| You are Unregistered, please register to gain Full access. | 
|
| You are Unregistered, please register to gain Full access. |
|
 |
 |
 |
| Supplement Store | Forums | Main Site | News Blog | Photos | eBooks |
|
|||||||
| Photo Gallery | Register | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Supplements This is the place to find out what supplements work, and which ones don't! Sponsored by: Mass Nutrition |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
02-04-2004, 04:25 PM
|
#1 |
|
...And justice for all.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,390
|
More effective: transdermal 1-T or M1T?
which of the two would be more effective.... im thinking trans 1-T because its 1-T going RIGHT into your muscle but i see so many ppl saying good things about M1T
thanks. ps. i performed a search on this and i couldnt find anything about it. |
|
       
|
|
02-04-2004, 04:28 PM
|
#2 |
|
IronMagLabs Owner
Administrator
|
from my own personal experience M1T is more effective.
 BOARD SPONSORS: 
|
|
|
|
02-04-2004, 04:29 PM
|
#3 |
|
Filthy Animal
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Finally back in New England!!
Posts: 5,438
|
When u say the 1-T is "going right into your muscle"...you know that it will have a systemic effect, right? It wont effect the muscles you rub it into locally.
If this is your first cycle, I'd go with the 1-T.
But when you disarm them, you at once offend them by showing that you distrust them, either for cowardice or for want of loyalty, and either of these opinions breeds hatred against you.
-N. Machiavelli |
|
|
|
|
02-04-2004, 04:32 PM
|
#4 |
|
Filthy Animal
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Finally back in New England!!
Posts: 5,438
|
Sorry...just realized you asked which is "More effective". I agree with Prince on that one. Still, I'd go with the 1-T if its your first cycle.
But when you disarm them, you at once offend them by showing that you distrust them, either for cowardice or for want of loyalty, and either of these opinions breeds hatred against you.
-N. Machiavelli |
|
|
|
|
02-04-2004, 04:38 PM
|
#5 |
|
...And justice for all.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,390
|
no its not my first...and sorry yeah i coulda worded that better..... my main point was that it doesnt go orally.... where as m1t does
|
|
|
|
|
02-04-2004, 04:39 PM
|
#6 |
|
IronMagLabs Owner
Administrator
|
M1T is harder on your liver, but as I said more effective from my experience.
BOARD SPONSORS:
|
|
|
|
|
02-04-2004, 05:17 PM
|
#8 |
|
IronMagLabs Owner
Administrator
|
Strength, size, hardness...I am cutting as you probably know, yet I am not losing any weight, just getting leaner and almost no loss in strength...great stuff!
 BOARD SPONSORS:
|
|
|
|
|
02-04-2004, 05:23 PM
|
#9 |
|
Filthy Animal
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Finally back in New England!!
Posts: 5,438
|
Shedding any hair??? Any problems with cramping???
But when you disarm them, you at once offend them by showing that you distrust them, either for cowardice or for want of loyalty, and either of these opinions breeds hatred against you.
-N. Machiavelli |
|
|
|
|
02-04-2004, 05:24 PM
|
#10 |
|
IronMagLabs Owner
Administrator
|
the only side effect I have experienced is lethargy.
BOARD SPONSORS:
|
|
|
|
|
02-04-2004, 05:28 PM
|
#11 |
|
Filthy Animal
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Finally back in New England!!
Posts: 5,438
|
Do you have any hair loss in your family? Are u stacking it with 4AD or just running the M1T? Just curious. Seems like a lot of people are noticing hair loss with this.
But when you disarm them, you at once offend them by showing that you distrust them, either for cowardice or for want of loyalty, and either of these opinions breeds hatred against you.
-N. Machiavelli |
|
|
|
|
02-04-2004, 05:37 PM
|
#12 |
|
...And justice for all.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,390
|
i wouldnt mind losing a bit of hair
 ..... my hair is so god damned thick |
|
|
|
|
02-04-2004, 05:41 PM
|
#13 |
|
Filthy Animal
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Finally back in New England!!
Posts: 5,438
|
Mine too, but I'd like to keep it that way.
But when you disarm them, you at once offend them by showing that you distrust them, either for cowardice or for want of loyalty, and either of these opinions breeds hatred against you.
-N. Machiavelli |
|
|
|
|
02-04-2004, 06:23 PM
|
#14 |
|
...And justice for all.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,390
|
i think im gonna go for the:
2 weeks m1t 2 weeks 6-oxo 2 weeks m1t 4 weeks nolva |
|
|
|
|
02-04-2004, 11:16 PM
|
#16 | |
|
IronMagLabs Owner
Administrator
|
Quote:
BOARD SPONSORS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-05-2004, 02:51 AM
|
#17 |
|
The Bunny Is Bulking!
Elite Member
|
this 2 weeks on 2 off thing bugs me...i see no reason to run it that way..you have access to gear anti-e's (nolva clomid)...so you can handle a big shutdown..
plus..at most, your running a 4 week cycle...not your average 10 weeker a gear cycle is...2 on 2 off 2 on just extends the time your body is out of whack can anyone give me ANY decent reason why 2on 2 off 2on is a good idea, besides fear of shutdown or sides |
|
|
|
|
02-05-2004, 05:15 AM
|
#18 |
|
GO Buckeyes!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern, NJ
Posts: 5,586
|
I'm with you Rabbit. When M1T first came on the scene, everyone was concerned about its hepatotoxicity. Combined with the fact that most of the weight gain seems to occur in the first two weeks, the logic was to run short two week cycles to allow your body to recoup.
I think hepatotoxicity is an issue, a 4 week cycle however is well within reason. What I'm finding is while its true most of the weight gain occurs in the first two weeks, most of the strength gains occur in weeks 3 and 4. Although 2 on/2 off/2 on may seem to be safer, my concern is the 'yo-yo' effect it has on your endocrine system. Plus I'm betting the weight gain seen in two weeks will be harder to hang on to then a 4 week cycle. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
