Thread: Rebound XT

Youre saying this over-the-counter stuff is stronger than nolva??

You must of have some bunk nolva.

what the hell is the ingredient?

They have the write up on the DS web site. i've heard good things about it
and will probable try it.

Originally Posted by du510

Youre saying this over-the-counter stuff is stronger than nolva??

Sldge says yes

Originally Posted by Robert DiMaggio

what the hell is the ingredient?

Exemestane

Any Profiles done?

Originally Posted by dg806

Exemestane

correct me if I am wrong but isn't that an Rx drug?

Exemestane is an Anti-aromatase not an anti-estrogen ... and it has been compared in favor with tamoxifen for Breast Cancer pacients. It is often used on-cycle and not post.

Originally Posted by maze

Exemestane is an Anti-aromatase not an anti-estrogen ... and it has been compared in favor with tamoxifen for Breast Cancer pacients. It is often used on-cycle and not post.

yup, and as far as I can find just like Tamoxifen is an Rx drug so is Exemestane.

Originally Posted by maze

Exemestane is an Anti-aromatase not an anti-estrogen ... and it has been compared in favor with tamoxifen for Breast Cancer pacients. It is often used on-cycle and not post.

How would an AI help in pre-existing gyno (as TP said he used it for in his first post)??

Originally Posted by du510

Youre saying this over-the-counter stuff is stronger than nolva??

Just giving you my experiences. Tis all.

Nolva actually isn't that effective for me. Dermal 6-oxo has proven better in the past.

I would still like to know how they are able to manufacture (or have manufactured) an Rx drug and market it as an OTC supplement.

Rob, how do you know its an rx drug? What classifies something as such? (I am asking honestly here).

Sledge said it's structure is BASED on exemestane.

It's not Exemestane, but a metabolite, therefore not an Rx drug, per se. Most likely it's a slightly altered and much more potent form, as exemestane's close cousin, formestane, has very poor bioavailability.

I would guess it is an orphaned drug that is not under any patent restriction for this specific application.

Those poor orphans!

Happy to adopt.

Originally Posted by Twin Peak

FYI, DS's new anti-e is now for sale. I have been using it about a week now and I am rather impressed.

It *seems* to be rather potent as I am breaking out like crazy (6-oxo never did this to me) and I have had a gyno flare up that nothing has helped (oral and dermal 6-oxo, mega dose tamoxifen, armidex) and its almost gone now -- though I am double dosing it. And my joints as of yesterday are really starting to dry up.

I have no idea whether this will be an impressive test booster in the real world, though on paper it looks rather good.

Must be good shit if it's doing something for Mr Non-Responder[TM].

I'm most interested in his no-shutdown anabolic and "Meltdown," his "safe" uncoupler. He's also going to release something as good or better than ALRI's Ergomax LMR, which is possibly DMT (desoxy-methyl-testosterone).

Originally Posted by Twin Peak

Rob, how do you know its an rx drug? What classifies something as such? (I am asking honestly here).

because I looked into it, Exemestane is a drug.

Correct, Exemestane is a drug, which, like Formestane, is used (injected) to control certain cancers. It works better than Formestane,which is why Formestane was orphaned, and hence, available at your board sponsor.

Originally Posted by brodus

I'm most interested in his no-shutdown anabolic and "Meltdown," his "safe" uncoupler. He's also going to release something as good or better than ALRI's Ergomax LMR, which is possibly DMT (desoxy-methyl-testosterone).

I am looking forward to the uncoupler too, though its "Melting Point." Which anabolic are you referring to?

I tend to agree with Rob. Just like with PH's, it was not a drug but something that converts to a drug. I believe very soon, you will see the FDA halt all sells of research chemiclas as they are technically illegal anyway. They just stopped Matt from getting his synephrine HCl as they deemed it a drug just like ephedra. They are cracking down hard.

Originally Posted by dg806

I tend to agree with Rob. Just like with PH's, it was not a drug but something that converts to a drug. I believe very soon, you will see the FDA halt all sells of research chemiclas as they are technically illegal anyway. They just stopped Matt from getting his synephrine HCl as they deemed it a drug just like ephedra. They are cracking down hard.

There is a lot technically and legally wrong with this paragraph.

And I was not agreeing or disagreeing with Rob, I was inquiring how something got classified as a drug.

Originally Posted by Twin Peak

There is a lot technically and legally wrong with this paragraph.

And I was not agreeing or disagreeing with Rob, I was inquiring how something got classified as a drug.

Legally what?

Originally Posted by Twin Peak

I was inquiring how something got classified as a drug.

All I know is probably what you already know. If something is marketed as a supplement, but drug-like claims are made - the FDA can pull it. If it is noted for health concerns (L-Tryptophan for instance) because of bad batches being made or abuse, then the FDA can again step in and pull it off the market for analisys.

If they deem it to need forms of control, then it can become a drug. Ginkgo Biloba in some parts of Europe is prescription, as is St Johns Wort.

As is Kava Kava, which is quite ridiculous.

A stronger anti aromatase than Arimidex?? No way.