Creatine users build more muscle mass with shorter rests
Creatine users build more muscle mass with shorter rests
If you do weight training first and foremost to build muscle mass rather than strength, then you might be interested in the study that sports scientists from the Federal University of Parana published in the Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition.
The article describes an experiment involving 22 experienced amateur bodybuilders, all of whom were creatine users [structural formula show below]. The first week they took 20 g creatine and 20 g maltodextrin daily; after that the dosage went down to 5 g creatine and 5 g maltodextrin a day.
All subjects trained six times a week and worked in cycles of three workouts in which all of the main muscle groups were covered; they all did the same exercises. They trained with weights at which they could manage 8-10 reps and did four sets of each exercise.
Half of the subjects trained for the eight weeks that the experiment lasted with two-minute rests between sets [CI]. The other half [DI] took increasingly shorter rests. During the first two weeks the DI group took two-minute rests between sets, but from week three they decreased the rests by 15 seconds each week. So in week three the subjects in DI took 105-second rests, in week four 90-second rests, in week six 60-second rests, in week seven 45-second rests and in week eight 30-second rests.
During the experiment the training volume (the number of kilograms the subjects lifted times the number of reps) increased for the group with a constant rest period. In the other group the training volume declined. The graph below shows the volume development for the bench presses.
Both groups gained strength, but the increase in maximal strength increased more in the group with constant rest periods than in the other group.
When it came to muscle mass, however, it was the training with increasingly shorter rests that led to better results. The researchers measured the subjects' muscle dimensions with MRI scans and saw that the muscle mass in the arms [CSAA] and in the thighs [CSAT] increased more in the DI group.
"Decreasing interval seems to be more efficient than constant interval to produce hypertrophic responses", the researchers conclude. They say they are now doing a bigger study, and that they will also look at subjects who don’t use creatine.
Source:
J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2011 Oct 27;8(1):17.
Hmmm, is it a [shorter rests + creatine] as the point equation thing, or simply the shorter rest = higher intensity = greater results in comparison to those who had longer rests, thus, lower intensity, therfore, lesser results. I think the outcome of this study would be true with or without creatine.
The EDT(Escalating Density Training) was probably a change of routine for the subjects, unlike the constant group. Change of routine has always helped my gains. And wouldn't the water weight from the creatine also increase muscle mass?
The EDT(Escalating Density Training) was probably a change of routine for the subjects, unlike the constant group. Change of routine has always helped my gains. And wouldn't the water weight from the creatine also increase muscle mass?
I'm sold. I am going to take me some creatine and only rest 30 seconds in between sets instead of 60. That way I will get tired easier but get bigger lol
DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.