex will respond with their usual lawsuit threats to me, will likely ask for the comments to and will issue a public statement that amounts to “check teh logz, brah.”
    At this point, it’s getting difficult to find anyone who’s actually involved in the nutritional or athletic community to stand up for the new Progenex, or the guys running the company.

    Patrick Arnold says: New Progenex inferior to old formula | Anthony Roberts

  2. #2
    Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    ocean front property on mars
    Posts
    164
    Rep Points
    3462152

    interesting. man, where do you find this stuff. lol.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-15-2012, 07:38 PM
  2. Patrick Arnold to plead guilty
    By topolo in forum Open Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-27-2006, 03:14 PM
  3. Patrick Arnold indicted!
    By topolo in forum Supplements
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-05-2005, 11:54 PM
  4. Patrick Arnold Raided
    By ZECH in forum Supplements
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-03-2005, 01:26 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.