Reply With QuoteSyngex 1 is 1-test/4-ad pce. Syngex 2 is 1,4ad/4-ht/19nor.
Syngex 1 and 2
Results 1 to 11 of 11
Thread: Syngex 1 and 2
-
09-30-2003, 03:52 PM #1Senior Member ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Uranus
- Posts
- 4,958
- Rep Points
- 25470444
Syngex 1 and 2
what is the difference between these two?
-
09-30-2003, 05:02 PM #2Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- georgia
- Posts
- 367
- Rep Points
- 10
-
09-30-2003, 05:51 PM #3Senior Member ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Uranus
- Posts
- 4,958
- Rep Points
- 25470444
which is better
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
-
09-30-2003, 06:03 PM #4Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- georgia
- Posts
- 367
- Rep Points
- 10
One is not better than the other. Syngex 1 is better for mass building and Syngex is better suited for lean gains. Ultimately they would be best stacked together. To better understand them you need to undertsnd their target homones.
Syngex 1
1-test(legal steroid)
4-ad(precursor to 4-test)
Syngex 2
1,4ad(precursor to boldenone)
4-HT(legal steroid)
19nor(precursor to nandrolone)
-
09-30-2003, 07:42 PM #5Senior Member ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Uranus
- Posts
- 4,958
- Rep Points
- 25470444
so stacking these two together would probably be good for my next cycle after I finish the paradeca and decavar cycle?
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
-
10-01-2003, 07:18 AM #6Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- georgia
- Posts
- 367
- Rep Points
- 10
Who knows by then VPX may have something even better. As soon as you think they have come out with the best possible product they raise the bar again. But yes, that would be an excellent cycle. However, do not forget you have to stay off of prohormones as long as you were on.Originally posted by topolo
so stacking these two together would probably be good for my next cycle after I finish the paradeca and decavar cycle?
-
10-01-2003, 10:15 AM #7NGA/IFPA Pro Bodybuilder ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2001
- Location
- GLOBAL!
- Posts
- 11,066
- Rep Points
- 19641026
Good advice. And if VPX is going to come out with something new, everyone at IM will hear about it first!!Originally posted by bigswole30
Who knows by then VPX may have something even better. As soon as you think they have come out with the best possible product they raise the bar again. But yes, that would be an excellent cycle. However, do not forget you have to stay off of prohormones as long as you were on.
All American EFX Sponsored Pro Bodybuilder/Internet Marketing Manager
P/RR/S DVD and E-Book now available!
P/RR/S DVD http://www.home-gym.com/erbrporepras.html
P/RR/S E-BOOK html www.X-traordinaryWorkouts.com
Monthly columnist for Planet Muscle, Natural Muscle and IronMan magazines.
www.prrstraining.com Time to GROW Without Plateau!
Personal Training
Gopro is available for online personal training, dietary guidance, and contest prep coaching.
Send me a PM or e-mail if interested. Thank you.
-
10-01-2003, 09:10 PM #8Senior Member ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Uranus
- Posts
- 4,958
- Rep Points
- 25470444
would it be safe to assume that at this time this is the most cutting edge stacj kvailable?
I feel that I am living in the past by doing paradeca and decavar and I want to be as advanced as I can be for my next cycle. Originally Posted by ForemanRules
-
10-01-2003, 09:11 PM #9Senior Member ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Uranus
- Posts
- 4,958
- Rep Points
- 25470444
i meant to say stack available
Originally Posted by ForemanRules
-
10-01-2003, 09:25 PM #10Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- georgia
- Posts
- 367
- Rep Points
- 10
Well VPX defines cutting edge. Paradeca and Decavar are still ahead years ahead of most companies. Syngex 1 & 2 are even further ahead. IMHO, the VPX Cypionated products are ahead of Syngex. If money is not a concern I would say go with the three cyp's, 1-t, 4-t, and 4-ht. However this is not a cheap cycle.
-
10-02-2003, 09:54 AM #11NGA/IFPA Pro Bodybuilder ELITE MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2001
- Location
- GLOBAL!
- Posts
- 11,066
- Rep Points
- 19641026
bigswole is right! The cyps are # 1 in the cutting edge department, but Syn I and II are not far behind with their polylipid delivery technology. Paradeca and Decavar remain excellent products as well, and they have been improved since their inception.Originally posted by bigswole30
Well VPX defines cutting edge. Paradeca and Decavar are still ahead years ahead of most companies. Syngex 1 & 2 are even further ahead. IMHO, the VPX Cypionated products are ahead of Syngex. If money is not a concern I would say go with the three cyp's, 1-t, 4-t, and 4-ht. However this is not a cheap cycle.
Coming soon: a nandrolone decanoate cyp.
All American EFX Sponsored Pro Bodybuilder/Internet Marketing Manager
P/RR/S DVD and E-Book now available!
P/RR/S DVD http://www.home-gym.com/erbrporepras.html
P/RR/S E-BOOK html www.X-traordinaryWorkouts.com
Monthly columnist for Planet Muscle, Natural Muscle and IronMan magazines.
www.prrstraining.com Time to GROW Without Plateau!
Personal Training
Gopro is available for online personal training, dietary guidance, and contest prep coaching.
Send me a PM or e-mail if interested. Thank you.
Similar Threads
-
New to the board, anyone ever tried Syngex II?
By Liono31 in forum SupplementsReplies: 0Last Post: 01-04-2009, 09:54 PM -
Syngex I
By trHawT in forum SupplementsReplies: 0Last Post: 09-25-2004, 05:44 AM -
done w/ syngex
By Hanz29 in forum SupplementsReplies: 2Last Post: 03-09-2004, 03:42 PM -
Syngex 1 & 2, M 1-T, Clenbutrx
By giodante1 in forum SupplementsReplies: 9Last Post: 03-01-2004, 09:07 PM -
VPX Syngex I & II
By Musclebound in forum SupplementsReplies: 4Last Post: 12-01-2003, 10:59 AM
Posting Permissions
DISCLAIMER:
All health, fitness, diet, nutrition & supplement information presented on IronMagazineForums.com's pages is intended as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for proper medical advice. We do not condone the use of anabolic steroids (AAS), all information about AAS is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Consult your physician or health care professional before performing any of the exercises, or following any diet, nutrition or supplement advice described on this website. As well as any exercise technique or regimen, diet, supplement, etc., particularly if you are pregnant or nursing, or if you are elderly or have chronic or recurring medical conditions. Discontinue any exercise that causes you pain or severe discomfort and consult a medical expert. The statements made about products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (U.S.). They are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition or disease. Please consult with your own physician or health care practitioner regarding the suggestions and recommendations made at IronMagazineForums.com. Neither the author of the information, nor the producer, nor distributors of such information make any warranty of any kind in regard to the content of the information presented on this website. Except as specifically stated on this site, neither IronMagazineForums.com, nor any of its authors or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of, or in connection with the use of this site. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory, direct, indirect or consequential damages, loss of data, income or profit, loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. Sponsors pay for advertising space, we have no affiliation with the companies that have banners displayed on our websites. Please be advised it is your responsibility to check the laws that govern your country, state, or province in regards to items offered by some companies you may read about on this site.